Home
Africa Needs Benevolent Dictators PDF Print E-mail
Written by Ombuya E. Okongo   
Wednesday, 12 August 2009

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says she is carrying a new message of tough love to Africa. But changing the message is not enough. Africa's leaders are used to talk. It doesn't mean they will walk the walk. In Ghana last month, President Barack Obama pointed out that at the beginning of the 1960s, Kenya, the country of his father's birth, "had a per capita economy larger than South Korea's." Recently when Kenyans from the diaspora gathered in Boston to discuss how they can be more involved in the governance of their country, the question of why South Korea had overtaken Kenya came up. One cannot look at South Korea's history and say that it's too different from Kenya or many African countries. In the last 50 years, the Asian nation has had corruption, poor governance and violence and dictators - all major ingredients of the perils of the African continent.

As the conventioneers, most of who were born in the last half century, struggled to find the answer, Ali Mazrui, a renowned 76-year-old Kenyan-born professor at the State University of New York, came to the rescue. The answer, he said, was in the nature of the African dictator.

"Asian dictators tend to benevolent, while African dictators tend to be malevolent," Mazrui said.

parkchunghee.png
Park Chung-hee South Korean President 1917 to 1979
Photo: Wikimedia Commons
Mazrui explained that unlike African strong men, Asian dictators often put the interests of their countries first. That is perhaps why South Korea's economy grew tremendously between 1963 and 1979, even as the world criticized President Park Chung-hee as an iron-fisted dictator.

Learning the nature of the African dictator would have helped Clinton reshape her message to the continent. The Obama administration should have noted that the president's tough talk in Ghana about corruption and disregard of democracy had no effect on the leadership of the continent - the dictators were still firmly in business when Clinton left Washington, DC.

The Obama administration and the West in general need to understand that the African dictator no longer flinches when an American or a European opens his mouth. The African Big Man has learned over the years that there are no consequences for his actions. As Zimbabwe has proven, sanctions do not deter the African dictator.

What Africa needs are new, practical ideas. Yes, imposing a U.S. ban on corrupt individuals, as Clinton announced at the beginning of her tour in Nairobi, Kenya, signals a different approach. But European countries like Britain have tried this approach in vain over the last few years, as Africa's corrupt have found alternatives in the Middle East and Asia, where they are less likely to be censured.

In Kenya Clinton also asked youth to fight corruption with technology.

"There ought to be a way to use interactive media, especially the Internet obviously, and some of the new vehicles like Twitter, etc., to report in real time allegations of corruption," said Clinton.

But the citizens of most of the countries on her itinerary do not have easy access to the Internet. Also, technology is useless where there is disregard of the rule of law. In the words of Nuhu Ribadu, the former Nigerian anti-corruption czar now living in exile after an attempt on his life, in Africa "when you fight corruption, it fights back."

Because dictators tend to respond to opposition with savagery, violent uprisings have only left Africans in a worse state than before war. Perhaps the continent's hope lies in persuading its dictators to emulate their Asian counterparts. While historically Asian dictators have been as oppressive as African ones, they have built infrastructure that have helped their citizens move products around quickly, and trade amongst themselves. This freedom to move easily seems to have helped Asians a great deal.

Rather than call for a total end of corruption, we need to be practical and ask African leaders to reduce corruption enough for citizens to enhance their livelihood. We should let African leaders know that most Africans do not need handouts from the government. All they need is to be enabled. In my birthplace of southwestern Kenya, for example, rotting avocados fall from trees like cluster bombs while there is a shortage in Nairobi. My mother and other farmers in the area would have made a good living if a benevolent dictator had constructed a highway to enable them to get to Nairobi and back on the same day.

Again, Africa leaders have proven immune to criticism. Civil wars have led to failed states. It is time to try a safer, more practical approach.

Ombuya E. Okongo
About the author:
Edwin is a widely published Kenyan journalist, humorist, memoirist and satirist in the United States.




Digg!Del.icio.us!Google!Facebook!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Trackback(0)
Comments (5)add
0
OMG
written by Ndege , August 12, 2009
I'm clinging to the 'humourist' in the note about the author. Otherwise: horrible, absolutely horrible. smilies/sad.gif
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
What?
written by Jane Ndima , August 12, 2009
First of all, I am sorry to say this by Ali Mazrui is very "tribal": he is of the old politics.

Second, I supposed to you that human rights violations of Asian "benevolent" leaders are of no consequence. Where is the benevolence in that? I am really disappointed that a very cliched-attention getting article has been published on these pages.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
562
...
written by jmaruru , August 12, 2009
The truth is, Africa, shall I begin with Kenya, needs a very powerful change such as is possible only through a revolution. A revolution can only succeed under the leadership of a very strong leader.

The problem is that strong leaders, tend to get intoxicated in power, from Alexander the Great to Robert Mugabe.

The truth is that Kenya would likely not be facing half the economic problems it faces now if there was a strong leader who was willing to make a stand, make changes, for the good of the economy and the people, without necessarily worrying about popular vote in the next general election.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
62
Reactions from our FB fanpage
written by Imagine Duty Editor , August 14, 2009
Cut and pasted below are reactions on this article from our Facebook fanpage.
1st Reaction:
We need strong men to build within our weakened democracies strong institutions....not benevolent dictators (there is no such thing anyway)

2nd Reaction:
Strong institutions, definately. Strong men in an African leadership context?= dictator. Dictator creating strong instutions for the benefit of all = benevolent dictator.

3rd Reaction:
I agree with the 2nd reaction. We need strong institutiions that will stand the test of time. But we also need strong leadership to make sure all respect these institutions - and by all I mean even the leaders themselves.

For example, look at our institutions. As they stand, they look messy and unworkable. But if you look deeper, it is more to do with people ... Read Morerunning them than the institutions themselves. All three branches of government over time have colluded to abuse them. In the end, we are left with institutions that have no credibility or will to hold each other accountable as the constitution envisages. That is our dilemma!
If we get a new constitution, how long before we rundown whatever institutions it will come-up with? Will that generation have to write a new constitution? Does it not then boil down to we Kenyans as individuals been the problem, rather than a written set of rules?

4th Reaction
I believe and continue to do so, that our institutions, under whatever capacity can not be run by politicians. For whatever its worth, most of them are either failures in there previous engagements or lawyers. Look at our members of parliament and count the number of lawyers, benefactors from lineages or failures of past organizations and you get ... Read More95%! Yes we need strong institutions but we need strong willed individuals to run them. We need a STRONG and selfless leader to make the change happen. This is Africa people. But its Africa in the way we want it not the way others see it!

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
satire? Humor? Sarcacism? Pragmatism?
written by babesnye , August 24, 2009
Please tell me this is a joke? While I agree that something needs to be done about corruption, is this what it has come to? Negotiating with those hungry malevolent politicians to just easy on corruption so that we can advance? I just think that as pragmatic as it sounds, this is just a bad joke!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Write comment

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
Last Updated ( Thursday, 13 August 2009 )
 
< Prev   Next >


Login/Register

Login/ Register

click to subscribe
feed image

Contact

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it for content related questions and suggestions

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it for republication enquiries

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it to report faults or offensive comment.


Archives | About Us | KenyaImagine How To | Privacy Policy | ContactUs | Join KenyaImagine |  Advertise Here| Legal Disclaimer | Terms & Conditions | Directory
rss-2.png

 

Copyright 2009 KenyaImagine.com, the KenyaImagine logo and KenyaImagine.com are trademarks of  The Imagine Company