Is the failure in Kenya- now that we have been proved not so special- and in Africa, really a failure of leadership or this there other, perhaps justified, extenuation?
Musing through recent events, the apparent suspension of the ongoing mediation most of all, some questions are impelled on one's consciousness. Is there something (beer voucher to Ken Opalo for setting off this train of thought) to Chinua Achebe's thesis that the poverty of our leadership is the main obstacle to African progress?
The trouble with Africa is simply and squarely a failure of leadership. There is nothing basically wrong with the African character. There is nothing wrong with the African land or climate or water or air or anything else. The African problem is the unwillingness or inability of its leaders to rise to the responsibility, to the challenge of personal example which are the hallmarks of true leadership.
But if it is true that African leaders have been peculiarly bad, doesn't that presuppose that there is such a thing as Africa (yes, the cap is in order), and therefore a distinct African politics (rather: predicament). Our own Stephen Wanyama is convinced that there is, really and truly, no such thing as Africa, or African food, or African culture (whisper it quietly, but he's not even - heresy of heresies - rooting for Senator Barrack Obama). And if African leaders have been, and remain, the stumbling block, why is that? It can't, surely, be that there has been some outbreak of motiveless malice afflicting all and only African leaders, can it?
So, perhaps what we'd like to ask is this: Do you think Achebe is right, and if you do, why? And is Wanyama right - is there really an Africa? Consider this an open thread.
|
Thank you for the pointer, it has now been fixed. Eds