Why Mutuma Mathiu is so wrong PDF Print E-mail
Written by 094825   
Monday, 08 January 2007

My senses were assaulted this weekend by an article of Mutuma Mathiu, formerly one of the reasons I would fight to ensure I read the Sunday Nation before my parents could get their hands on it. After having travelled the world, and suffered the scars that make for journalistic fame and a wealth of anecdotes to enliven any party, he has been awarded his laurels as Managing Editor of the Sunday Nation. His travails in Tanzania endeared him to many a Kenyan heart, even if we did not have a clue about what happened there. I am something of an unabashed fan of his, but when writing here, he has obviously lost the plot.

His piece starts with a mea culpa in which he details the length and depth of his Faustian moment, and his struggle against his heart. He further confesses to a desire to ‘sink back' into the peasantry, a romantic concept very much in tune with the rest of his article. On he goes, expressing his delirium at his continued association with the poor:

"Giving vent to my communistic tendencies, I am writing at a workshop where I have spent some quality time with painters, open air mechanics and people generally of that ilk. "

What does he mean when he talks of 'people of that ilk'? This reminds one of Muthoni Thangwa's pieces on Karen Blixen and the latter's charitable musings on black people in her books; but still I wonder if the condescendion is merely peculiar to my perception. Fortune delivers and I am saved my bother by the next paragraphs, as Mephisto hands the receipt over to our intrepid scribe.

After engaging himself in a spot of circumlocution, our brave knight finds he has exonerated himself of xenophobia and related charges by positive association; he has after all been a student of Ugandan refugees; for six years even. Thus cleansed, he charges and delivers the clincher, declaring that Nairobi's population mix has so changed that Eastleigh is now, for all intents and purposes a part of Somalia!

Still, he finds himself in total agreement with Foreign Minister Tuju's pronouncements on the plight of Somali refugees; in defiance of international law. He lists as his reasons the allegations of an Al Qaeda presence in Somalia (only to admit that they could be baseless), and the possibility of setting up ‘safe havens' inside Somalia wherein the refugees might be sheltered. He even finds time to ssuggest that it is inconceivable that Kenya throw her borders wide open and subject the refugees to a perfunctory screening. To nail his case, he closes by suggesting that Ethiopia has done the region a favor by taking care of a problem ‘that was threatening to spiral out of control.'

No one has suggested that Kenya put herself at risk by laying herself open to all manner of refugees. We have never done so, but steadily through the years we have had innumerable refugees come across our borders. That we are now expressing alarm at this, just because the Americans have labeled the Union of Islamic Courts (UIC) as terrorists, exposes not just our cultural and political enslavement, but also our failure to understand the difference between Kenya's national interests and the interests of select cliques in the Western establishment for whom waging a war against Islam is beneficial.

Somalia has had 16 years of turmoil. During that same time we have hosted these same MPs that now are being arrested, plus hundreds more, including a free-to-air no-holds-barred fight at a peace conference. We have opened our borders and airports to Somali traders and business-people, we have hosted the very warlords in Nairobi that destroyed the country all these years. Not once during all that time did Mutuma Mathiu or Raphael Tuju fear for Kenya, until the Americans put the sticker, and said 'suicide bomber'. Now we must obediently quake with fear, close our borders, close our airports and even harrass students from Somaliland which is an innocent and very peaceful by-stander in all this fitna.Â

I concede it may be necessary to raise two mitigating factors. The first, that Mr Mathiu may be no longer at ease with a job at a mere Weekend Paper, nay that he is after something higher, perhaps even the Group job or the Managing Directorship. Maybe someone whispered to him that it would help his prospects if he disrobed himself of his sympathies for rational, or leftist sentiments and clothed his work instead with the raiment of privilege and power.

Also exculpatory, would be the fact that the judicial pronouncements of the Union of Islamic Courts may have had a severely deleterious effect on the miraa crop of his village, and particularly of that blitheful Georgian small-holding that he wishes to retire to. Indeed the ban on miraa in Somalia pronounced by the UIC may well be seen as a breach of the peace by the average Kenyan farmer in some districts, or among the Wilson Airport industry that has seen traffic dwindle since the Ethiopians and their Anglo- Saxon support decided to place Somalia in a state of exception outside international law.

It must be noted further in Mathiu's defence that we live in a world where language has been transformed in the media so that we are terrorised even by the mention of the word Islam. That this terror should segue into an irrationality where Islamic Clerics in general are found - even by the otherwise discerning eye - to be rabid terrorists, was to be expected.

That said, there has been no sign, not even an accusation by its enemies that the UIC was anything dangerous in itself. Further, it is improbable that they would have posed any danger to Kenya. Those who believe they had a hand in the Kikambala and Nairobi bombings would do well to ask themselves why these attacks have not continued, and what specific goals the Al Qaeda operatives carrying them out had. Why did they relent after two attacks? Did they achieve what was wanted? Does anyone really bear against Kenya a grudge of this nature? Such a schema that conflates everything Islamic with terror is not just silly but plainly irresponsible, especially when wielded in such powerful hands as Mutuma Mathiu's.

Cheerleading this Ethiopian hubris is helping them as they light up our corner of the world. Accepting wholesale the assertions of the same intelligence organizations that fed and guided the Somali warlords, not to mention wilfully beguiled the world into believing Iraq had WMD, is poor journalism, and if this study by Robert Pape is to be taken into account, could lead to a serious deterioration of our national security.

Kenya must stay neutral, supporting neither the Ethiopians, the Somalian Transitional Government, nor the Union of Courts, but taking the part of an honest arbiter and bringing the Somali troubles to a diplomatic solution. The stance taken by Mutuma Mathiu and Minister Tuju in openly attacking the UIC and their backers ignores the fact that religion itself may be all that could re-bind this failed state together.

One hopes that Somalia and Mathiu can redeem themselves.Â

Addition linksÂ


094825
About the author:




Digg!Del.icio.us!Google!Facebook!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Trackback(0)
Comments (16)add
0
...
written by aeichener , January 08, 2007
I am undecided whether Mutuma Mathiu is just coyly flirting and fishing for compliments in his first paragraphs, or is maybe genuinely self-critical. Hmm ?

As to Somali refugees, the temptation to use the notorious "The boat if full!" argument is of course imminent. As would be a reference to the tens of thousands of kits own IDPs that Kenya has been unwilling to care for (I might myself dedicate an article to their plight).

As to racial clichés and prejudices, I think that male Somalis are more useful in Kenya and less noxious than they would be in Somalia. :-)
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by emmo , January 08, 2007
One is reminded of Hannah Arendt's book Imperialism. In Chapter 5, titled "The Decline of the Nation-State and the End of the Rights of Man."

She writes of
'the formulation - which inextricably links the fates of the rights of man and the modern national state, such that the end of the latter necessarily implies the obsolescence of the former - should be taken seriously. The paradox here is that precisely the figure that should have incarnated the rights of man par excellence, the refugee, constitutes instead the radical crisis of this concept. "The concept of the Rights of man," Arendt writes, "based on the supposed existence of a human being as such, collapsed in ruins as soon as those who professed it found themselves for the first time before men who had truly lost every other specific quality and connection except for the mere fact of being humans." In the nation-state system, the so-called sacred and inalienable rights of man prove to be completely unprotected at the very moment it is no longer possible to characterize them as rights of the citizens of a state.


Seems to me the polemic raised against the Somali has been so efficiently executed, and met such deathly silence that many people do not even realise just how wrong it is to close the border to refugees fleeing actual violence. These efforts are definitely helped along by the whole clash of civilisations, 'Christian v. Muslim' tune, which we all seem over-eager to dance to.

Mr Mathiu's sentiments about Somalis in Eastleigh are characteristic of the Kenya Police who will hound those poor sods to hell and back, ebelieving all the while that they are aliens, even when they are not.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
What to do with refugees
written by aeichener , January 08, 2007
Not having yet strolled leisurely through Eastleigh at daytime or at daytime (and not yet having my Kenyan firearms certificate, either), I shall reserve judgement on Eastleigh and its noble population. But it might suffice to state that native-and-bred Kenyan criminals did and do not need any lessons from refugees, as the majority of crime reports show.

There are only two humane solutions to an inflow of refugees (blocking the border may appear as a measure of last resort sometimes, but even when is is felt necessary, it certainly is not "humane"smilies/wink.gif:

- One solution is a rapid integration of the newly arrived, the first as well (and especially) as the second generation. Greece and Turkey have done so very well after 1922, as much as Germany after 1945/46; the Arab states have done the exact contrary after 1948 and 1967.

- The second solution is to keep the refugees in temporary camps, but to make *all* possible effort (civil and if necessary, military) in order to repatriate them as soon and as efficiently and, yes, as humanely) as possible. Not the "fence them with barbed wire or thornbushes and forget" attitude.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by aeichener , January 09, 2007
Compared to a roach, even a dwarf is a giant. Probably that's why Mathiu's problematic article still appears intellectually gigantic when compared to the coprolith from Macharia Gaitho here:

Macharia Gaitho

A Kenyan editor true to form.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Locking them out
written by Amir Ibrahim , January 09, 2007
Interesting that you should mention 'the camp' Alex. A place where such persons as refugees are excluded from society even as they suffer inclusion in it. Where they can enjoy their freedom from death and freedom from Kenya all at once.

The twin solutions of naturalisation and repatriation may not be applicable in the sense that the refugee here wants neither. Also that in the absence of a Somali state there isn't a body politic to repatriate them to.

On the refugee problem in the Arab nations the reason these countries persist in denying the refugees citizen rights is that this would preclude their right of return and therefore lend Israel and its violent Naqba an international legitimacy. Without the refugees, Israel will continue to run unchallenged and conquer the whole of Palestine.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
the Revenge of the Miraa Lobby
written by emmo opoti , January 09, 2007
The Americans must have invested a lot in this man's ignorance. Three cheers to Faux News, and school is out eternally. Let's burn all the books and lobotomies on the NHIF tab.

As bad commentaries go this piece takes the biscuit. Any Rhoda at a pub in Ongata Rongai could have penned it.He starts off swiftly without any justification whatsoever calling the Union of Islamic Courts, the Somali Taliban, he goes on again without evidence to claim that the UIC consorted with international terrorists, claims even the USA itself is not making. But the whole of that must have been lost in the translation.

The power of Faux News and the dissemination of disinformation. :twisted: On the Taliban: Does Mr Gaitho have information the rest of the world is unaware of about the international terrorist activities of The Taliban, or is it his position that America's enemies are his own?

Is it that the Kenyan Press is unable to discuss Somalia without resorting to racist talk? How is it that Somalis had a hand in the bombings of 1998 and Kikambala? And even if it did, where is the link to the UIC? What came first Mr Gaitho, Somali threats of a Jihad or Ethiopia's encroachment on her borders? Did the UIC make the TNG impotent or was it already unable to exert its authority over the country?

As he castigates the Kenyan governemnt for doing nothing, our dull writer talks of Somalia sliding into anarchy under the UIC 'while Kenya did nothing'. He goes on to draw a parallel with the Idi Amin regime. How did this get past his editors? Where are the parallels? Genocide in Rwanda, Amin and the UIC? What is the connection?

The unabashed fount of ignorance spouts on citing that,
We remain helpless as the Sudanese regime sponsors a racial and religious, Arab and Islamic, genocide against its own citizens.
and then finishes off proclaiming that the Janjaweed have brought law and order to Sudan, but that we do not seek law and order from terrorist despots. Is one allowed now to write just anything in the Daily Nation?


Really does he read anything?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Contrast
written by aeichener , January 09, 2007
There are good and thorough articles, too.
Here, John Mbaria in the East African weekly:

http://www.nationmedia.com/eas...801078.htm
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
What\'s he plu*ging?
written by Dan Kihote , January 09, 2007
Here is the oldest trick in the book.

Emmo and the good judge spotted it immeadiately.

I have no doubt that Mutuma Mathiu is a good writer. He is using a game of bluff here to whip up publicity. Has he written a new book or is he hoping to stand in the forthcoming elections?

The main body of his article is pure manure and I feel dirty to even think that we cannot avoid giving people of "his ilk" the oxygen of publicity
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
John Mbaria
written by Amir Ibrahim , January 09, 2007
Exceleent piece. Wonder why he does not write in the mainstream press. Then again maybe the powers that be need to excite the population into a terror about Somalia?

Really Gaitho's piece is so bad it looks like intentional propaganda.

For me, like for Emmo above, the danger is the fact that trouble in Somalia is NOT in Kenya's interest at all!!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
The EU on US airstrikes
written by emmo opoti , January 09, 2007
EU criticises US terror and Lynn Wanyeki at the East African proves once more that it is not a mainstream paper for the Kenyan rabble, read here
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
John Mbaria
written by aeichener , January 09, 2007
But I would certainly say that the "East African" is not un-mainstream?

And Mbaria is one of the more prolific investigative journalists in Kenya; in the past e.g., he has written about KWS, and was very critical about a perceived "white mafia" of self-appointed supreme animal lovers who would decide what is good for the natives.

You can try to reach him at jmbaria at nation.co.ke . Maybe he is so un-mainstream as to actually answer his emails? :wink:
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
The East African
written by emmo opoti , January 10, 2007
That is what the East African is for. My mother always went to work early, so I was sure to get it before anyone else would read it.

Even as newspapers like the Daily Nation, and Sunday Nation have gone down the drain, it has stood proud and tall. Mutuma Mathiu, Gitau Warigi, Kwamchetsi Makokha, Magesha Ngwiri and Macharia Gaitho were in the distant past great writers. Now...

The only writers I respect in Kenya,
Phillip Ochieng' -for being an anarchist
Muthoni Wanyeki - writes well most days
Charles Obbo Onyango- always brilliant
Kamau Ngotho- I believe the best investigative reporter around
and more than anyone else, for consistently being up there, Jaindi Kisero.

Why does the Nation Group without fail will put their best work into the East African? Are they privy to some data on Kenyan reading habits? If the choice of topics for debate, and the wealth of knowledge Kenyans enjoy on specific issues in the virtual world of the net are anything to go by, they seem to be vindicated every day.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
the beautiful press
written by Amir Ibrahim , January 11, 2007
Being as this is the American Century, I will post here a Glenn Beck link to show what perhaps motivates the likes of Macharia Gaitho and Mutuma Mathiu.

Puntuated with a whole plethora of quotable quotes you will find the following,

For instance, during a November 14, 2006, interview with Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN), who recently became the first Muslim ever elected to Congress, Beck said:
"I have been nervous about this interview with you, because what I feel like saying is, 'Sir, prove to me that you are not working with our enemies.' "


Beck claimed that there are three reasons that an illegal immigrant "comes across the border in the middle of the night":
"One, they're terrorists; two, they're escaping the law; or three, they're hungry. They can't make a living in their own dirtbag country


During a discussion of the "politically correct world we live in,"
claimed that Braille on walls (used to identify rooms for blind people) "drives me out of my mind." He then said, "Just to piss them [blind people] off, I'm going to put in Braille on the coffee pot ... 'Pot is hot


Check it out, it cannot be scripted, ABC a major American network then hires the man to co-present Good Morning! We are not immune, Check it out at Mashada
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
the ilk of Glenn Beck
written by Nekessa , January 11, 2007
He is not worthy of comment. I was shocked he was not taken off air for questioning Keith Ellison as he did. I expected that kind of newsreporting on FoxNews who even after all stations had relayed the results of the midterm elections waited an extra hour before declaring that the Democrats were in control of the house.

When Democrat Tim Johnson had a stroke, everyone watched to see his condition, since his retirement or death would result in a Republican taking his place, cutting short the Dems victory.

Mainstream media in most of the world has forgotten its responsibility. Here is a piece on why the Kenyan Media needs a Watchdog.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Journalistic Ethics
written by aeichener , January 11, 2007
Kenyan journalists are quite good (especially compared with the US pack of dogs these days, who don't even know English anymore), but the ethical standard of the profession is low or even very low. And with this, I do not merely mean the extortionists (I read that KACC is presently prosecuting two of them) nor the open bribe-takers. But while young journalists still seem to remember their ethics courses well, and somehow strive to live up to these expectations, the senior scribes and especially the editors mostly care little.

One very good example is the infamous Clay Muganda plagiarism affair, where it needed a real Internet campaign and the personal forceful intervention of none less than Charles Onyango-Obbo with all his weight to discipline Clay, force him by sjambok strikes into a very reluctant apology, and to kick a number of complacent editors (females and males alike) in the butt, who previously has attempted to defend such open plagiarism.

So much for even most basic journalistic standards in the Nation. Feh !

Alexander
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Irrepentant wrongdoer...
written by aeichener , February 18, 2007
Yes, Mutuma Mathiu - can you believe that the guy is at it again? In his latest Sunday Nation column, he laments about Kenyans' sexual hypocrisy:
http://www.nationmedia.com/dai...wsid=92009

Now that would be all right and fine and peachy; if he only saw the log in his own eye.
For it is him and his paper that are the FOREMOST culprits of such hypocrisy.

Another case of the pot-shard calling the gourd broken. Just disgusting.

Alexander
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Write comment

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 01 October 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >


Login/Register

Login/ Register

click to subscribe
feed image

Contact

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it for content related questions and suggestions

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it for republication enquiries

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it to report faults or offensive comment.


Archives | About Us | KenyaImagine How To | Privacy Policy | ContactUs | Join KenyaImagine |  Advertise Here| Legal Disclaimer | Terms & Conditions | Directory
rss-2.png

 

Copyright 2009 KenyaImagine.com, the KenyaImagine logo and KenyaImagine.com are trademarks of  The Imagine Company