Gaza's long period of insecurity and violence abruptly ended after Hamas took
over control in May in a shoot-out with Fatah, the party of Palestinian
Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.
Fatah was roundly defeated
in last year's elections, but wished, with full Israeli and Western collusion, to continue ruling on its own terms, refusing to hand over control over the Authority's security apparatus.The US and Israeli antidote
to this stability in Gaza, as in Somalia six months ago when the
Islamic Courts were in control, is to crush and comprehensively
disenfranchise Hamas, despite its overwhelming public support in
Palestine. The party's comprehensive marginalisation is part of the
prelude to another great injustice that is being planned against the
Palestinian people in full view of the world.
What President George Bush,
new Middle Eastern envoy representing the Quartet- Tony Blair, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Fatah head Mahmoud Abbas -
all spectacularly failed leaders in their own countries - are working
towards, will ensure the Palestinian State that the world has agreed to
will never see the light of day.
The plan instead is
what many have long feared: "a string of Palestinian islands similar to
the Bantustans set up by the white regime in South Africa," wrote Uri
Avneri, of the Israeli peace movement, Gush Shalom . He pointed to yet another
racist decree in January, which forbade Israeli drivers from giving
Palestinians a ride in the occupied territories. No wonder the recent
book by US President Jimmy Carter, who initiated the historic
Sadat-Begin breakthrough 30 years ago, was Peace, not Apartheid, encouraging a return to the works of bringing about a just peace in the Middle East rather than a continuation of the partitioning of the peoples of Palestine and Israel.
|
| honest broker? |
So into this scene
stepped Mr Blair this week, as the envoy of the Quartet - the US, EU,
Russia and the UN - on his first mission to the region. He had come primarily "to
listen and learn", he said. How little he must have learned is now
clear: he refused to meet with Hamas, the victors of Palestinian
elections last year. He met only those who Israel and the US wanted him
to.
As the BBC explained,
senior European and UN officials, unhappy with Mr Blair's exclusion of
Hamas, are staying silent because they don't wish to contradict Mr
Abbas' position. What cowards these diplomats are! When government officials
seek solutions in dependent countries, they always speak to the
opposition. Can we imagine Ambassador Smith Hempstone not meeting
multiparty advocates in the 1990s because President Moi did not wish
him to? And Hamas are not even the opposition; they are the elected
government. The hypocrisy is breathtaking.
But the game now is for the
US to use force to put in place regimes that have little national
support but that can be relied on to do its bidding. However, issues of principle and
justice aside, the main problem with this approach is that it is not
working, and is causing human suffering on a scale that will continue
to create global insecurity, as is already shown by Iraq, Afghanistan,
Lebanon and Somalia.
A Palestinian state created with the
connivance of a leader who uses infinitely stronger language to condemn
Hamas than Israeli occupiers, and whose party is riddled with massive
corruption and incompetence, will only foment further anger and terror, prolonging the impasse and benefiting none but those comfortable with the status quo.
 |
BBC map of illegal settlements
|
Part of the problem of course is the
demonisation of Hamas, which is repeatedly condemned by the Western
media as being committed to the violent destruction of the Israeli
State. That this is untrue is not particularly clear to everyone, given the extent of the media bias. The facts however speak different. In the 18 months before the
elections it won last year, Hamas observed a unilateral ceasefire
against Israel, despite the assassination of a number of its leaders. But this will not satisfy the implacable foes in Israel and the West who demand from Hamas its one tactical
strength - recognition of Israel - without offering it anything other
than negotiations. This is the mistake that Yasser Arafat made- before he saw the situation of the Palestinians plummet after the 1993 Oslo talks began.
The Western blockade on aid to an already impoverished Gaza since Hamas's victory is also inhumane
in the extreme, and reveals yet again the hollowness of their
protestations about protecting innocent civilians during conflict.
In the interest of global stability, the West needs to abandon its goal of seeking subservient regimes.
The only solution to the
wider Middle East's problems is engagement with forces which have
popular support. It's a tough task, but far preferable to the mayhem
unleashed by current policies.
|
It is about time that all the involved powers (Quartet) stopped paying lip-service to this Two State solution and actually got down to working out how to create a secure and contiguous state for the Palestinians with Jerusalem as its capital. The current situation is simply a ploy by these Western powers and Russia to get Israel to continue speak to a weak puppet authority and thereby maintain the status quo.
As events in the Lebanon last year showed Israel has become complacent about the capabilities of her enemies since the demise of Iraq. Hezbollah forces proved that they were equipped and prepared and were fighting for a just cause. Defence analysts in Israel have long said that it would be in Israel's own National interests to work with a strong popularly elected Government such as Hamas would be, to negotiate a just and lasting settlement in that region. Such a peace would hold.
I suspect, like Mr Lone, that a just and lasting settlement may be something that the UN and some European countries may aspire to but they are resigned to the fact that it may not happen in this life-time. Britain, France, US and Russia are major arms suppliers with many client states all over the Middle-East from Oil-rich Saudia to tiny desert states. If peace broke out in that region it would deal a significant blow to their arms industries with unimagineable consequences.
Perhaps even the coffin-maker says prayers to his god when business is bad.