A local TV crew visited the "millionaire's town" and was shocked to find paupers instead. What lessons do millionaires of Maralal give to Africa?

The media has documented events that followed the money boom. The South Africa Star wrote: "Samburu tribesmen and their families are here on a spending spree: drinking, roasting meat, buying bicycles and clothes and flirting with women." A Mr Mathenge in Nanyuki observed: "... a variety of con men, masquerading as traders, doctors, preachers, fortune-tellers and soothsayers descended on Nanyuki moments after news spread that money had arrived..." The Standard reported in 2006: "The newly made millionaires were lured by what they considered modernity. Many owned several cell phones, TV sets, and vehicles.

 Samburu morans

Today, none of these items exist in Maralal, if they do they are in a state of disrepair." As often happens, the traditional approach of addressing African problems through the lenses of "big money" misses the whole point. The Organization for Economic Corporation and Development (OECD) countries has pumped an estimated $640 billion into sub-Saharan African countries since 1960. The G8 countries committed $60 billion towards fighting diseases and lately China has dedicated $5 billion in the next three years to Africa.

To see just what awaits us at the end of the tunnel, I propose that Jeffrey Sachs, Bono, Geldof, Bill Clinton and other proponents of "big money will fix Africa", take a short walk into Maralal.

If money was the key to solving problems, banks would send agents on the streets to supply money to afflicted individuals, instead we see that banks only offer money to individuals who successfully translate their "problems" into "opportunities." Money in itself is neutral. Big Money viewed as capital, has led to strategists (who depict Africa as trapped in a cycle of poverty) to argue for massive external inflows of big money as the only means of escape from poverty.

The alternativ, viewing money as a receipt for value, a creation and resultant effect of exchange between different parties; offers a chance to translate African problems into opportunities. The herder's predicament points at the fact that what Africa needs urgently is not money. We need a mindset that will engage in a rational response to the challenges that face the continent. I refer to this type of mindset as "capital," without which money or external solutions to the continent will come to naught. This explains in part the paradox of the continent being resource rich and yet full of poor people.

Investing in a "mindset" as capital calls for individuals to be creative from a commercial perspective on how they address their daily challenges. For example, if Kenyan architects visited Kibera, and came up with a design of housing units that guaranteed safety, sanitation and could be moved whenever the government wanted to relocate people, they would have solved a slum problem. It would make sense for banks to offer loans towards such a venture than simply having banks build houses for the poor. The architects and the bank would both make millions of shillings out of their good works, and turn what would otherwise be an insurmountable problem into an opportunity.

To this end, the actual worth of money lies in "exchange of value," and that is what we should be pushing Africans to do at village, national, continental and international level. The lesson from Samburu is that money is just paper, it is its underlying value that Africans ought to go for.

Unless the capital in form of the African human mind is exploited, all the do-good projects are destined to join in a resounding popping with the "bubble millionaires.