Safaricon? An Amateur Investor's Perspective PDF Print E-mail
Written by Nanjala Nyabola   
Wednesday, 19 March 2008

A few years ago I was looking through the Daily Nation and saw the full spread Kenya Airways advertisement about their Initial Public Offering (IPO).

I was still pretty young by then but having endured Business Education in a school that took KCPE pretty seriously, I thought even then that this was a great investment opportunity. (I kid you not).

I put the idea to my mother but she laughed me off. A single parent in a developing country, why on earth would she even go and take such a risk? Needless to say, a few years later when there was a run on the KQ stock and the share price hit Ksh. 99, I was not only vindicated but quite smug about it. My mother still will not invest in the stock market but the idea has been running around my head for the past few years. There are stories of people who bought their first shares at 18 and left graduate school with tens of thousands of dollars/pounds. And debt free at that. There are also stories of people who invested in the tech bubble and retired at the age of 30 - (read the story of Rachel a young British Entrepreneur).

I myself have never invested in the stock market. Although I've perused a few prospectuses in my time, the fear that another ICDC is lurking is enough to put me off (I encouraged my mother to buy, only to hear Uchumi collapse a few years later. Thank goodness she didn't listen to me then either!). However, recently, I've found myself wondering if Safaricom is just the stock to get me off my lazy bum.

Information on this IPO is difficult to come by if you're not in Kenya, but it's not impossible. Looking through the financial reports on the company website, in the last 4 years, they've made a healthy profit. They have paid dividends to all their shareholders in the last 3 years as well, which means that if things stay on course you will definitely be taking some money home at the end of the year. Although Celtel has given them more than enough competition, Safaricom is today, by market share, subscription base and many other measures the largest mobile provider in Kenya, encroaching upon Celtel's dominance in regional telephony. On a more general note, Xan Rice reported in 2006 for the Guardian that the Kenyan Stock Exchange (NSE) was one of the most profitable in the world, gaining 787% in value over the last 5 years.

So why not invest? Maybe it's just the coward in me, but something tells me that when something is too good to be true, it usually isn't. More likely than not, my fears are unfounded, but I'll share them with you anyway. Firstly, given the hostile investment climate around the world I worry that the downturn will eventually strike Kenya. The USA is one of Kenya's biggest trading partners (AGOA anyone?), and a slowdown in trade in that country will eventually trickle down to us. On the other hand, the Beast from the East (China) has shown itself more than willing to pick up the economic slack, without the attendant questions of democracy and governance that Uncle Sam insists on asking.

Allow me to have a third hand and suggest however, that China's currency is itself undervalued and its economy overheating according to most economic analysis (See The Economist.com this week for an in depth analysis of China's thirst for resources) and one lurking threat at the moment is that many Olympians may boycott the event to protest high levels of pollution in Beijing, forcing sponsors to withdraw from massive investments in that country. Not to mention the current fiasco in Tibet.

Being a Kencell and then Celtel lass myself, I have always had doubts about the Safaricom business model. Bigger isn't always better, and although it's great in general terms for mobile phone telephony to be so pervasive in the country, one has to wonder when the market will say "Enough!" In short, Safaricom seems to be making most of its money off an immense volume of SIM cards at an unbearably low price. Although you could argue that those SIM cards have to be used and thus there is money in that, the 3 defunct SIM cards sitting in the bottom of my suitcase beg to differ. Already in the UK the mobile phone companies have developed a reliance on contracts to make money and Pay as You go (Kenya's scratch card model) is confined to bottom of the line handsets and for the use of broke international students like yours truly. If the company cannot make profits, it cannot pay dividends; where does that leave the investor?

More specifically, I worry that the current investment climate in Kenya has all the makings of a bubble - a self-perpetuating rise in share prices of a particular industry. While Safaricom's shares aren't technically on offer yet, the speculative frenzy with which Kenyans have attacked the NSE over the last three years is, for me, cause for concern. Many people aren't investing because they understand the logic and procedures of being an investor but because their neighbour is doing it, or their Aunt made a huge profit on the KQ run and now they want a piece o the action. Research has proven that non-wealthy people, with a medium level of education are more likely to invest if the people in their immediate society do so (see Hong, Kubik and Stein call in their paper "Social Interaction and Social Participation", 2004, Journal of Finance), and certainly in Rice's article of 2006, many of the fruit sellers and market workers were more than eager to compare notes with family members and friends. This is all well and good when stocks are on the up and up, but any economist will tell you, stock markets operate in cycles of Booms and Busts; a bullish market (favourable to investment) can't last forever.

However, one of my personal mottos has always been if I fall; let it be from a high place. Other than my nervous disposition there is no reason to believe that Safaricom shares will be nothing more than another chapter in the seemingly never ending success story of the NSE.

If Mobitelea turns out not to be a front for dodgy government dealings and Kenyans are actually given room to invest, my advice to other would be investors is first and foremost, keep an eye on the stock brokers. In the stock market, as in life, don't hand over your money to someone you wouldn't introduce to your mother. It's cause for concern that the Capital Markets Authority is having such a hard time regulating brokerages but hopefully the government will hear the calls for greater independence for the CMA. Keep your eye on the markets. If you can't follow the ups and downs of your shares at least weekly don't bother. Buy early and unless you plan on sticking it out for the long run, if things start to go horribly wrong don't be a hero. Even with massive infusions of government cash, if a stock is crashing dramatically, there's a pretty good chance that the company is well on its way to collapse. Sell, sell, sell! I found this very interesting article about an investment club in England - recommended reading for any amateur out there. If you are a rank amateur like I am, the Financial Times last year came out with a great book on "How to Use the Financial Pages" available on Amazon, for about £10 (1,300 Ksh). Take my word for it, it's a good investment, and may save you a great deal of pain.





Digg!Del.icio.us!Google!Facebook!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Trackback(0)
Comments (20)add
0
Risk takers
written by donde , March 22, 2008
With stock market you have to be prepared to take the risk which is quite real.The only person who can really benefit out of it is one who can be able to see his/her investments value go down by even half without any problem. For the amateurs its better to go for the Bull market and dispose off at the earliest opportunity.Leave the Bear and Stag for the real speculators!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
not a good idea
written by Amir Ibrahim , March 22, 2008
Guys, I think now that the election is over, we can take the knives out and start attacking Kibaki again, for there is a lot he is doing wrong. The ODM are not going to be an opposition, there in it for the tumbo only. Kazi kwetu.

Now, coming in the same month as all of that trouble with stock brokers at the Nairobi exchange, it is bad manners for Kimunya to even suggest that this would be the right time to have an IPO. Secondly, look at the price and notice that we are selling the family jewels and selling them really cheap. What a tragic loss.

The lack of standards and over-sight, the seeming complicity of auditors and the fact that the stock brokers really decide everything that happens at the brokers shows you just how foolhardy this may be. Like with all things a brave punter may get very well rewarded, but the rumours, widespread rumours that there is a lot wrong at the Stock Exchange should give even the bravest soul pause for thought.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Suspicious Profits
written by Kim G , March 22, 2008
Its unusual that an enterprise in an aid-dependent African country with very poor social-economic indicators can make profits of $250 million within 7 years of its existence. Most established companies took decades before they could make that kind of profit. And why is Michael Joseph refusing to give way to another executive? Is he afraid that the whole pack of cards will tumble with his exit? Are we seeing the makings of another Worldcom, another Enron? Imagine the potential unrest when millions of Kenyan shareholders find one day that their investments have vaporized ...
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
shock capital and the con
written by a guest , March 22, 2008
An even bigger question is a moral one. Do we not understand that aside from taxes and the profits of state firms, every other means of revenue collection increases the gulf between the rich and the poor? That it profits people for doing nothing but taking advantage of opportunities that other Kenyans simply do not have?

After this IPO a number of Kenyans will be very happy indeed, they will number no more than 100-200,000 out of a population of some 37 millions. But more than that, of this number, only some 50 or so will control the bulk of the share-holding.

The ease with which the resistance to the IPO has fallen away recalls the other examples in Naomi Klein's Shock Doctrine. I am not at all opposed the markets, but whichever way you look at this, it is grand theft. We are selling Safaricom for $750 mn and yet it makes one third of that in a year!!!

If we are really determined to turn this country around, we would do well to utilise that $250 million (what fraction is the state's dividend) and plough it into infrastructure and other development projects. Here is Kibaki reaching out with a begging bowl while peddling in the other hand a cash cow. Note that total subscribers in Kenya now are a mere 9 million or so and that Safaricom's forays into internet and money transfer should shield its revenues from the effects of Econet's entry into the market; hence that $250 should go up maybe even to $350 million a year? These are not the only factors, Kenyans are the second highest SMSers on earth, and Nairobi has the highest mobile phone call density anywhere. If these patterns are to hold and revenue from the internet and m-pesa to expand, that $350 million may well be doubled, or even tripled. What a loss!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
too low
written by Rateng\' , March 22, 2008
100,000 is far too low. You are neglecting some key facts about this IPO. First the shares will be 60% of the NSE, the company has great name recognition and visibility, is there a greater FMCG than airtime? I take your point about the number of Kenyans participating, but by all accounts it is more likely to be in the 2 million range unless the post-election drama and inflation have really filisishad wananchi
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
lets get fundamentals right
written by pndiangui , March 23, 2008
First anyone claiming that Safaricom was sold soo cheap , might be dead wrong. On the other hand, a claim that the growth of Safaricom might be in perpetuity like the one from Anonamous is really dangerous.
Infact the entry of Telcom Kenya and Econet is just one of the short-term competition that Safaricom will have to contend with.
Even more intresting is the entry of VOIP players coming into a synergestic play with the advancement of wi-fi and wimax. This offers the perfect opportunity for the growth of almost free voice solutions like Skype, a massive component of Safaricom's earnings and a key component of expected future cashflows that guided the current valuation of the firm at Ksh. 200 Billion. Am not a pessimist, and infact in the short-term (3 years ) , Safaricom might withstand the likes of Econet and Telkom Kenya even with falling voice and data services prices. But beyond this, and with advent of TEAMS causing more ISP's to head into VOIP solutions and the coming of cheaper VOIP mobile handsets, it will be the capabilities that Safaricom will develop around newer business models around Voice and the newer value-added data services such as M-pesa. I am encouraged by Safaricom working closer with Goolge to enter services such as Mapping. But even further into the cashflow box of Safaricom will be the value-added services beyond voice that solves ordinary Kenyan's problems such as health , education, m-commerce and such that will determine its continued growth. Pricing of Voice solutions alone faces a great assult in the future. However for the current investors , the pricing of Safaricom presents a good opportunity fundamentally. Drawing from last year's earnings the price to earnings ratio is about 11 , basing on earnings of 45 cents per share (17 billion shared out on 40 billion shares) . I will be publishing on a deeper analysis on Safricom's valuation in the next two days.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
A gross miscalculation?
written by Jeremy Thuku , March 24, 2008
Though there are the naysayers (And plenty of them may i add) who do believe that everything about SafCom is a fiasco, i believe that its a good thing that more kenyan companies are getting listed. The NSE i believe is almost 50 years old yet has hardly 50 companies. Listing a company increases the public scrutinity on it and therefore the company ideally becomes more accountable - something critically needed in a country whose levels of institutional corruption are almost at par with 9ja and DRC.

However, I do believe that at Kshs10/share, the company's share price is severely undervalued. Floating 5 billion shares in a stock market that only has 15 billion shares (correct me if im wrong) is going to overstate the company's presence in the capital market and the NSE volume index. Though admittedly the govt needs something to rebound the economy and source revenues from an economy that is expected to undergo a recession,I feel the idea was rushed and poorly implemented.

However come the offer date, I will arm myself with the required shillings and stake my claim in this pie
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re: Suspicious Profits
written by KK , March 24, 2008
And why is Michael Joseph refusing to give way to another executive? Is he afraid that the whole pack of cards will tumble with his exit?

I read your question and just smiled. MJ was meant to leave a few years ago (2000-2002). The CEO was meant to be picked by the Kenya Government which has majority shares.Do you know what happened, there was a heated boardroom argument as to whether the CEO was to come from the mountain or from the lake area! They could not agree and both sides agreed to keep MJ on until after the shares are floated.

Considering the post election violence, the good thing about is I think Vodafone has kept the right to choose the CEO or else we would have another mas action programme ahead of us!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by benadede , March 24, 2008
My two cents is that for one who is afraid of risks, has little knowledge of profiting from the NSE but has a bit of spare cash or can pool some spare cash with friends, the way to go is the mutual funds way. These professionals spread your risks amongst profitable top companies. As long as the economy is doing well, your are sure to make good returns on your money this way.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
oh dear
written by magothe , March 25, 2008
I read the above and didn't know er to laugh or howl. You guys are supposed to be the creme de la creme of Kenya!
Safcom IPO is an idea whose time has come almost too late. It'll put Kenya on the map of perfoming stock markets in the World. Out of 11m mobile subscribers in Kenya, Safcom has 9m (from almost zero in 1998!). The IPO will almost double the number of shares at the NSE and will probably douible the number of shreholders from current 800,000.
The Mobitelea issue is still there, but I'm hearing civil society voices being raised.
You are guaranteed 50% return on your investment (see me if you don't make this much).
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
come on now
written by Stephen Wanyama , March 25, 2008
Magothe, do you not agree though that it is robbery?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
who/what is robbery?
written by magothe , March 25, 2008
Wanyama, if you are referring to Mobitelea, yes it is robbery, so is bailing out Northern Rock, the question is who is going to pursue the issue if there is no opposition in Kenya.
2ndly, given the IPO is now more/less a reality, is boycotting for the greater good?
If its the pricing, well its meant to attract every Kenyan who can put together Ksh10,000 i.e. an equitable way of giving Kenyans what they've grown...
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Stephen Wanyama , March 26, 2008
Even when given a chance to do the right thing, the ODM elects to drop the ball.
"If this had been brought to the floor of the House, Kenyans would have known the faces behind the mysterious Mobitelea. This poses the danger that the ghost owners will now be unjustly enriched. The Parliamentary Investment Committee has the powers to demand the identity of Mobitelea owners," he said.
Where is the justice in the enrichment of the 1 million or so who will buy the Safaricom shares? What of the other 37 million Kenyans who cannot afford to take part? Is there justice in the enrichment of these at the expense of other Kenyans, is there at all any justice in the fact that this valuation is bank-robbingly low? The ODM should make itself useful for once, just show Kenyans flat out that privatisations across the board are robbery, it matters little whether Mobitelea exists, or not, privatisations take public property and award it to people who have done nothing to deserve it. They are transfers of wealth that increase the inequality gap, and do very little to make the economy more efficient. Rethinking Privatisation.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Shiroh , March 26, 2008
What baffles me is why do they want to know the owners of Mobitelea?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Amir Ibrahim , March 26, 2008
Yes, indeed the question of Mobitelea seems to me irrelevant to the discussion, and Anyang' Nyong'o showcases breath-taking ignorance in comparing the IPO price of the Kenya Airways and Safaricom stocks; oh and also and also on the matter of the conflict of interest. The ODM really could do Kenya a big favour, maybe even provide good reasons, and there are many, for putting of the fire sale.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Ignorant yet with a point
written by pndiangui , March 26, 2008
I see Nyongo's case against the conflict of intrest that is in NSE. I also see alot of sense in strenghthhening the CMA and loading it with Talent that it deserves.
Infact Kimunya and ODM should have taken this chance to force the demutualization of NSE by legistlating on the owners of financial markets. NSE is mutually owned by brokers and this is one of the stikking points that abhours its independency. Brokers cannot regulate their conduct in the Market. It is time that NSE demutualised; I actually advocate for the state to take up some stake in NSE , and then have a bigger chunk of NSE with a strategic investor who can bring forth the needed technology and sophistication in the design and excution of financial markets instruments.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Incongruous
written by Savant , March 27, 2008
Simple. This sale is incongruous with the workings of a market system. Two words, transparency and conflict of interest.

Surprising that out of all these supposedly 'educated' Kenyans, only Ndiangui gets it.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
ha! savant?
written by Stephen Wanyama , March 27, 2008
Not so savant. The question of who or what owns Mobitelea really is not our business if Vodafone paid the proper price for the stake in Safaricom. I mean Vodafone Kenya Limited is a private company, who or what own it really are not our business. I mean do you know who owns Vodafone PLC stock? There was a licence, the licence was paid for and VKL allocated their shares as they saw fit. None of our business. Don't lets get bogged down with that, don't lets be so lazy, there is a lot wrong with this IPO, let's focus on that. There is conflict of interest true, but I that this is the same for all IPOs the world over, the issuing house has a preponderant influence on the price, and on book-building. Apart from the listed bourses, and even in those, the stock brokers and institutional shareholders have an undue influence on the running of the exchange and therefore an unfair advantage over your average retail investor, it is not just Jimnah Mbaru.

Transparency for me is a long term goal, a cultural one, one that even a regulator or demutualization would not immediately achieve. Until there are more players involved, and too many competing interests to be served by corruption, a cartel will lord it over the NSE. I mean look at oil for an example, or look at Nyong'o's ridiculous comments. The problem is that most of the brains on some of these important matters are on the PNU side, i.e, the people who could properly formulate reformative solutions are happy with things the way they are. Those who are unhappy like Nyong'o or Raila are inhabiting caves the Middle Ages.

Was Kenya Airways privatisation transparent, was National Bank, was Kenya-Re? Can a privatisation in a US/ UK/ wanna-be system really be transparent? Do we, even as we shout into the wind about inequality really think about the consequences of what we are doing with Safaricom and other public companies?

Here now is the real problem, Safaricom is being stolen from the Kenyan people. That price is just outright ridiculous for a company with the strength and depth and breadth of Safaricom.

Safaricom owns infrastructure (through TEAMS), Safaricom is competing with Western Union and MoneyGram in money transfer, Safaricom is a sort of bank (through m-pesa again), Safaricom is competing with ISPs and Safaricom is the biggest and most powerful telco in East and Central Africa with a name and brand recognition bigger than any other company in the region. We are being taken for a massive ride, Mobitelea and Jimnah Mbaru are sideshows, if you want to stop all of them, first realise that Safaricom should not be on the market at all. There are no efficiency gains to be got from this IPO, there is no advantage to the market, it will make 36 million people much poorer, and a small 1 million marginally better off, while immensely enriching a small group, maybe 100,000 Kenyans immensely.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Really?
written by Savant , April 01, 2008
Not so savant. The question of who or what owns Mobitelea really is not our business if Vodafone paid the proper price for the stake in Safaricom. I mean Vodafone Kenya Limited is a private company, who or what own it really are not our business.


If you had restricted your opinions to just this statement and explained yourself, you might have made sense.

However, like most Kenyans who chose to opine on a subject that you are not very conversant with you end up making no sense at all.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Stephen Wanyama , April 01, 2008
Not sure what you are on about, so I will just ignore you. Still, you will notice that even with plans for demutualisation, the brokers still want to retain, at least according to the BDA published E&Y proposals, upto 80% of the NSE.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Write comment

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 24 June 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >


Login/Register

Login/ Register

click to subscribe
feed image

Contact

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it for content related questions and suggestions

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it for republication enquiries

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it to report faults or offensive comment.


Archives | About Us | KenyaImagine How To | Privacy Policy | ContactUs | Join KenyaImagine |  Advertise Here| Legal Disclaimer | Terms & Conditions | Directory
rss-2.png

 

Copyright 2008 KenyaImagine.com, the KenyaImagine logo and KenyaImagine.com are trademarks of  the Six Degrees Media Company