Can one shape norms and institutions to build peace and development?
I take a skeptical view of training programs that purport to reduce
violence and 'peacebuild'. After a visit to a rural training center in
Liberia, however, I may stand corrected.
Liberia's national
demobilization and reintegration program came with a 'weapons test'--if
you had a weapon, you got demobilized, including a package of household
items, cash, and a voucher for a vocational training program.
Not
surprisingly, more than one group of ex-combatants (or 'excoms' as they
refer to themselves) were relieved of their weapons by their
commanders, who distributed them as patronage to others.
One such
group of excoms, deprived of the demobilization program, were illegally
tapping rubber trees in a private plantation. There are dozens of such
groups across the country, and some are feared as a security threat. To
deal with the problem, the UK government granted funds to an NGO to
start an agricultural training center for the youth in this 'hotspot'.
About
400 of the excoms--including perhaps 20 or 30 women--took up residence
at the agricultural center. They are being trained in animal husbandry,
and plantation agriculture. They also receive literacy and numeracy
training, since many never had a chance to attend school. They also
participate in conflict management and analysis training taught by
NEPI , the National Ex-Combatants Peace-building Initiatives, the group of excoms led by Johnson Borh, whom I mentioned in a previous article.
The
story these trainers tell is a remarkable one. The first few weeks of
classes, they were woken up several times an hour to settle conflicts
and stop fights. Violence had become the norm for these young men and
women--the standard response to any conflict. Inside and outside of
class, NEPI has tried to instill new norms of managing disputes. Three
months later, the trainers can go days or weeks without being woken up
once.
The second day of our stay we woke up to a small riot.
Supplies of food and soap had been delayed from the capital, and the
excoms had taken to the yard, yelling angrily with the staff and
refusing to attend classes. Johnson stood in the thick of them,
surrounded by two dozen angry youth, hashing it out.
Within an
hour, the youth had settled back to their quarters, their elected
leaders were holding a consultation, and were preparing to present a
list of grievances to the school administration. Nothing was broken,
few egos were bruised, and the excoms' anger and frustration was being
channeled into a peaceful and institutional process.
Such an outcome, Johnson tells me, would have been unthinkable just two
moths ago. But they haave succeeded in creating new norms of behavior
and dispute.
Perhaps the only disappointing aspect of the program
is the cost. Housing, outfitting, and training 600 youth for six months
is an expensive endeavor. Few vocational and agricultural institutes
exist outside Monrovia, and so the buildings had to be constructed at
additional expense. True, at the end of the program, the buildings will
be turned over to the Ministry of Agriculture as a permanent training
institute, but its sustainability as a free and charitable institute is
doubtful.
What we hope to do is evaluate a few different models
of peace building--intensive and expensive, and cheap and
plentiful--and examine the alternative impacts. I find the development
of new norms of behavior and social institutions to be completely
fascinating, and much more malleable than I imagined. The implications
for the way we think about economic behavior and decision making are
profound.
Dr Blattman is an Assistant Professor of Political Science & Economics at Yale University, and a Visiting Fellow at the Center for Global Development. He worked in the war-torn north of neighbouring Uganda. He publishes the Chris Blattman blog .
|
It sounds beautiful but as a historian, I am a bit sceptical...
Alexander