purchase viagra onlinebuy CIALIS 20mg
Constricted political space and forced allies PDF Print E-mail
Written by Amir Ibrahim   
Thursday, 23 August 2007

It was not a big headline, but it may count for more than is obvious. Former Cabinet Minister and Marakwet MP Linah Jebii Kilimo has packed her bags, left the ODM 'bash' and returned to support the government. I am not going to speculate on the exact reasons for the departure of the Marakwet legislator, who was famous not just for her courage in advocating the rights of women in her area before she came to Nairobi, but also for her resolution when she chose to quit the government and serve ODM. But it is curious that she should return now, to the very people and group she had previously made speeches against, and from whose grip she had sought to redeem her people.

Analysts have predicted that the exodus from ODM and the government is likely to swell as the elections draw nearer, and as 'friends for flags' leave the government for the opposition. On the side opposed to the government, there will also be an emanation, especially as the post-election positions are apportioned and ambitions are let down.

 This would be natural anywhere, but perhaps more within our borders than anywhere else is there a fickleness in the formation and dissolution of alliances. In this world of desultory bonds,even after the onset of multi-partyism, there is little chance that team work and planning will lead anywhere as shifting sands demand new ties. The result is that vital economic and social progress is set aside as point scoring and immediate gratification prevail over the need to construct new and lasting structures. It could even be said, that Kenya's biggest political problem is the way a murky alliance of money and the hegemony of the big tribes rules our politics. There are several MPs today who have not a bone in their body that supports whatever alliance they are in, but who nonetheless find themselves shackled to political organisations in order to stay relevant.

This already bad situation is further exacerbated by the fact that our people are not educated voters, and that they hardly ever vote in a fashion that is beneficial to their good, Kenyan MPs of conscience are consistently forced to wet their fingers, raise them to the wind, and then turn and with their pacts signed and pocketed, take the wide road.

It is not just Jebii Kilimo who has been compelled to this Faustian compromise. A cursory glance through the ranks of our politicians shows up MPs like Paul Muite, Charity Ngilu, Raphael Tuju, Mukhisa Kituyi, Danson Mungatana, Kivutha Kibwana, James Orengo and even Anyang' Nyong'o and Kiraitu Murungi who have realised first hand that our people do not value independent thinkers, and that they do not ever support the underdog. Conscience is nothing, thirst is everything. To win in this battle, you must cheat, steal, bully and intimidate everyone you can see or feel threatening your position.

This sad state of affairs is perhaps best captured in the travails of Kalonzo Musyoka, also called Stephen. In his days as a chorister for the then ruling party he sought to keep his fingers unsullied by association with the national gravy pot. He kept so clean that his detractors have to go all the way back to the early 1990s to get any mud to stick on him, and even that feels silly compared to the colossal abuse of office that has made the other principals billionaires almost overnight. Even more important than this eschewal of the national culture of kunyakua, was his servility and obedience to the every whim of the Baba, the colossus that ruled Kenyan politics back then. As he grew older, and as the political climate changed, this Stephen was born-again; and in the afternoon of his life realized that he had a pair that were designed for use.

Subsequently, and for a few moments, the gentleman in him was rewarded with thunderous applause from the public gallery and even whispered as a possible future President. National polls proclaimed him the leader among those seeking occupancy of State House, far ahead of his fellow in ODM. And then it all went wrong.

What he forgot was that the way to State House more often than not is taken on all fours, and here he was brash and outspoken,not knowing his place, not playing the game.


 

Before he could open his eyes from his constant prayer, the media and his foes had been joined in an alliance against him. Unschooled in the vicious ways of the world, it took forever before he could clench a fist and fight back, and when he did he realised that in the arena of tribal kings and billionaires he packed a feeble punch.

Some will say that they never would support Kalonzo anyhow, that he was not a reformist or a revolutionary. Perhaps it is best then to finish with the ghost of the fearless James Orengo, whose name is burnished in every mind and who is lionized even by his most intransigent foes. This Orengo was in the media this week, giving an interview to weekly paper Leader . What was clear from the interview, for me, was that like many of us James Orengo is persuaded by the pro-Wanjiku stance that ODM in its variant forms seems to take. We are after all witnesses both to the perfidy of Kibaki with regard to the MoU of the last election, and also to the resounding beating meted out to the government by the movement at the Referendum in 2005. What comes out however, is that in spite of the obvious attraction to ODM, he is still wary of being too close to it, of defending it, even of drawing a difference between President Kibaki, Raila Odinga and Kalonzo Musyoka. The interview ends up feeling like a commentary from an uninvolved outsider.

This is an issue that has exercised my mind for many months. The solution is not in new political parties, there are many of those. Even as more of them are registered, the curiosities still stand. Why then are there so many Kenyans who are not ready to go the ODM way even though they support its proposed spirit and indeed were vociferous in their support for it in 2005? Why is it that many in ODM pay lip service to the movement and its leaders, even as they ride along in the all crushing juggernaut? Why are there many leaders and politicians who have pretensions to a pro-reform, pro-people agenda but who find themselves restricted within the confines of the NARC-K conservative ranks? What is Kiraitu Murungi doing in the NARC-K government, and why is Ngilu not yet in ODM?


Amir Ibrahim
About the author:




Digg!Del.icio.us!Google!Facebook!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Trackback(0)
Comments (9)add
0
platform?
written by Mr.Kay , August 23, 2007
As someone who is pro-Kibaki, I feel the problem with ODM was that as a movement it was mainly built on tribal sentiments, as opposed to more concrete policy issues. How long that was bound to last is still being played out.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
open up the space
written by Jaya wardene , August 23, 2007
The writer raises interesting view-points. Needless to say it is the nature of politics that different people see Hon Kilimo's actions differently and draw any number of conclusions as to her objectives.

Iam a bit suspicious of the argument that says we can only reform a system from within it. The erstwhile reformers you mention above all seem to have been ensnared by the intriquacies of the system and few if any will win back their own seats.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by ole mepukori , August 23, 2007
our country has an acute leadership problem, the institutional of leadership is tribalistic, and lacks focus and vision. Kalonzo was in government for 20 years, he would atleast have used his position to uplift the lifes of his constituents who still remain the poorest and least developed socially,and economically. it is timely for the kenyan people to start taking this people for who they really are. Raila has been in priviledged position all his life. He has put together a sizeable financial weapon for the campaigns from friends, my question is, where were his friends when the people of kibera lacked social amenities? The truth is Raila only visits Kibera when a high ranking offial from the world bank, the UN or any other donor agency visits Kibera.
for how long will kenyans be hoodwinked by politicians out for power, what does it take for kenyans to say enough is enough? for how long will our government use big terms to describe the generic problems facing our people and for how long will we wait fro the government to do everything for us?

it is 2007 or never, this should be a bottom up revolution, let the people decide.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Stephen Wanyama , August 23, 2007
Here is a link to a transcript of the mentioned Orengo interview.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Things fall apart
written by Stephen Wanyama , August 23, 2007
Ole Mepukori,
If you go back a little, you will find a week of discussions here where we tried to see what benefit if any there was for the universal suffrage we enjoy in Kenya.
It is hard to be convinced, but I think I agree now that it is not always a good thing that all these people are allowed to vote. Part of the problem is the fact that we have been socialised into accepting just this sort of leader. Did you see the link to an excerpt from Duncan Ndegwa's memoirs where Kenyatta was praised even as he stole public land for himself? Do we not cheer on as these thieves land in our villages in helicopters? Do we not cheer the Hummer?

We are sending very mixed signals to our politicians, on the one hand asking them to be austere and accountable to the public, and on the other demanding that they lord it over us, live like kings and wield big sticks against the national interest. There will be no revolution from the top up, the revolution's energy has been diverted by another pretender in Raila Odinga.

The lemmings will follow him to the precipice somewhere near Kibera, and then things will fall apart.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by joe , August 23, 2007
i think if we really need democracy we need to allow for independent candidates
hnce giving psace to indepndent thinkers and also ensuring that political parties do have relevance since they woud have to have a compeling platform to attract members and candidates to run on there platform
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by a guest , August 26, 2007
Kenyan MPs of conscience are consistently forced to wet their fingers, raise them to the wind, and then turn and with their pacts signed and pocketed, take the wide road.

It is not just Jebii Kilimo who has been compelled to this Faustian compromise.


In Jebii Lilimo's case this ould be plausible if she was in a pro Kibaki constituency. MaraKwet maybe many things but not a Kibaki bastion.

Mrs kilimo has therefore made a decision that may be detrimental to her reelection. Rather than bowing to the prevaling political winds Jebii Kilimo may actually be standing on principal.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Stephen Wanyama , August 26, 2007
Anonymous,
Your statement obviously pre-supposes that standing with Kibaki is a principled stand. I would say, just like the author makes out that anyone with a conscience on either side of the divide is likely to find himself standing in many things but principles are not them.

The desire to compromise is also visible in one charity Ngilu who it seems cannot make her mind up on which party represents the bigger demon, and which one would she have the better chances of walking back to the Cabinet with. Bendera huleta mazoea.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Stephen Wanyama , August 26, 2007
On Joe's previous comment. In addition to independent candidates, I believe we should allow for coalition governments in law. Not the ugly mogrels like ODM and NARC but real coalitions, so that even small parties can run national elections knowing full well what their principles and goals are, and so that for example the social democrats here on KenyaImagine can have a party they will not be ashamed to vote for.
After the election, as is done in civilised countries , the parties can then sit down and negotiate based on what the outcome was at the election, and what each party's position or goal in office is.
Along with proportional representation ( a departure from First Past the Post Politics), this will ensure that we have something more like a democracy, and less like a race to side with the winning team, whatever the cost.

In such a world as this for example, Europe's Green Parties, even when they have not won more than 10% of the vote have served to civilise European politics, bringing in greater representation for women and minorities, greater care for the environment and the third world, and a more balanced approach to global politics.

Please look up Joscha Fischer for example.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Write comment

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
Last Updated ( Thursday, 23 August 2007 )
 
< Prev   Next >


Archives | About Us | KenyaImagine How To | Privacy Policy | ContactUs | Join KenyaImagine |  Advertise Here| Legal Disclaimer | Terms & Conditions | Directory
rss-2.png

 

Copyright 2009 KenyaImagine.com, the KenyaImagine logo and KenyaImagine.com are trademarks of  The Imagine Company

Buy Cheap Software Corel Home Office 5.0 Multilingual Corel WordPerfect Office 2002 Professional Edition