This is the most lawless war of our generation. All wars of
aggression lack legitimacy, but no conflict in recent memory has
witnessed such mounting layers of illegality as the current one in
Somalia.
Violations of the UN charter and of international humanitarian
law are regrettably commonplace in our age, and they abound in the
carnage that the world is allowing to unfold in Mogadishu, but this war
has in addition explicitly violated two UN security council
resolutions. To complete the picture, one of these resolutions
contravenes the charter itself.
The complete impunity with which
Ethiopia and the transitional Somali government have been allowed to
violate these resolutions explains the ruthlessness of the military
assaults that have been under way for six weeks now. The details of the
atrocities being committed were formally acknowledged by a western
government for the first time when Germany, which holds the current EU
presidency, had its ambassador to Somalia, Walter Lindner, write a
tough letter - made public on Wednesday - to Somalia's president,
Abdullahi Yusuf.
The letter condemned the indiscriminate use of
air strikes and heavy artillery in Mogadishu's densely populated areas,
the raping of women , the deliberate blocking of urgently needed food
and humanitarian supplies, and the bombing of hospitals. This is a
relentless drive to terrify and intimidate civilians belonging to clans
from whose ranks fighters are challenging the occupation.
There
was a time when security council resolutions were hallowed in most of
the world, as for example resolution 242 demanding the return of
occupied Palestine territory in exchange for peace. But in our new
world order, the powerful decide which UN resolutions are passed, and
whether they need to be honoured. So the United States, which was
violating the UN arms embargo on Somalia, rushed through another
resolution in December that it thought would better serve US goals -
and then proceeded to violate that one as well.
The new
resolution forbade neighbouring countries from being part of the
regional peacekeeping force the security council authorised for
Somalia; but Ethiopia went much further and unilaterally invaded, with
the covert assistance of the US - which also joined the war by bombing
Somalia.
This December resolution actually contravened the
charter itself, because it made the security council the aggressor and
turned a clearly peaceful situation into war. The resolution linked the
Islamic Courts government to international terrorism and mandated
peacekeeping force, on the basis of chapter VII of the UN charter, to
address the "threat to international peace and security" that Somalia
posed - when every independent account, including Chatham House's on
Wednesday, indicated that the country was experiencing its first peace
and security since 1991.
The resolution paved the way for the
Ethiopian invasion that has led to the bitter conflict that many
independent analysts, including those at a meeting in Addis Ababa
organised by Ethiopia's Inter-Africa Group, had warned would be the
inevitable result. A government imposed through force by arch enemy
Ethiopia was never going to hold sway.
The long silence and the
refusal even now to announce measures that might arrest this slaughter
mark the lowest point in the big powers' abdication of the
"Responsibility to Protect" mandate - adopted, with British leadership,
at a summit-level meeting of the security council two years ago. The
world's most impoverished people are now being ripped to shreds with no
effort whatsoever to get the perpetrators to desist.
A huge
campaign must be launched to press western governments to end this
slaughter, which is almost entirely the work of those in control of the
country. The European Union warned a month ago that war crimes might
have been committed in an assault on the capital last month - in which
the EU could be complicit because of its large-scale support for those
accused of the crimes. Human Rights Watch has documented how Kenya and
Ethiopia had turned this region into Africa's own version of Guantánamo
Bay, replete with kidnappings, extraordinary renditions, secret prisons
and large numbers of "disappeared": a project that carries the Made in
America label. Allowing free rein to such comprehensive lawlessness is
a stain on all those who might have, at a minimum, curtailed it.
Work
must begin to derail the astounding proposal from the United Nations
secretary general, Ban Ki-Moon, which is to be discussed by the
security council in mid-June. He would like to mount a UN-sanctioned
"coalition of the willing" to enforce peace and restore order in
Somalia - in other words, the UN would help Ethiopia and the United
States achieve what their own illegal military interventions have
failed to accomplish: the entrenchment of a client regime that lacks
any popular support. Such an operation is unlikely to succeed in any
event, but it could further threaten the turbulent Horn of Africa,
which is already teetering on the brink of chaos.
The Somali
government is busy crying "al-Qaida" at every turn and offering
lucrative deals to oil companies, in a bid to entice greater western
support. But this war was lost long ago. In turning to the arch enemy
Ethiopia, the transitional government's fate was sealed: the nation
will not abide an Ethiopian-US occupation.
Only a political
solution will resolve this crisis. Africa must step up to the plate and
show spine and leadership in a drive to protect its civilians, and work
with Europe and the UN to convince the US to swiftly terminate its
latest destabilising adventure.
· Salim Lone, was the
spokesman for the UN mission in Iraq after the 2003 invasion.
|
There's a lesson here, which Saddam and Zenawi are shouting out at the top of their voices. There's no alliance of evil that will keep you safe after your useful days are past.