In the 70s, the Economist coined the label "Dutch Disease" to describe
the economic travails of the Netherlands as the country's
export-oriented industrial sector struggled with the increased exchange
rates caused by the rapid growth in gas exports that followed the
discovery and development of the massive Groningen field.
The
extractive sector was so profitable that it captured a large share of
new investment, and its export volume was large enough to alter the
trade balance and boost the currency, further rendering other
activities less attractive.
Today, we can observe a similar phenomenon on a large scale around the
financial industry, whose high profitability for many years has also
caused weakness for other sectors of the economy. As this has developed
around the money centers in New York and, in an even more concentrated
way, London, I would propose to label this the "Anglo Disease."
While the Dutch managed to avoid the "oil curse" that has struck many
oil exporting countries, I will also argue that the Anglo Disease
carries its own curse, whose early symptoms are reflected in the
current financial crisis.
The dominance of the financial world can be readily seen in the growth
of the share of financial firms in total corporate profits (from below
20% in the 70s to above 40% today), in the capture by the richest few -
most of them directly working in the financial industry, or benefitting
from financial investments - of a large chunk of the net growth in
total incomes, and by the concentration of foreign investment in the UK
in mono-activity London.
Financiers, with their ability to monetize today future revenue
streams, are able to generate instant profits which can be captured by
them and, to a lesser extent, their clients and employers. That
capacity to create apparent wealth out of thin air cannot be matched by
any other sector in the economy, and sucks in talent, resources and
money. Meanwhile, the investors that have made those immediate profits
possible will want to ensure that the future flows that underpin them
do materialise, and will impose their rules and discipline on the
underlying economic activity.
Thus the financial world imposes its unrelenting focus on profits and
shareholder value on all economic activities; the domination of "return
on capital" criteria ensures that many activities outside finance are
in decline, as they struggle to reach the required returns on potential
investments. Financial analysis sees labor as a cost, reducing profits,
and pushes for its reduction, either via outsourcing, offsorisation or
wage stagnation. Similarly, government regulations are seen as
restrictions on profit to be fought and eliminated, as, naturally,
taxes.
To boost domestic demand in the face of flat incomes, debt has been
pushed on households as the way to keep on increasing their spending,
to the further benefit of the industry that provides the loans. The
combination of expansionist monetary policies in the West and
mercantilist policies in China has made it possible to find the holy
grail of no inflation and rapid asset price increases, thus generating
massive (and increasingly less taxed) corporate profits. The reality
was, of course, that of huge global imbalances and a massive bubble,
but for the longest time it looked like perfect growth, further
validating the policies that underpinned it.
The model of financial capitalism is thus all-encompassing, not only
grabbing an increasing share of the economic pie, but also dominating
all politicial and economic discourse.
The reality, unfortunately, is that a massive inequality, declining or
stagnant living standards for the majority, which spend more than they
earn, and, as a consequence, a massive bill pushed out into the future.
Well, that future is now, and the imbalances will only be unwound if
incomes match spending, which can happen via lower spending or via
higher incomes.
In the financial capitalism model, incomes are a cost and should not
increase; if that logic prevails - if the Anglo Disease is not cured
from our body politic - spending will crash and a recession is not only
inevitable but likely to be very painful, as the real economy slows
down brutally, and the financial bets that ride it suddenly look highly
unreasonable, and turn into losses (as is happening already in the
subprime sector).
If, to the contrary, policies are focused on propping incomes for the
poor and the middle classes rather than profits, on investing in the
real economy rather than in monetising its existing activities (for
instance via plans to boost energy efficiency in the household sector
and renewable energies), on taxing today's wealthy rather than
tomorrow's citizens, then there is a chance to limit the crash.
Just like the Dutch disease was caused by a new sector providing
temporary windfalls, the Anglo disease was made possible by the
combination of technological progress in the financial world, the long
bond bull market created by Volcker's successful fight against
inflation and the successful promotion of the ideology of greed by the
right (with the timely fall of the Berlin Wall providing an additional
boost by discrediting the other extreme of the ideological spectrum).
The great middle classes created by the keynesian policies of the New
Deal have now been exploited for the past 30 years, and they are
depleted. The economy will need to find another, more real, way to grow
and prosper.
|