Home
An analysis of the violence PDF Print E-mail
Written by Daniel K Rubia   
Tuesday, 08 January 2008

While some of us grieve lost ones, and while thousands of Kenyans grapple with the reality of losing all their earthly possessions, it's time to reflect on how the violence escalated to these, previously unimaginable levels. 

In my view the violenc and its drivers can be divided into several categories.

The spontaneous expression of outrage at the perceived flawed election

This was what was witnessed in Kibera and Kisumu. Traditionally, this rather loud and exuberant expression of either political opinion or disappointment has historically had few if any cases of violence meted out on individuals. The disappointment was expected especially considering that this was a close election. Exit polls conducted by independent parties showed that Kibaki had won by 47% of the vote to Raila Odinga's 42%, but pre-election polling had for a long time prepped the ODM for a victory. The expectation was that as reality and sanity set in, these expressions of exultant exuberance would have peacefully dissipated.

This has provided the hallmark of how Kenya has achieved political progress and change by civil means. This non-violent expression of political opinion is encouraged.  The transition to multi-partysm led by most famously Kenneth Matiba and Charles Rubia is based on just this.

The dousing of the spontaneous expression by inflammatory statement. 

I do not recall any calls for calm by the so-called people's president when his supposedly aggrieved supporters had the upper hand in the violence that raged. Matter of fact, all I heard was him calling Kenya's legal president a thief. There were further calls for "mass action".

In an already volatile situation, the call for mass action in a situation that is already spiraling out of control is tantamount to inciting the perpetrators of the violence.  In repeated press briefings, there were claims by ODM that they had won most of the provinces. The reality is that President Kibaki won 4 of the 8 provinces and was not the president of one tribe as the ODM has sought to promote. Half of the provinces is not most. This was a convenient oversight that was continuously relayed to the Kenyan people. The Kenyan and international media has not made a protracted effort to rectify this false perception. The continuous and false claims that ODM had won most of the provinces did little to assuage their peeved  supporters.  When the country needed leadership, neither Ruto from Eldoret nor Raila from Kibera appealed to their constituents to maintain the peace. It is really most preposterous to ask that President Kibaki make this effort, quite clearly his presence in these areas would only be inflammatory.

The planned and well coordinated attacks in the Rift Valley

This international media has characterized the violence in the Rift Valley as ethnic violence. There is the implication that neighbor is rising against neighbor. This is not the truth. The truth is that there are organized criminal gangs that are unleashing this violence. These criminal gangs are not even native to the areas when they are unleashing the violence. The reality is that gangs of people do not assemble on a single night and cause mayhem over an entire region as a sporadic act of expressing anger and outrage. There is more to this violence than meets the eye, and it needs to be thoroughly explored. Even Bishop Cornelius Korir agrees. 

"Bishop Cornelius Korir spoke in western Eldoret, scene of the fiery massacre of Kikuyu. Eldoret and surrounding areas have seen an exodus of Kikuyus since. The violence across the country has killed some 500 people.

"The way the attacks were managed seems to me very organized," Korir said as the U.S. envoy, Jendayi Frazer, toured the region Tuesday. "No, it did not seem spontaneous to me ... It seems it was well planned." 

Over a quarter of a million people have been displaced - each has a story of property razed, or a personal testimony of a threat of violence, there have been numerous witnesses that have claimed that the violence was promised even before the elections (so much for spontaneity!). Pause and comprehend that number, - 250,000 displaced! Not over a month, but in two or three days. The MO of the perpetrators of this mayhem, ranging from Kuresio, to Ngenia Farm in Molo, to Eldoret was the same. Burn! Loot! Maim!

Even then we must not overlook those who have risen above the hatred. Most of the residents have stories of their neighbors (some of them from the supposedly terrorizing tribe) helping them to hide or providing assistance in one form or the other.

But who then are the perpetrators of this violence? Where does their hatred, over and above the normal arise from? Why such ruthless efficiency? Where do they get the resources to travel in such large groups and cover such long distances? Who are this people? Who is sponsoring them? How come they are only to be found in ODM strongholds? Why have the ODM leaders not strongly condemned these acts of violence? Or prevailed upon their supporters with sincerity to stop the violence? 

These are not freedom crusaders; they are local terrorists. Calling this low life criminal gangs anything but that is an insult to our freedom fighters, an insult to all those that have fought for democracy, an insult to the heroes who spear-headed the crusade for multi-partysm. The violence in the Rift Valley was not about an election loss. It was about majimbo - enforcing a political system by hook or crook, demanding zones of ethnic exclusivity much in the same way as the ethnic cleansing of the 1990s did. The violence would have broken out irrespective of the outcome of the elections  

I also believe the final death count from the Rift valley will be higher than the official death count as it stands today - as evidenced here. From various media sources, the victims of the violence say that there are still bodies not yet collected and are out there - in the razed wheat fields, in the rolling lush green tea bushes in Kericho, in the burnt houses in Burnt Forest and in small outposts where killing a family of Kikuyus is not exactly going to make the news.

To serve and protect

The claim that there are multiple deaths by bullet wounds does not implicate the police only. As has been clearly documented in the one case where some refugees were attacked in a police station, these criminal gangs have guns. Not every bullet-riddled body is a result of police bullets. We should not blame the police for serving and protecting. That they killed marauding armed criminals who had shown a propensity to kill is called serving and protecting.

The retaliation by Mungiki of attacks on their kin. 

This criminal outfit took this as the perfect opportunity to re-group. And they contributed to the problem by raising the tribal tensions and causing wanton death and destruction while directing their wrath on the wrong culprits. The expected reprisal killings from Mungiki are an attempt to make this criminal sect relevant. Mungiki must be made to step aside - let justice prevail so that the ensuing criminal prosecution does not get muddied and side tracked. 

The real culprits are still roaming free in the killing fields of Kuresoi, Burnt Forest, Ngenia Farm, Eldoret, Kericho and more areas in the North Rift. These criminal gangs that barricaded roads and pulled Kikuyus from matatus exiting the North Rift should be pursued, prosecuted and tried for pre-meditated killings. 

The accidental deaths of innocent people caught in the melee by the police are, in America speak, collateral damage.  Their deaths are truly unfortunate, as they were truly innocent victims  caught in the line of police fire. Some were maybe genuine demonstrators, some were looters who in a situation that was quickly deteriorating, were met with the full force of the law.

It would be wrong as some commentators are doing, to labell all the violence, post-election violence, or tribal clashes. All across the country, it has shwon itself to be very varied in both its inspiration and its execution. 


Daniel K Rubia
About the author:




Digg!Del.icio.us!Google!Facebook!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Trackback(0)
Comments (30)add
0
re:
written by manta ray , January 09, 2008
How about the planned and well ochestrated rigging to bring back an unpopular president who was sworn in like the thief he is?


What is your point? How on earth do you expect anybody to listen to your grievances when you can be so callous? Does losing an election justify murder? Does it? You can moan and groan about the election results till the cows come home but i assure you, if it is found out Ruto & co, ODM luminary, icon, saint and thug in chief, organised and orchestrated the murderous ethnic cleansing, they will certainly go to jail for very long prison terms, i.e if they escape the hangman's noose first. This kind of impunity has beeen going on since 1992 but this time, trust me, they have overplayed their hand and they will pay.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by a guest , January 09, 2008
How about the planned and well-orchestrated rigging to bring back an unpopular president who was sworn in like the thief he is? Rumours (which have turned round to be the truth) were doing rounds about Kibaki's current cabinet before the election results were even announced? After yesterday, I now believe that those rumours doing the rounds were not only rumours but the truth.
First I received an SMS warning me that Kibaki would be announced winner and all means of communication(TV, Radio and even Mobitels) will be seized by the government. That Kalonzo will be named VP.........True to his word this happened.
Then I received another one informing me that half the commissioners had refused to sign Kibaki's win and that Kivuitu was contemplating resigning.......This was confirmed by Kivuitu himself and some of the commissioners.

A third one informing me that Kibaki was being sworn in before even the elections results were even announced and that the footage will be shown on KBC only.True we were only shown a taped version on KBC.

After the elections, General Kianga supposedly d resigned because he did not like the way Kenyans were being treated the GSU as if they had committed a heinous crime........Although this has not been confirmed, I now have every reason to believe that he really resigned and that he must have been forced to stay on.
How I wish that Mungiki, Cattle Rustlers and the infighting in Mt. Kenya were met with the same force that we Kenyans were met with after peacefully going to the polls.
Rubia you as much as I and everyone else knows that Kibaki did not win the 2007 elections. He has the army, the police and all against us, but we will fight for democracy and God is on our side. It might not be today or tomorrow, but we will eventually triumph.

[Edited for sense and grammar]
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
*YAWN*
written by Q , January 09, 2008
Rubia, your so-called analysis is a one sided collection of "data" that you have accumulated from hearsay!
Take a moment; levitate and look at this from all angles; fairly; then write an analysis as a KENYAN!

You say;
...The transition to multi-partysm led by most famously Kenneth Matiba and Charles Rubia is based on just this....

Are you serious? if you think the fight for our freedom began with multi-partyism then you are slapping all those who came before Matiba and Rubia in the face AND also those who stood with Matiba and Rubia!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
causes of anarchy
written by Abdul Mote , January 09, 2008
I am pleased that you have taken the initiative of paying attention to some of the underlying reasons, which could have had a role to play to fuel the recent anarchy as we know of. But admittedly, such a task is not without its dangers, which inevitably and persistently linger about and confronts anyone who attempts to engage in the mechanics of interpreting the calamity unfolded. The topic calls for a deep analyses and as can be perceived and argued by many, so as it may complete our understanding and simultaneously begin the process of formulating appropriate remedies for the same. The following is my ‘pesa nane’.

“This has provided the hallmark of how Kenya has achieved political progress and change by civil means. This nonviolent expression of political opinion is encouraged. The transition to multipartyism led by most famously Kenneth Matiba and Charles Rubia is based on just this.”

You remark above smacks of obvious contradiction or should I say denial of reality? I don’t recall the pressure for change as fronted by Matiba and Rubia in the late eightess or early ninetees to be that “civil”. Probably you forget that there are many who paid an ultimate price for the cause. Indeed Matiba and Rubia paid in their own way towards the same. We cannot so soon forget the tyrannical rule we went through in Moi’s days.

But Kibaki was under a lot of pressure to change all that. His initial victory in 2002 had various factors which he could ignore even if he wanted to. His mandate was thus clearly spelt and he had to give in to some of the demands the wananchi had, although this is not to say that he was a naturally ‘genuine democrat’ and there are plenty of examples to show for that!

“The dousing of the spontaneous expression by inflammatory statement: I do not recall any calls for calm by the so-called people's president when his supposedly aggrieved supporters had the upper hand in the violence that raged. Matter of fact, all I heard was him calling Kenya's legal president a thief. There were further calls for "mass action".”

It is difficult to be able to objectively and fully empathize with a person in a position such as Raila’s. The man has been through a lot to say the truth. Whilst many may also attribute his Karma due to his ‘unrelenting’ and ‘almost fanatical pursuit’ of the presidency, the block had also tried a lot in defense of democracy and the silent in his endeavor, whether incidentally or by actual design, this comment cannot explore the facts behind the same.
I try not to be ‘partisan’ you see.
I such a situation he finds himself such as the case unfolding, what should you actually do? He has a situation which is perceived by himself as well as many others, correctly so or otherwise, as a ‘stolen and denied presidency’. He finds himself also not with the advantage of armed forces and government fixtures and so the power behind the authority, which he could have used to fight for his status, democratically so or otherwise! In such a case, what should he do? What is the right thing for him to do?

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
ODM
written by Kalindi , January 09, 2008
Losing an election does not justify acts of murder on innocent Kenyans.

I beg sense for crucial reasons I detail below that would make it ever more plausible to shift the US and Allied Forces Command Center in Iraq to the East African Nation of Kenya.

1. Raila has an agenda he does not comprehend. Full of repercussions and out to satiate an unquenchable thirst for power. Muslim appeasement will make the Nation of Kenya lose its soul.

2. Regionalism achieved through Political Opportunism and Buyouts will eventually lead to a Rwanda style genocide in Kenya.

3. Re-distribution of land and properties with deal a death blow to Kenya
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Police force has fallen short
written by benadede , January 09, 2008
I like General Ali very much. He speaks sensibly and eloquently, better than Alfred Mutua, most Kenyan politicians and outshone the ECK commissioners during election results briefings.

However, I think that his position and that of Mutua that the police had things under control is far from true. It is time to admit that either the police force falls short in numbers, training, equipment or (and this is more likely) a combination of the three.

While the Nairobi CBD was well protected, Kisumu CBD was totally wrecked. I want to believe that the police force were caught off guard by riots initially, but subsequent destruction of property in the CBD and residential houses is inexcusable if you claim that you had things under control.

In the Rift Valley, it has been worse. Armed gangsters took over whole highways, burnt property, killed and maimed with impunity.

Let the police and Kenyan taxpayers not bury their heads in the sand. If Mutua and Ali says that everything is under control, why do we have 1/4 million displaced persons mostly in the Rift Valley but also in Kisumu, Nairobi and several other towns. Don't we all deserve protection of our property and our lives by the government?

Am I surprised that the police has not contained the situation? Not at all. For many months we have watched as they hopelessly failed to deal with the situation in Mt. Elgon and later Kuresoi. Like now, the government gives vague statements on how they have intelligence that certain politicians whom they never name and never arrest are the ones behind the clashes. Always the claim is that they had prior intelligence yet they fail to prevent the disaster.

Who is this animal called "a local politician" who is afforded the comfort of freedom when he is denying Kenyans the right to life and property. When the heat is on, hundreds of youths get arbitrarily arrested but most are eventually released due to lack of evidence.

In the name of "peace" masterminds of clashes from 1992 to date have not been prosecuted. They have gone on to serve both in government and in the opposition. We are reaping what we sowed. At the moment, we are again waiting for tempratures to cool and then leave no stone unturned for justice - the only problem is that the police and the judiciary seem never to have enough muscle to turn over a pebble.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by a guest , January 10, 2008
If Kibaki really loves 'his people,' then let him share his land with these wretched but innocent Kikuyus who were rendered landless because of his insatiable greed for power.

As for violence, Kikuyus are committing as many atrocities as are being committed against them. There are no good guys here, folks.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re: Wrongly directed violence
written by aeichener , January 10, 2008
If Kibaki really loves 'his people,' then let him share his land with these wretched but innocent Kikuyus who were rendered landless because of his insatiable greed for power.


Kibaki has enjoyed power for a long time; he is not "greeding" for more, unlike Raila, whose lifelong ambition to become president has now been frustrated. Yes, Kibaki has enriched himself and his family/ies very badly - look at how big a landowner his family is now -, but that is not comparable with the unbridled reckless ambition of his challenger.

As for violence, Kikuyus are committing as many atrocities as are being committed against them. There are no good guys here, folks.


I agree that violence can be found in every ethnic group. Even Ogiek have occasionally fought back. However, the weights are quite unevenly distributed here. Retaliatory violence - as has been flaring up now and there - can never be justified, as long as it only hits equally poor and wretched people, and not the real political culprits. I have not yet seen any mob baying the bloods of Ntimama, Ruto, Saitoti. And Henry Kosgey could safely depart form his visit to the people whose land he had stolen. :-(

Alexander
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by a guest , January 10, 2008
You are light. The 'gleat reader' Kibaki is not only "greeding" for more, He wants the whole nine yards. That was easy.

Michuki is reconstituting the Mungiki, as the good man Kiai just intimated. Now I hear that the magnanimous and exceedingly charitable troika of Kibaki, Kenyatta, and Michuki have had a word with his eminence John cardinal Njue, have repented, and are now on the verge of parceling out their land to these wretched innocent victims of the clashes in Eldoret.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
I stand corrected
written by Rubia , January 10, 2008
Abdul -
My aim is not ethnic bias. The intent is to differentiate between genuine expression of a political opinion and planned violence. It just so happens with the areas I presented as EXAMPLES, you see ethnicity. I did not say that the spontaneous reaction was just confined to these 2 areas.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Kibaki is playing poker
written by Wuod Aketch , January 10, 2008
Kibaki got the real feeling and situation of his people blocked in Eldoret Airport. Somebody was not giving him the correct feed back.
What I found in one of the articles merits reflexion:

Previously regarded as a gentlemanly leader with a passion for golf, Kibaki has shown a steely side to Odinga, a former political prisoner and wealthy business owner who helped Kibaki win a 2002 poll but was sacked from government in 2005.

Even as he welcomed Kufuor on Tuesday evening, Kibaki named half his new cabinet in a pre-recorded TV announcement, trimming prospects for any power-sharing deal and igniting further ethnic violence in pro-Odinga towns and slums in the capital Nairobi.

American envoy Frazer spoke to Kibaki about the move, a U.S. State Department spokesman said.

"The perception was he was trying to put in place a political fait accompli," the spokesman said. "We expressed our displeasure, we were quite disappointed."

Kibaki told Frazer the step was intended only to keep the government running while there was a negotiated political settlement to the crisis, the spokesman said.



Has Kibaki become more reasonable all of a sudden? Give peace a chance.

Here is the link to the whole article

"Mediators press Kenyan leaders to end bloody dispute":
http://africa.reuters.com/coun...87688.html
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Selfish leaders
written by abdulmote , January 10, 2008
Whilst I do feel for Raila in being put in such a situation by Kibaki and his cohorts, I find no justification whatsoever in response towards the anarchy that followed the elections results. I also disagree with Rubia’s observation that part of that anarchy realised was just a spontaneous reaction which began in Kibera and Kisumu.

First things first; the so called spontaneous reaction was not simply confined to these two areas. I can see the author’s bias here clearly trying to show the ethnic confinement such a reaction had, but that is not necessarily true. No body can deny the fact that the whole nation and indeed the whole country had been very tense as it awaited the final results of the closely contested presidential votes from the ECK. The ECK on the other hand did not do the nation a favour by taking too long to come up with those results. The situation was certainly made worse when the electorate were made to believe that the final results are heavily rigged in favour of Kibaki anyway. This despite the initial counting as well as halfway through showing Raila had significant lead by the media’s tallying which were announced well before the ECK’s. In such a case, the shock and disbelief could not have been confined to those two areas only. The whole nation if I may say was stunned by the unfolding events then.

Let me now jump to Raila; I was seriously disgusted by his reaction in picking up a slogan created during the riots of ‘no justice no peace’, as one of his ways of maintaining pressure upon Kibaki. Of course I do understand his need of exacting pressure on the same one way or another, but such a choice to me was grossly misplaced. It follows that I could not help to ask myself ‘whose peace does Raila mean to destroy or upset if there is no justice’?

In answer to that question, it was obvious that nation was growing towards the state of anarchy. Different parts of the violence erupting then and being meted out on its victims bore different causes and motives of its continuation. Different geographical locations and composition of its residents as well contributed towards the eventual formation of those riots. But significantly in all these, not a single one could be said to have perhaps been targeted to the perceived and actual ‘fraudster’ or his allies, who denied him the presidency he was so convinced to have won. On the other hand, the violence erupting then or the peace being actually destroyed was the peace of purely innocent and ordinary citizens forming part of the electorate of Kenya. Indeed I dare say, some of those victims whose peace were being destroyed could have been the very ones who actually voted for Raila and may be ODM as well, despite their ethnic background which lead to their attack in the first place. How sad?

And so the slogan of no justice no peace was sickening to have been picked up by Raila and his supporters, some of which I had so much respect for. It appears that their misplaced campaign or retaliation to the election outcome lost its objectivity and clarity of thought when they decided to pick such a slogan with total disregard to the unfolding anarchy, and as a result, knowingly or otherwise, helped to fuel the ethnic violence which could not have benefited their cause in any way of form.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Who is losing in this arm twis
written by Wuod Aketch , January 10, 2008
Kibaki's business friends are losing millions everyday.
The pressure is not on the side where you think it is. 150,000 Kikuyus who once lived comfortably are now living on handouts and many have fled to the neighboring countries.
So those who think that Kibaki is having the upper hand, have their fingers in their noses. The status-quo is bad for state house and those hovering around it (those who stole the elections).
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re: Who is losing in this arm
written by Amina , January 10, 2008
Kibaki's business friends are losing millions everyday.
The pressure is not on the side where you think it is. 150,000 Kikuyus who once lived comfortably are now living on handouts and many have fled to the neighboring countries.
So those who think that Kibaki is having the upper hand, have their fingers in their noses. The status-quo is bad for state house and those hovering around it (those who stole the elections).


Sir, this is where you miss the point. Kibaki is NOT "the Kikuyu", I mean he is one, but his interests have never been that of the Kikuyu, only of his political elite.
And the same for Raila. What would you say about the Kisumu residents who turned up to work only to find everything burned down? Many of their employees have either left town or lost all their business. Self employed Kisumu residents were in for a rude shock when they went to their stalls in Kondele market.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re: re: Wrongly directed viole
written by Amina , January 10, 2008
Kibaki has enjoyed power for a long time; he is not "greeding" for more, unlike Raila, whose lifelong ambition to become president has now been frustrated. Yes, Kibaki has enriched himself and his family/ies very badly - look at how big a landowner his family is now -, but that is not comparable with the unbridled reckless ambition of his challenger.


Huffpo explores this: Why Voters Reelect Thugs
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re: re: Who is losing in this
written by Amina , January 10, 2008
I agree that it is sad that those Kisumu residents may nolonger be having jobs. Nevertheless they are not sleeping outside in the cold packed together under police protection. Neither do they live on a bowl of maize dished out to them daily by some Red cross or Red crescent.

Please do not try to defend a pathetic posture. Be realistic, the situation of the refugees is much worse especially for those who have fled to the neighboring countries. These people no longer know what freedom is.


Suit yourself, hate is very easy to preach and spread. You are out of touch with reality.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re: Who is losing in this arm
written by Wuod Aketch , January 11, 2008

And the same for Raila. What would you say about the Kisumu residents who turned up to work only to find everything burned down? Many of their employees have either left town or lost all their business. Self employed Kisumu residents were in for a rude shock when they went to their stalls in Kondele market.

I agree that it is sad that those Kisumu residents may no longer be having jobs. Nevertheless they are not sleeping outside in the cold packed together under police protection. Neither do they live on a bowl of maize dished out to them daily by some Red cross or Red crescent.

Please do not try to defend a pathetic posture. Be realistic, the situation of the refugees is much worse especially for those who have fled to the neighboring countries. These people no longer know what freedom is.

(Mere propaganda phrases edited. Ed)
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re: re: re: Who is losing in t
written by Wuod Aketch , January 11, 2008
I agree that it is sad that those Kisumu residents may nolonger be having jobs. Nevertheless they are not sleeping outside in the cold packed together under police protection. Neither do they live on a bowl of maize dished out to them daily by some Red cross or Red crescent.

Please do not try to defend a pathetic posture. Be realistic, the situation of the refugees is much worse especially for those who have fled to the neighboring countries. These people no longer know what freedom is.


Suit yourself, hate is very easy to preach and spread. You are out of touch with reality.


Just giving you facts and not preaching hatred:

Bonyeza below:

Clash over food as victims starve http://www.eastandard.net/news/?id=1143980247
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Tavia Nyong\'o , January 11, 2008
Under the guise of analyzing the violence, several pieces of pro-government disinformation appear in this analysis. There was only one exit poll, by Institute for Education in Democracy, that showed Kibaki in the lead, and not even the government claims he won by the margin they reported. The institute now publishes on its website, and presumable endorses, the KEDOF report confirming the tally "lost credibility."

Not sure how you construe a Kibaki win in one province as a win in four, but a graphic published on an official government website clearly shows ODM winning handily in 4, and a dead heat in 2.

http://www.communication.go.ke/elections/province.asp
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by aeichener , January 11, 2008
It is certainly necessary to call into memory the irregularities on both sides, and the violence that already had preceded the release of results on December 30th, and which made them absolutely pressing.

As to the World Bank Memo, I shall just quote from the Standard:

* * *

The World Bank memo claims that investigation had revealed more poll fraud on the side of ODM than PNU. The memo claims, "The considered view of the UN is that ECK announcement of a Kibaki win is correct".

Bruce's memo says data available indicated the highest reported turnout in a Kibaki stronghold was 90 per cent, but in Raila's strongholds, there were six heavily populated areas with reported turnout of between 102 to 116 per cent.

The memo acknowledged that the EU draft report cited two constituencies in which Kibaki's margin was inflated, but adds the same does not say whether that invalidated the overall results.

It concludes that the reader is left to determine that the inflation could not have been higher than 48,000 votes against the ECK-declared margin of victory of 230,000.

The memo blames the widely held view that the Government rigged the poll on a "highly media-savvy opposition".
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
The link to the article
written by Wuod Aketch , January 11, 2008
Kivuitu disowns poll results :


Link here
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Kenya cannot work with certain
written by dr.phil , January 11, 2008
Edited.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by a guest , January 11, 2008
Aeichener, your analysis is very right. You are absolutely correct to put it bluntly. Collins Bruce's "Memo" is also very "authentic."

And Kenya is the bastion of peace and stability in East Africa- who dare think otherwise! You jealous Ugandans, Tanzanians, Somalis, Sudanese, etc.

Kenya has peace; don't you know that.

Edited. will delete next time.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Stick to issues!
written by abdulmote , January 11, 2008
bwana anonymous

Whoever you are, personal attacks do not help us to understand at any depth how deeply informed you may be.

Just stick to issues and offer your side of the story that others may know as well.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Kibaki\'s 4 provinces
written by Miharati , January 11, 2008
Nyong'o. I checked the website with the RESULTS and it shows Kibaki WON 4 provinces and Raila won 4 provinces.
Let me name the provinces that Kibaki won: Nairobi, Central, Eastern and North Eastern. Please do not misrepresent the truth.

An exit poll is also is just that, a poll. More accurate than an opinion poll but not a 100% indicator of voting. The poll was conducted (FACT) and the numbers presented are per the exit poll (FACT). Where is the misinformation?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Kivuitu said that:
written by Wuod Aketch , January 11, 2008
He does not know whether Kibaki won the presidential elections and he was the chairman of the ECK at that time.
So this small talk about Bruce's memo and the UN is a waste of time or to be polite, just rubbish. Unless you want to drown the fish!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by a guest , January 12, 2008
Ad hominem attacks deleted - Ed

In the recently concluded discussions, Colin Bruce of the Bank recommended a transitional government (to be headed by a neutral person acceptable by both the PNU and ODM) and an investigation into the election results. Guess who refused to accept this deal? Your tribal mate dictator Kibaki.

Your shallow mind has probably never heard of a varnished tale. While you are at liberty to support your "great reader" Kibaki as one might expect of any card carrying member of GEMA, however, thou shalt not lie.

P.S. Is it only GEMA people who believe that Kibaki 'won' the "erection."
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
The victims of odm violence cr
written by Cogni , January 14, 2008
Wuod Aketch even as he gloats and preens over the plight of displaced Kikuyus is right in that they are suffering and in a pathetic state.

(Where he did so, we have invariably deleted or edited it. We wish to point out that we do not tolerate such posting behaviour as described by you; what still remains, is borderline. Eds.)

The suffering of victims of odm ethnic cleansing whether they be kikuyu, Kisii, embu, meru kuria or kambas in kisumu, coast, eldoret and the Rift valley are crying out for justice. The blood of those who have been hacked or burnt to death by the marauding groups of odm killers also cries out for justice.

This odm violence and ethnic cleansing is a form of election rigging. Fair elections cannot be held until this victims have been resettled back in their homes and until they feel safe to freely vote their conscience without fear of attack by Raila's thugs.

More pressing is the question of resettlement of refugees. The government should undertake this exercise as swiftly as possible. The perpetrators of the violence from the panga wielder to th political inciters and mastermind should be swiftly brought to book.

The victims of this planned odm genocide should also sue the perpetrators. Raila is a billionaire and given his culpability the victims should sue Raila in Kenyan courts as well as american courts. In the US victims of thenic cleansing can sue the perpetrators even when the crimes do not take place on us soil or involve us citizens.

Only by hitting the politicians who organized this killings where it hurts most (the wallet) can we end the impunity with which this political masterminds of ethnic cleansing have acted since 1992.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re: The victims of odm violenc
written by Wuod Aketch , January 14, 2008
Wuod Aketch even as he gloats and preens over the plight of displaced Kikuyus is right in that they are suffering and in a pathetic state.

(Where he did so, we have invariably deleted or edited it, Michuki style. We wish to point out that we do not tolerate such posting behaviour as described by you; what still remains, is borderline. Eds.)

The suffering of victims of odm ethnic cleansing whether they be kikuyu, Kisii, embu, meru kuria or kambas in kisumu, coast, eldoret and the Rift valley are crying out for justice. The blood of those who have been hacked or burnt to death by the marauding groups of odm killers also cries out for justice.

This odm violence and ethnic cleansing is a form of election rigging. Fair elections cannot be held until this victims have been resettled back in their homes and until they feel safe to freely vote their conscience without fear of attack by Raila's thugs.

The victims of this planned odm genocide should also sue the perpetrators. Raila is a billionaire and given his culpability the victims should sue Raila in Kenyan courts as well as american courts. In the US victims of thenic cleansing can sue the perpetrators even when the crimes do not take place on us soil or involve us citizens.

Only by hitting the politicians who organized this killings where it hurts most (the wallet) can we end the impunity with which this political masterminds of ethnic cleansing have acted since 1992.


When one talks about known and documented violence, one cannot help accusing the men and women holed upto to date in state house. Can you talk about Kibaki violence on the innocent men, women and children in Kisumu? We are sure that they, Kibaki, Michuki, Karua ordered these murders. The police and paramilitary (GSU) always act on orders. There is somewhere a signed document - unless this one has been mad to evaporate too.

I, like many others, do not think that any politician ordered the violence in the Rift valley it was spontaneous.

Foreign correspondents, who transmitted the violence in Nairobi

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Wuod Aketch , January 14, 2008
Here is the link :
Kenyans are fighting inequality, not ethnicity
http://www.nationmedia.com/dai...sid=114546

I do not have the courage to rewrite what was following.

Problem with the text editor. Should do something about it Mr Editor.

(Yes, we mentioned it in an earlier comment of ours. Annoying for our participants, and we wish to apologize to them. The problem is keyboard specific (!). Some keyboards apparently are not generating the correct apostroph character, namely the following: ''''''', but rather a slanted accent. Nevertheless, the Joomla software ought to accept both. Sorry, we are on it! Ed.)
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Write comment

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 09 January 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >


Archives | About Us | KenyaImagine How To | Privacy Policy | ContactUs | Join KenyaImagine |  Advertise Here| Legal Disclaimer | Terms & Conditions | Directory
rss-2.png

 

Copyright 2009 KenyaImagine.com, the KenyaImagine logo and KenyaImagine.com are trademarks of  The Imagine Company