Oil's sticky end PDF Print E-mail
Written by Tim Norwood   
Thursday, 22 November 2007

Oil futures are reaching ever upward, drawing closer and closer to the price range that will have catastrophic and lasting effects on the growth and development of our very oil dependent economy. And we are as a country unprepared. Only five years ago, a barrel of oil cost $25. Today, the oil price is threatening the $100 price barrier that-adjusted for inflation- was only reached in the crisis of the 1970s. Analysts forecast even greater price increases; Goldman Sachs predicts an imminent breach of the $100 barrier, and a former Shell chairman charges politicians with sitting idly by while the global economy sleepwalks into $150 a barrel crude.

There are two main reasons for the sharp rise in oil prices; the first is the increased appetite in the developing world for energy, cars, industries, increased air-travel and all the conveniences of an increasingly westernized life. China and India are especially gluttonous, slurping up billions of gallons of petroleum in fuel for their burgeoning middle-classes and plastics industries. Countries like ours are not too far behind, everyone in Nairobi wants to be driving these days.

The other reason is the fact that global stocks of crude oil are running out. Some analysts even claim that we are now long past peak oil, the moment when the global petroleum production rate hits its maximum. While it is true that many countries are joining the list of oil exporters, the new oil wells are small in comparison to the massive oil wells, in Saudi Arabia, the North Sea and Iran for example, that are fast drying up. The output at these new wells does not match the escalating and insatiable global demand. To aggravate an already bad situation, this scarcity and the desire to exercise strategic influence on exporting countries is fomenting unrest in the Middle East. From Turkey through to the old Soviet republics and Central Asia sits a powder keg so primed for explosion, it keeps energy markets on a constant knife edge, and speculators constantly betting on high prices.

Even worse, the world of oil is an obscure realm where everything seems secret and very little is known for a fact. Many analysts are suspicious of the declared reserves of many OPEC countries, and oil companies themselves operate under rules that are inscrutable and often designed more to cheer stakeholders up than to reflect the truth. It is after all in their interests that they keep prices low enough to make alternatives they do not control less viable.

Still, some of them are confessing that there is little left in their tanks. Mexico recently announced that its reserves would run out in just seven years. What this means is that we may very well be much closer to severe shortages than is immediately obvious. The efforts to decrease global dependence on oil have been waged for a number of years now, but there's a real sense that unless governments take on this looming catastrophe head-on, there will be sorry days for their citizens in the near future.

In our Kenyan experience, climate change and peak oil come together to paint a very bleak picture for energy security in the future, especially as regards electricity production.

Rural electrification programmes -KPLC figures say there are 150,000 new connections every year, an increasingly prosperous middle class, an electricity penetration of only 15% (2005) and plans to industrialize the economy, all signal an even greater demand for electricity in the country. At the same time however, decreased rainfall has led to such low water levels in the mainstays of our power generation system- the hydroelectric dams that we increasingly we must depend on petroleum dependent and therefore oil-price sensitive thermal generators to meet the shortfall. As of 2005, 23% of our energy needs were met through such diesel-powered generators as those belonging to Tsavo Power and IberAfrica. Ministry of Energy projections then showed that these generators would this year be providing 34.5% of our energy requirements. In 2005, these sold power to the national utility at  Kes 7.19 and  Kes 9.96 per KWh compared to KenGen's mainly hydropower energy which cost KPLC only Kes 2.57. This resulted in a retail cost of US 9.1¢, way in excess of what prevails in our industrial competitors Egypt (4¢) and South Africa (2.5¢). Quite clearly we cannot continue with the current trend that sees us increasing our reliance on the thermal generators, if Kenyan industries are to make products that are competitively priced abroad and if we are to attract increased FDI.

In addition to power costs, figures from the Registrar of Motor Vehicles indicate there are 12,000 new cars registered every month. The national appetite for oil it seems just grows and grows.

Increasingly also, around the world the diversion of agricultural land for the production of biofuels is leading to food shortages and price inflation. What would be a ready alternative, i.e. agro-fuels, compete with food crops for land, and like has recently happened in Mexico, push food prices increasingly higher.

The effect of high fuel prices will also impact badly on the environment as families that previously depended on kerosene will be sent back to using firewood and charcoal.

And this is the curse of the rising cost of oil; it acts as a regressive tax. Those with less have fewer options at their disposal and will be forced to give away even more. As oil prices creep upward, the government may even be compelled to cut back on fuel levies thus reducing government revenues and subsequently its spending on social programmes.

All in all this may very well be the most important issue at the campaigns, and curiously it is the one none of the candidates is talking about. It may sound like scaremongering, but the cocktail of climate change and peak oil is much more dangerous than global terrorism or the threat of nuclear weapons. It threatens to completely change our way of life and impoverish our country. The key to getting out of this ahead is to be ahead of the game. We are already very late, but even now if the government can come out and tell the public just what horror we are facing, there may yet be scope for meaningful change.





Digg!Del.icio.us!Google!Facebook!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Trackback(0)
Comments (6)add
0
MOVE EASTWARDS
written by Mkenya Ghuba ya Uajemi , November 23, 2007
For Kenya to cusion itself against the increased oil prices, it has to strategically imporve its ties with middle eastern countries especailly like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Iran. The latter being more strategic becuause of its massive gas reserves and anti American rehtoric. Kenya shoul also embrace Hugo Chavez who has expressed willingness to provide free oil to anti American third world countries.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
you beat me to it!
written by Stephen Wanyama , November 23, 2007
The most important move we can make is to go into biofuels. As Tim points out, our energy needs are simply going to grow and grow, unless we can switch to something else, like Jatropha say then we are going to be faced with riots real soon. People in Nairobi are already complaining about matatu fares.
The last big jumps in oil prices in Western Europe, the crisis of the 1970s led to massive changes in Europe and North America, greater insulation for homes, more efficient engines, an improvement in public transport systems (especially railways and buses) and so on. This is part of the solution that Kenya may do well to adopt. We have to re-think our spending patterns, how much do we waste on our camputers and televisions idling and so on.

p.s
High idle capacity: In Egypt and South Africa, electricity consumption is primarily industrial unlike in Kenya which is relatively more residential. Statistics indicate that the peak demand in Kenya is 920 MW utilised for only 3 hours a day while the base demand is 500 MW. The difference is 85% in Kenya compared to 20% in South Africa and 30% in Egypt, thus low idle capacity in these countries. Owing to Kenyas consumption pattern, the country continues to build capacity to meet peak demand that remains idle for the most part which is expensive.

So those Kalonzo proposals for 24 hour industry are welcome arent they?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
steps are being made
written by gichangi , November 23, 2007
Read this here.
Solar Electricity Programme
63 schools have received with solar generators
more efficient distibution
Two new substations, Bahati and Baba Ndogo commissioned in November 2006 at a cost of Ksh. 370 million. This is aimed at stemming the frequent and disruptive power blackouts in Eastlands and Ruaraka areas of Nairobi.

Thirsting after oil
However, we are still buying and installing diesel generators including new ones at Hola, Tana River district and El Wak, Mandera District at a total cost of Ksh. 150 million and Ksh. 125 million, respectively. These projects are expected to be commissioned by September 2007.
Still thirsting after dirty fuels
coal exploration. South Africa and Egypt have energy sectors that are underpinned by cheap energy from coal and nuclear power. Could this be us?
Exploration for indigenous hydrocarbon resources in the country is at an advanced staged. These efforts are intended to provide cheaper sources of energy and cut down the huge bill arising from oil importation.
Oil exploration has begun in Lamu while areas with commercially exploitable coal deposits have been identified in Kitui, Mwingi and Kilifi districts.

Renewable energy sources
The Government appreciates the fact that other sources of renewable energy exist in abundance in the country. As a result, no effort is being spared in exploring the same. This includes the 500 Kilowatt wind power plant in Marsabit. Once commissioned, it will reduce the cost of electricity generation from Ksh.36 per kilowatt hour to Ksh.14. This will save the country about Ksh.20 million per year in oil costs.
Biogas from sugar factories
This measure will have the effect of adding 120 megawatt of electricity into the national grid. Currently Mumias Sugar Company is supplying 2 megawatt into the national grid. Mumias recently launched a $50 million (Sh4 billion) power generation project at its current plant. Through the project, the miller expects to generate some 34 mega watts (MW) of power with a surplus of 25mw to be put up for sale to KPLC. Mumias runs another power project that churns out 2mw to the national grid, using a sugarcane waste product, bagasse. The company has already applied to the Electricity Regulatory Commission (ERC) for license for the project.The cost of producing electricity from bagasse is estimated to be less than half the cost of generating electricity from imported petroleum or natural gas.

36 biogas plants installed
This will substitute firewood for cooking and heating around the country.

So high prices may be a good thing if they force us to redirect our energies.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
blackouts for the next 7 years
written by Amir Ibrahim , November 23, 2007
Johannesburg - Eskom's system of rotating existing power supplies - known as load shedding - will be with the country for between five to seven years while systems are upgraded to cope with increased demand, the company said on Thursday.

Link here.
In the oil-free pipeline for Kenya is an additional 35-megawatt 3rd unit at Olkaria II and 70 MW Olkaria IV power plant. It is expected that geothermal output will rise at a rate of 70 megawatts every two years to 400 megawatts by the year 2020. I have seen figures pledging 30MW but these also say we currently produce 400KW wind energy, does anyone know where? At least these sources are not rain or oil reliant.
Interesting about the Marsabit wind plant, I read somewhere that Ngong is another viable site, is Marsabit not too far north? How far north do the electricity pylons go, i.e. is there electricity from the national grid in Moyale, Lodwar and Marsabit?
As regards fuel for transport, the poor will be very affected as already high inflation begins to bite into their food and transport budgets which are very inelastic.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by aeichener , November 23, 2007
The main tree destructors and fuel burners in Kenya are the monster tea factories, while earning less every year.

Kenya presently has almost as little forest cover (1.7 %) as Haiti (under 1 %), and will soon be as desolate and poor.

In comparison: Japan has over 50 % forest cover, Germany something over 30 %. So much for civilized states who think about their future.
By the way, both countries also have a thriving game management and lots of private hunting, and have definitely more (and less enadangered) game than Kenya.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
our disadvantage
written by Peter , December 25, 2007
Presence of alternative and cheaper sources of power: Egypt and South Africa have access to cheaper and readily available sources of energy. 90% of power generated in South Africa is from domestic coal while hydro and nuclear sources account for the rest. In Egypt on the other hand, 85% of total power is generated from natural gas. In Kenya, 67% of total power is generated from hydro sources, 10% geo-thermal and 23% thermal which is price sensitive to fluctuating international fuel prices.
High idle capacity: In Egypt and South Africa, electricity consumption is primarily industrial unlike in Kenya which is relatively more residential. Statistics indicate that the peak demand in Kenya is 920 MW utilised for only 3 hours a day while the base demand is 500 MW. The difference is 85% in Kenya compared to 20% in South Africa and 30% in Egypt, thus low idle capacity in these countries. Owing to Kenyas consumption pattern, the country continues to build capacity to meet peak demand that remains idle for the most part which is expensive.
Unpredictability of weather: Coal and natural gas which are the primary sources of power in South Africa and Egypt are readily available as long as reserves last and therefore are not affected by weather patterns. Hydro power remains Kenyas largest source of power. The seasonal failure of rains in Kenya impacts negatively on power generation as water levels in the countrys reservoirs fall. The country is therefore forced to increase thermal generation to meet the shortfall in hydro-generation. Consequently, the country moves to more expensive electricity which is reflected in higher electricity bills.
Cost of Capital: Most plants in for example Egypt and South Africa were developed in the 50s, 60s and 70s. As such, the plants have already been paid off. The plants in Kenya on the other hand were developed in the 70s, 80s and 90s. For example, 800 MW of the countrys 1,100 MW was installed in the 80s and 90s. Therefore, the financing costs are still being repaid which is reflected in electricity bills that Kenyans pay.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Write comment

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
Last Updated ( Friday, 23 November 2007 )
 
< Prev   Next >


Login/Register

Login/ Register

click to subscribe
feed image

Contact

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it for content related questions and suggestions

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it for republication enquiries

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it to report faults or offensive comment.


Archives | About Us | KenyaImagine How To | Privacy Policy | ContactUs | Join KenyaImagine |  Advertise Here| Legal Disclaimer | Terms & Conditions | Directory
rss-2.png

 

Copyright 2008 KenyaImagine.com, the KenyaImagine logo and KenyaImagine.com are trademarks of  the Six Degrees Media Company