Double standards, with your presenter, Raila Odinga PDF Print E-mail
Written by Victor Mwangu   
Sunday, 27 January 2008

One of the consequences of the gullibility of the Kenyan people, is that even the most widely available evidence, the most glaring contradictions and the grandest lies are overlooked, even ignored by what should properly be enlightened citizens.

So it is that Raila Odinga and the ODM, all of them bearing rich histories that are widely available, are now presented to us as champions of the common man, as democrats, wielders of the shield of defence of the greater good. His media associates and his propaganda body would wants us to believe that he, together with his rowdy band of supporters are such strict adherents to the ideals of democracy and justice that "they cannot sit and watch as the democratic gains they sacrificed so much for go down the drain.

It is not an office that I think superfluous, this Defender of Fundamental Freedoms and Democracy, but it would surely make more sense to put in it an occupant with a modicum of credibility and a hint of consistency. You cannot say one thing today and then the complete opposite tomorrow. In that exalted office, you have to make your views clear, what exactly is it you believe in.

Let us, for the sake of argument, assume that the election was rigged in favour of President Mwai Kibaki. Is getting idle hooligans into the streets and setting the country aflame the best way of contesting the election results? Why do we have courts in Kenya if we are never going to make use of them? When Raila Odinga says he does not have faith in Kenya's judicial system and yet 13 ODM parliamentary losers are contesting the results in their constituencies with the same courts, one is left wondering where this doublespeak will end. Why are they not mobilizing the goons in their constituencies since that is the new way of seeking justice? Why did Raila Odinga or Najib Balala not go to Kibera and Kisumu and call on the youth there to grab their simis, stones and lighters and go causing mayhem and burning everything at sight when they did not agree with Safaricom's proposed privatization? They went to court then did they not? They trusted the court with that right?

Let us be honest here. The 2007 election was not the first to be stolen in Kenya. The 1992 one was stolen from FORD-Asili's Kenneth Matiba and we did not see the impoverished, marginalised youth in Murang'a and Kiambu stoning motorists or burning churches. The election of 1997 was stolen from the DP's Mwai Kibaki and yet we did not see people in Nyeri and Meru burning government vehicles or slaughtering Kalenjins. Why is this stupidity happening now? What was so special with this last election or the aggrieved candidate? Don't look for answers to these questions elsewhere. The answer lies in the mind of the main protagonist in the unrest---Raila Amolo Odinga, the man who has flatly refused to live within the laws of mature responsibility and who believes that there are no laws governing the universe other than satisfaction of his demands.

At the very minimum,the ODM leader must understand that his demands will not be met as promptly and as effectively as he would expect, more than that however, violent means no matter how righteously justified have effects far beyond the mere political and are likely turning more and more of Kenya's people away from him. The ODM and its MPs must now force this truth on their leader, and redeem him from the unreal world whose laws are dominated by magical expectations that things will play out the way they do in movies. Would it be at all a victory were Kenya to be delivered to the ODM burned to the ground, an economic pariah at the mercy of the international community?

But Raila's hypocrisy ends not at his penchant for violent protest and blackmail, it extends into insults and name-calling.  Everyone that does not take up his myopic worldview, every soul that sees a different way than that he promotes is deemed perfidious, a traitor. This is why Kalonzo Musyoka's acceptance of the Vice Presidency has been so cruelly demonized. It is as though Kalonzo's political career path is determined by Raila's fancy. It is clear that Kalonzo's career was already startlingly successful even before Raila joined the arena of elective politics. The Vice President had, without any family patronage - unlike most of those who claim political astuteness, contested and won a Parliamentary seat (at the age of 32), become an assistant minister and even been voted by his peers the deputy speaker of the Kenya National Assembly. When he was appointed Foreign Affairs minister in 1993, Kalonzo was the country's chief diplomat at a time when the ODM leader Raila Odinga was only just setting foot in the August house.

Still, the most glaring evidence of the ODM leader's chicanery, and the gullibility of both the media and the enlightened class is represented in light of his reaction to rigged elections in the past. 

Returning to the  1992 elections, it is clear that those were rigged in favour of President Daniel arap Moi. The entire opposition was unanimous on that. Then Kiharu MP Kenneth Matiba, Othaya MP Mwai Kibaki and Bondo MP Jaramogi Oginga Odinga agreed that the elections were a sham. George Nthenge and Kimani Wanyoike petitioned the results with the high court.  Jaramogi Odinga (Chairman) and his son Raila Odinga (Deputy Director of elections)  and most other members of Ford Kenya even went ahead and refused to acknowledge the presence of the President during the swearing-in of Members of Parliament and election of the Speaker (much like Ababu Nyamwamba, Anyang' Nyong'o and Raila Odinga did this time around).

Bearing already the indecorous, ill-disciplined mien that persists to date, they remained glued to their seats even when far stronger candidates like Kibaki rose up in honour of the President. It was a valiant protest, right? No such luck, only one year down the line, FORD-Kenya was already in cooperation with KANU. Had it not been for people like Michael Wamalwa and Dr. Mukhisa Kituyi, and had the Jaramogi not died in the beginning of 1994, the party would have likely joined Moi's cabinet. They were reading from the same script with Moi and they will unashamedly tell you that that then was not betrayal, it was strategy. 

Fast forward five years. The initial reaction across the entire opposition after the announcement of the 1997 election results was that Moi had yet again rigged himself back to power. The twice beaten Mwai Kibaki was livid, so what did he do? He took Moi to court for rigging him out. That case was thrown out for ‘lack of evidence' in 2001 by which time Raila Odinga -who had shocked the public by abandoning the anti-rigging protest- was not only a cabinet minister, but had also dissolved his political party and joined KANU. Was that not "legitimizing" Moi's victory? Was that not a betrayal of Kibaki, Wamalwa, Ngilu and the entire opposition fraternity?

It reminds me of this story that is told of a Kenyan lady who went to Germany and didn't communicate back home for a couple years. When she finally comes home, her father started yelling at her; ‘You bastard, don't you know how much suffering you have caused your mother? Why did you not call and let us know how you were doing? We were worried sick! Now tell me what you have been up to.' The girl says; "I became a prostitute".

‘You became a what? I want you out of this house now. We can never put up with a slut in this house'. The girl says, "well, I was just bringing you the keys to the Jeep parked out there, the title deed of a nice little plot at the coast and Kshs 4 million for mother in the Barclays Bank in Westlands". The Mzee keeps quiet and then asks: ‘And what is it you said you became?' "A prostitute, father".

The old man says; ‘Oh, that's ok, I thought you said you became a protestant. My bad'--------Double standards is what I call it.

The mentality Raila and his supporters have that they have a divine right to the Presidency is misplaced. They are going to kill, maim and rape people and after all that, they will remain what they are - opposition members of parliament, repulsive to the majority Kenyans until such a time as they respect public institutions and graciously appreciate the presence of competing interests in the political game.

The violence clearly is not about a rigged election. No, it is about sour grapes and a pre-disposition to bullying, blackmail and battery.





Digg!Del.icio.us!Google!Facebook!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Trackback(0)
Comments (19)add
0
the MAYHEM; kibaki\'s role
written by LUI , January 28, 2008
(...)
BUT take another look. what is the role of Mr. Mwai Kibaki? Is there not something he can do to bring an end to all this? Can he behave like a true winner? in my view having a re-run would be much more less costly than the cost of re-building a war ravaged nation. and having a running mate this time round, may actually win convincingly.
(...)
alternatively, let us just have fresh elections with neither kibaki or raila running!!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
What is the way out?
written by Wuod Aketch , January 28, 2008
If we accept that Kibaki remains holed in state house from today upto 2012, what will this country become?
Are Kenyans ready to sacrifice the 4 years and 11 months that will be of Kibaki rule? But I do not see the displaced getting back to their homes in the Rift valley in such an eventuality. The actual situation needs a political resolution. I do not see the Kikuyus running their businesses outside central province neither i.e after the recent atrocities in Naivasha and Nakuru. That is why I use the word sacrifice. It will be sacrifing Kenya for 4 yrs and 11 months.

The Kenya of today and tomorrow needs all it's forces to be strong. No tribe should be left out. Kenya needs the athletic tribes from the RV, its
supposedly skilled business tribes from central, the fishermen and intellectuals from the lake, it's nomads and even the cattle rustlers and thieves alike.

The backlash has already started with the called boycott by ODM of Uhuru Kenyatta's Brookside milk. I heard that people are prefering powder milk to the fresh Brookside one. Kenya should not continue this way.

The most important questions that we need to ask our selves, is who stands to lose, most? In my opinion, it is the business men and the economy. Now the people who are to lose most are those who have invested heavily in the Kenyan economy.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Well done
written by pndiangui , January 28, 2008
Now you have hit the Nail right above its escaping head.
I have written of the same but I am afraid I didnt get it as well articulated as you have and even with glaringly more closer evidence on Raila's double-standards.
But again , the constituency of his supporters makes such a huge percentage of the Kenyan voter. Whether they support him willingly , out of fear or without the know of who he really is , its another story all together but the point is they fully support their man. And at this point in time , Kenya needs peace more than political rhetoric, so getting both Kibaki and Raila to work out some sacrifices as Woud says is absolutely key to getting some solution to the current violence.
I see a re-run and an ammended consttution to get us out of the winner-takes it all political competition as the best option we have at this point. However this resolution cannot be arrived at without looking at the conditions that will be attached to it;
1. That we will have a newly composed Electral commission with some legistlation on how the commissioners will be arrived at
2.Clear laws governing resolution of electoral disputes.
3. That all displaced persons must be re-settled or allowed to vote from wherever they are pending their resettlement.
4. That International and local observers will be distributed evenly in all areas of the country.
5. That there will be no violence or intimidation during the voting exercise , and where violence erupts the results of those areas will be deemed not have been free and fair.
6. That a phased Implementation of a re-negotiated and fine-tuned Bomas Draft will begin immediately after the elections.

Otherwise we cannot continue to place the lives of Kenyans at the hands of politicians who dont care a pinch about the well-being of the people without being held accountable to it. To execute and have the test for leadership accountability in Kenya, then a new constitution is the beginning.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Re-run - ha!
written by Ngigi wa Kamau , January 28, 2008
Any calls for a re-run are absolutely misplaced. Raila and his warmongering cabinet have had 28 days since the results were announced to call for an official re-tallying of the votes cast by way of a court petition. Worse still, these goons and 'saints' of the people had 3 days (from Dec 30) within which to demand a recount of the votes without having to go to court.

Have they made us of their constitutional rights? No. Why? Because they planned to evict perceived Kibaki supporters from their strongholds and call for a re-run.

We cannot in all honesty expect that a re-run would be free or fair after a systematic and well-engineered eviction of unwanted ethnic groups from their constituencies of registration.

If the margin of loss was circa 300,000 and the number of the displaced is in the region of 600,000 thousand (not including those who've left without compulsion), any calls for a re-run are in bad faith and calculated to ensure tyranny by an anti-democratic group.

Today, youths in Kisumu and Kakamega went on the rampage to protest the killings and violence in Naivasha. I wonder why they have not been demonstrating over the past three weeks while Gikuyu & Gusii & and Bukusu Kenyans have been evicted from various parts of the Rift Valley.

(...) Unhelpful incitement deleted. we might have let it go in earlier, less-fraught, times, but not now. Eds.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by smukwana , January 29, 2008
Just yesterday, Mr. Odinga expressed displeasure at the alleged police officers who visited his home to issue him with a summons. He stated clearly that there were procedures for doing so that did not require the delivery of the summons to his house. Furthermore he went on to state that "...the law is clear the summons can be published...". The significant part is that he quotes the law here and in the same breath impugns it as impotent. Rather schizophrenic and bound to leave a lot of people confused.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Keep Dreaming of a re-run!
written by Prof. Baya Kob angoshe , January 29, 2008
One of the options on ODM's demand list is that President (Mr.) Kibaki accepts he lost to ODM's Mr. Raila Amolo Odinga and agree to step down for a care taker govenment which would arrange a re-run. What a full plate of dreams?

What is that basis of sayin President Kibaki lost to Mr. Odinga? Didn't ECK chairman, Samuel Kivuitu clarify that he was not sure who fairly won the presidential election? Does that imply it not President Kibaki and so it is the shadow 'president Odinga' who won? It doesn't atke a rocket scientist to decipher the simple message.

Let's say that Mr. Odinga won, for the sake of dramatizing. Why would he rush for a re-run, if he truely won?

How does Mr. Odinga hope to implement the final option in ODM's demand list, i.e. sharing power with President Kibaki, if he will not event take a Prime Minister job, which is subject to constitutional amendment? What other position is he contemplating? Is it Vepee? Is it why he slites VP Mr. Kalonzo? Does he realize Musyoka Kalaonzo was already a two term old MP by the time one Mr.Odinga made it to Parliament?

It's high time chickens are separated from wildfowls.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by BMuthiora , January 29, 2008
I beg to differ with Ndianguis opinion of the solution to the current impasse and chaos in the country.

Whilst it all seems well and worthy to have a re-run, such re-run must be done within the framework of existing laws. No negotiated settlement can substitute laws already in place. Neither the Annan team nor either of the parties ODM and PNU has legal or moral authority to decide on a re-run of the elections. This is a decision that can only properly be made in a court exercising judicial authority.

To this end, the ODM must observe the rule of law by petitioning the courts, that is, if they are not time barred. The executive arm of the government, on the other hand, has a duty not to interfere with the independence of the judiciary, whilst the judiciary must be capable of delivering judgement in the shortest time possible. Perhaps the Annan team ought to commit both sides to accepting the decision of the election court as binding lest we see the scenes currently being witnessed. The court may order a recount, re-tally or re-run which ought to reasonably appease the ODM. The ensuing result should be binding on all. That to me would solve the political crisis by uncovering the truth about who really won the presidential election.


Pending the resolution of the political impasse, more needs to be done to bring about peace and a return to normalcy. The displaced need to get the necessary assurance they would be secure if they returned to their farms. We all need to see the government in control, not hooligans and murderous youth. We need to feel secure in our homes, our businesses and on the roads as we travel. Those guilty of any offence ought to be brought to justice, regardless of their political affiliation or station in life. The government needs to do more to for it currently seems unable to manage the crisis. The government must immediately concede to an inclusive process to bring about national healing by addressing the underlying factors fuelling the crisis. Call it a truth commission or whatever, but the government needs to take the initiative.

I do agree with Ndiangui that we need to jumpstart the constitutional review process but disagree on the model to be used. I think that there are some fundamental factors that have changed since the views of the people were last taken such that these factors are likely to lead to an all new draft. I think, for instance, that the majimbo question needs to be asked again for there are many that may have opined one way or the other but now have a totally different view of it altogether. The process should begin from scratch bearing in mind the changed circumstances the country is faced with and the failure of certain institutions.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Dilemma
written by BMuthiora , January 29, 2008
@smukwana - if one Stanley Livondo succeeds in serving Raila Odinga with summons in his election petition (whether service is effected personally or in the print media), Raila will be faced with a big dilemma: ignore the summons and risk losing his seat, for Livondo may obtain summary judgement after an uncontested petition; or he may enter appearance, accept the jurisdiction of the court and defend the suit at the risk of exposing his double standards, for how can he defend an election petition in court whilst alleging that the courts are impartial? Regrettably, I see Raila remaining true to character and exposing his double standards.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
quid nisi magna latrocinia?
written by aeichener , January 29, 2008
such re-run must be done within the framework of existing laws. No negotiated settlement can substitute laws already in place.


How dare you invoke the "laws" in a robbers' den like Kenya?

Remota itaque iustitia quid sunt regna nisi magna latrocinia? Quia et latrocinia quid sunt nisi parva regna? Manus et ipsa hominum est, imperio principis regitur, pacto societatis astringitur, placiti lege praeda dividitur.

St. Augustinus, De Civitate Dei, 4,4

Alexander
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by BMuthiora , January 29, 2008
Touche.

But I do not see any better choices out of this impasse that are consistent with respect for the rule of law other than ODM submitting to the courts appinted by the confederacy of robbers that now form the government.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by manta ray , January 30, 2008
Well written and with great clarity. May i add that the real issue is no longer a dispute over the election result but a determined effort to bring down the perceived Kikuyu hegemonic monolith. THAT is the real deal with Raila.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Give that man a toy crown
written by aeichener , January 30, 2008
You are so right, Manta Ray. The election riggings (note plural!) were what sparked the initial conflict, but spontaneous incidents violence had alreddy flared up before, and the fuel to be burned had been painstakingly assembled for months before.

(Title: "Give that man a toy crown"smilies/wink.gif

It is not possible to take out Raila of the common swimming pool right now (any direct action against the man would cause a true civil war), but one might instead banish him on an uninhabited island, and crown him "Emperor of the Great Lake" there (ceremonies can be copied from Bokassa).

This way, both his unbwogable greed and delusions of grandeur, and the Kenyan people would be served well.

Alexander
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re: quid nisi magna latrocinia
written by MZALENDO , January 30, 2008
such re-run must be done within the framework of existing laws. No negotiated settlement can substitute laws already in place.


How dare you invoke the "laws" in a robbers' den like Kenya?

Remota itaque iustitia quid sunt regna nisi magna latrocinia? Quia et latrocinia quid sunt nisi parva regna? Manus et ipsa hominum est, imperio principis regitur, pacto societatis astringitur, placiti lege praeda dividitur.

St. Augustinus, De Civitate Dei, 4,4

Alexander


Anciant Roman Parliament had representation of all sorts of "special interests". These included prostitutes, weapon manufacturers, craftsmen etc....

However, the one i found most interesting was the representative for thieves. There was an M.P for the guild of thieves!! Think about it......
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re: Give that man a toy crown
written by manta ray , January 30, 2008
You are so right, Manta Ray. The election riggings (note plural!) were what sparked the initial conflict, but spontaneous incidents violence had alreddy flared up before, and the fuel to be burned had been painstakingly assembled for months before.

(Title: "Give that man a toy crown"smilies/wink.gif

It is not possible to take out Raila of the common swimming pool right now (any direct action against the man would cause a true civil war), but one might instead banish him on an uninhabited island, and crown him "Emperor of the Great Lake" there (ceremonies can be copied from Bokassa).

This way, both his unbwogable greed and delusions of grandeur, and the Kenyan people would be served well.

Alexander


The media is also a major factor in allowing the atmosphere for such ethnic cleansing to ripen to this point.

Today, i got irrefutable proof when both Nation TV and KTN, in their 7.00pm bulletins, failed to report that Jendayi Frazier has categorically stated on CNN and other networks that there is/was a deliberate effort to ethnically cleanse the Kikuyu from the Rift Valley and hence the current violence characterised by revenge and retaliation by the Kikuyu. Instead, when they did report on what Jendayi said, it was to claim, with ill concealed glee, that the US Government wil impose sanctions if there is no dialogue.
WHY would these local stations choose to deliberately ignore such a significant report? Is it just stupidity, poor judgement by Senior editors, or just good old malice and spite? Would dialogue not include and involve discussing the open secret that is ethnic cleansing?
I think our media should just be closed down under emergency powers as, even in the heat of the current crisis, they can choose to behave so irresponsibly, then pretend to be holier than thou when asked to account for their idiotic behaviour.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by manta ray , January 31, 2008
what Kenya's media is not reporting. See this from the bbc:



"Ms Frazer described the forced removal of members of Mr Kibaki's Kikuyu tribe, which she witnessed in the eastern Rift Valley region immediately following the election, as "clear ethnic cleansing".

"The aim originally was not to kill, it was to cleanse, it was to push them out of the region," she said.

"I met with the individuals who were victims of the violence - they all said that they were being pushed out of the area, that organised groups came to them and said: 'You must leave your house by a certain time'."

Ms Frazer went on to denounce the continuing ethnic clashes across the country, which have seen Kikuyus launch reprisal attacks on Luos and Kalenjins, who largely backed Mr Odinga in the election.

"The cycle of retaliation has gone too far and become more dangerous," she added, warning that now "killing may be the object".

The UN's special adviser for the prevention of genocide, Francis Deng, has said he is sending one of his members of staff to observe the situation in Kenya.

"At the moment I would not use the word genocide," he told the BBC's Network Africa programme. "At the moment we are concerned about certain atrocities that could conceivably escalate if they're not stopped."
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by aeichener , January 31, 2008
There is a compelling *legal* (not factual) reason for Jendayi Frazer to insist upon using the wording "ethnic cleansing" rather than "genocide". This reason is the same as in previous cases, and Deng is also aware of it.

A.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re:
written by MZALENDO , January 31, 2008
There is a compelling *legal* (not factual) reason for Jendayi Frazer to insist upon using the wording "ethnic cleansing" rather than "genocide". This reason is the same as in previous cases, and Deng is also aware of it.

A.


I remember Clinton when he was answering a deposition on the Lewinsky issue answering with the same clarity as this legalese! (that depends on what the definition of is, is!).

I am a simple man. the difference is the same!!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Savant , January 31, 2008
(User IP banned. You were warned. Ed.)
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by aeichener , January 31, 2008
No Mzalendo, I do not think it is merely a blowjob's difference here (though "make love not war" would be a very appreciable motto for Kenyans in these days).

The difference is one between required international intervention and not required (though possible) intervention. That's why the legalistic Sudan (Darfur) situation assessment is so contentious.

Alexander
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Write comment

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
Last Updated ( Monday, 28 January 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >


Archives | About Us | KenyaImagine How To | Privacy Policy | ContactUs | Join KenyaImagine |  Advertise Here| Legal Disclaimer | Terms & Conditions | Directory
rss-2.png

 

Copyright 2009 KenyaImagine.com, the KenyaImagine logo and KenyaImagine.com are trademarks of  The Imagine Company