Its taken me a while to write this article. I
have been mulling over it forever, trying to find the words to introduce it. I
have not found them yet, well until just there.
It is what they teach you first at writing
school. The introduction is the most important part of any article. I really
should have attended more of those classes. Alas, they were always either too
early or too late; and I too am guilty of that most common of student's vices.
We believe we do not need to be taught English, or any writing.
Introduction, done and dusted. Now to my
article. I recently read Nekessa Opoti's article here about changing names at
marriage. I am one for the good old double barrel, not the Brangelina kind, but
rather in the fashion of Ogutu-Mwendwa. All the same, that is not what my
article is about. This is about changing place names, and while the double
barrel may not be possible here, it is just as controversial a subject.
All but the dullest among us (no offence
intended) will no doubt have heard that Bombay has vanished off the face of the
earth. Not in the fashion of Atlantis of course, but more in the sense that its
name has now been changed to Mumbai. There isn't any longer a Calcutta or a
Madras, but a Kolkata and Chennai. Also when you fly into South Africa, you no
longer have Johannesburg International as your entry point but rather OR Tambo
International. Closer home, the spirit of name changes has inspired the
graduation of Dr. Congo, although most Swahili speakers stubbornly insist on to
Wazaire rather than Wakongo.
That is the difference about place names.
Colonialism bequeathed the world a whole array of names that came into force
simply because the colonialists found they were easier on the tongue, or the
mind. Thus Kolkata became Calcutta, and our country got its name. This spirit of imposition of names informed a complaint I recently heard on a BBC show. The caller accused the
corporation of pandering to the vicissitudes of political correctness. Bombay
he insisted was the English name of the city of Mumbai, just as Paris is the
English rendition of the French capital, and Londres the French name for the
British capital. I do know a number of people who will insist on saying Paree
but they are in a distinct minority.
This explanation however is simplistic. Most
name changes are based on decisions, often controversial ones that are the
product of protracted negotiations. Moreover, although they are often matters of
political campaigns, they are in the end about identity. It is understandable
therefore why a majority rule South Africa would want, in throwing off the
chains of its history, to relieve itself of the names of men who subjugated
their ancestors and were heroes particularly for their acts against the black
population. Further, it seems especially following the death of such important
figures as Oliver Tambo, imperative that they be immortalised in an object of
national prominence. In many former colonies, these renaming ceremonies were
matters of immediacy on independence. The progression from German East Africa
to Tanganyika to Tanzania seems fairly obvious and uncontroversial, merely a
manifestation of facts on the ground. Similarly in Zimbabwe, none but the most
truculent settlers (there are many still) would imagine that Cecil Rhodes
should continue to lend his infamous name to that country.
These though are the minority cases. Most of the
time, there's a tug of war with large groups representing both opinions, a
retention of the present names, and a departure. In South Africa, the city of
Pretoria has as a compromise decided to keep the CBD as Pretoria while changing
the name of the city to Tshwane. Such decisions are based on the fact that just
as with people, name changes for cities and other such places are expensive
affairs. From new phonebooks and business cards, to new signs for every school,
business and road; it is an expensive undertaking. Still, it is one that many
think is necessary and one whose proponents argue pays back in a renewed sense
of pride and espirit de corps.
This is especially true of countries that are
hungering after a cathartic break with the past. Tones of the Germanic in St
Petersburg, made Leningrad so much easier on the Russian tongue. This desire
for a break may be residual like in the Indian cases occurring many years after
the fetters of colonialism were thrown off, but it often presages a country's
presence at the threshold of a new epoch. Is that where we Kenyans are?
My city was once called Port Florence, it has
long been redeemed from that shame but it still suffers location on a lake
named after the empress Victoria. Lakes Rudolf and Hannington are now
historical relics, and I am hoping that Lakes Victoria, Albert and Edward can
soon enjoy new leases of life. While we are at it, Jomo Kenyatta International
Airport could do with a name change, as could Moi International Airport in
Eldoret. I am still counting, two large hospitals, three universities and two
main arteries of Nairobi call out for redemption.
|
Port Florence, quite lame.
African heads should quit naming everything after them, all those MOI schools need to abolish thosenames, especially if a leader has nothing positive to show for his rule!
Let the airforce name planes after them. Academic institutions need to look for persons of intellect if they must name after people.
Oh, and am the brangellina type!