Editorial: President-elect Barack Obama PDF Print E-mail
Written by Updates   
Wednesday, 05 November 2008

Senator Barack Obama has been declared the 44th President Elect of the United States. The Kenyan government has declared tomorrow, Thursday 6th November, a public holiday.

Senator Obama has received a call conceding defeat from Senator McCain, who himself gave a very gracious and dignified concessionary speech to his supporters, and from serving President George Bush. Obama has just given a rousing speech, enjoining the USA and the world in a reformist mission.

Global news networks continue to ponder the ramifications of this victory and what it means for the world affairs, and the present economic crisis. The fact that he won such a commanding victory, latest figures show a margin in excess of 4 million votes, and his party a commanding majority in Congress, permits a level of reform that would otherwise be unlikely. More people, both in absolute and percentage terms, have voted Barack Obama than voted either George Bush or even Bill Clinton.

The USA's new chief executive's victory is all the more special for its emphatic dismissal of the imaginary barriers that had been placed in his way by his detractors. Where he was proclaimed the most liberal senator in US history, he went on to win states that had been defined as solidly Republican. His problem with the Latino voters proved illusory as he went on to win Florida, and more importantly to win Cuban American votes there in spite of a strong campaign to link him to socialism and the Cuban government.

Those rural white voters, who it was said would never vote a black candidate, proved to be more flexible than the pundits suggested. By the time the setting sun had reached  Democratic party bastions on the West Coast of the United States, voters in Appalachia and America's industrial heartland had given Senator Obama an unassailable lead. In Ohio, in Pennsylvania, in Virginia and in North Carolina, he shattered these barriers and won more than white Democratic candidates like Kerry and Gore had done in 2000 and in 2004. Even in deep rural counties, those coloured an emphatic scarlet on the electoral map, even where he did not win, the Illinois Senator posted numbers many percentage points higher than his recent predecessors on the party ticket had done. He had persuaded America, just as he had previously persuaded the world.

In news rooms now, pundits echo Obama's lauding of his campaign team and its leaders, David Plouffe and David Axelrod. Their tactics and the obdurate dedication to the Howard-Dean-inspired 50 state strategy won Obama a victory that recalls his 2004 Democratic Party rejection of the division of the USA into red and blue states.

This campaign strategy pioneered the use of the new technology, and massive grassroots organisation, both to build a movement across ethnic, religious, class and political fissures and to raise more money than any political campaign has in the history of the United States. It is sure to be studied and embraced by political parties and movements around the world seeking to build broad coalitions based on ideas and a desire for genuine reform. Even from a more traditional viewpoint, the discipline and organisation of the campaign, its crafting of a sturdy quilt from its constituent parts both in the gruelling Primary Season and in the General Election campaign was exemplary and in such difficult conditions as Obama ran under, a truly outstanding accomplishment.

The unashamedly cosmopolitan and globally popular Obama, a politician who refuses the confinements of ethnicity, race, class and religion, has raised hopes for a mending of fences between the United States and the rest of the world. Asia looks to his childhood in Indonesia, the Islamic world to his middle name and time in an Islamic country, Africa to his father's heritage, Europe to his dedication to a universal humanism, Christians to his belief in a caring, responsible and transformative faith, African Americans to his experence of discrimination and poor Americans everywhere to his experience of want and exclusion. All these hope that this global experience of his will rally energy and resources and create a common purpose as the nations of men work to tackle the global food crisis, the clash called the War on Terror, global poverty, the climate change crisis and the increasingly frightening effects of the global economic meltdown.

His appeals for a more participatory democracy and  for reform are refreshing, especially coming at a time when the global economy is revisiting its faith in unhindered free market capitalism and states are taking a keener interest in participating their economies. The global challenges we are facing will benefit from his background as a scholar, especially if as his campaign effort indicated, he adopts a pragmatic approach that is responsive to the advise of experts and intellectuals.

It is this pragmatism  of Obama's also that leads to a hope that even those elements of his present policy platform we find problematic can be refined and even reversed. Whether it is on PEFA, trade, farm subidies, AFRICOM or the War on Afghanistan (and Pakistan) we can hope that the new President will be sensitive to the strong sentiments against his positions, and to just how harmful these are for Kenya and Africa. We do as we must confess a divergence between our needs and those of his constituents, but the celebrations around the world today evince an assumption of global solidarity around shared values.

We have chosen hope.


Updates
About the author:
kenyaImagine editors will keep you updated on the latest news in Kenya and the world. Write to us if you are interested in being featured in our updates: This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it




Digg!Del.icio.us!Google!Facebook!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Trackback(0)
Comments (3)add
270
obama and FISA
written by Stephen Wanyama , November 06, 2008
Obama has shown flexibility for sure,

On July 9, 2008, the Senate easily voted down amendments to the House bill and passed it unchanged 69-28. Both Harry Reid the Senate Majority Leader (in how the bill was brought up) and the 2008 presumptive Democratic Presidential nominee Barack Obama (in not only not leading any opposition to the legislation but in fact supporting it) were instrumental in the passage of a bill codifying the power of the government to spy on its citizens without a warrant, sanctioning the illegal activities of telecoms, and hiding from public view the extent of the Bush Administration’s lawlessness in this area.


Google Obama, FISA.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
270
Rahm Emmanuel
written by Stephen Wanyama , November 06, 2008
Also useful, what does the appointment of Rahm Emmanuel mean? Alexander Cockburn here on Counterpunch explains.

At a recent meeting of House Republicans, members ruminating on the disastrous state of their party reportedly murmured with gloomy jocularity about the administration of "President Hastert". A CounterPuncher familiar with the proceedings reports "they were only half joking".

Yet, as they contemplate political ruin in next year's election, these Republicans can take solace in the fact that, if defeated, their replacements may not differ in any meaningful way on important issues of the day. That at least is the hope and dream of Democratic apparatchik Rahm Emmanuel and the corporate toadies he represents. Ominously, Emmanuel, a relict of the Clinton White House, heads the Democratic National Campaign Committee.

As such, he decides which candidates for the House should get money and other support from the national party. At a time when any fool can see that the public hates the war more this month than last, and will hate it even more next month and the month after that, Emmanuel is doing his best to recruit candidates, preferably rich ones, guaranteed to eschew vocal opposition to the war.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -1
0
obama and the middle east
written by truth-seeker , November 06, 2008
One thing I wonder about, was Obama's comment to AIPAC that Jerusalem is the single undivided capital of Israel sincere, did he really believe that? Is he more of an extremist on Israel than even George W Bush?

This is important because whether or not the Middle East situation can be improved depends on whether or not Obama is an honest broker, and not just another betrayer from the left like Clinton and Bliar. As the US erupted in celebration, the Israelis bombed Gaza. Nice.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Write comment

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 05 November 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >


Login/Register

Login/ Register

click to subscribe
feed image

Contact

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it for content related questions and suggestions

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it for republication enquiries

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it to report faults or offensive comment.


Archives | About Us | KenyaImagine How To | Privacy Policy | ContactUs | Join KenyaImagine |  Advertise Here| Legal Disclaimer | Terms & Conditions | Directory
rss-2.png

 

Copyright 2009 KenyaImagine.com, the KenyaImagine logo and KenyaImagine.com are trademarks of  The Imagine Company