|
Justice without vengeance |
|
|
|
|
Written by Job Obonyo
|
|
Saturday, 01 September 2007 |
In the aftermath of the Kroll Report, and of President Moi's announcement that he would back President Kibaki's re-election, many have tried to draw an equivalence between the stand of Raila Odinga, and that of President Kibaki.
It is important however, that we note and take into account the difference
between political rhetoric and action. Kenya does have a terrible past, but it is important that the leadership is able to seperate its passions against those crimes from the steps it will take to remedy them. This is a topic (Justice
without Vengeance / looted Kenyan funds) I have discussed in person with
a key individual among those opposed to President Kibaki that I'll not mention in
name. A politician can do two antagonistic things at the same
time, harp political rhetoric offering sympathy while at the same time acting in the exactly opposite spirit -gathering evidence
for prosecution.
Raila Odinga may have been telling Moi (not
necessarily Moi himslef but the Rift Valley electorate) that he (Raila)
was saving the Mzee's skin, whilst all the while serving his patriotic
duty to Kenya by identifying and introducing Kroll Associates to
Kiraitu Murungi, the then Justice and Constitutional Affairs Minister.
It
is on record that it was Raila Odinga (then Roads & Housing Minister) who took Kiraitu Murungi to Kroll Associates's UK offices as soon as
Narc took over government in 2003 -with the sole purpose of
facilitating the identification and recovery of stolen funds, looted
during the previous two regimes.
Thus, when Raila was initially
doing his political trial runs, strategizing on how to penetrate and
endear himself towards the Rift Valley electorate, he contemplated and
actually went ahead to use rhetoric offering sympathy towards
Moi, with statements like " I protected him when the Cabinet wanted to kick him out of Kabarnet Gardens Home" or " I
talked Kibaki out of prosecuting him" and so on. These words were obviously intended as mere political rhetoric. It's a tough balancing act, you see-this
business is no joke and there's much more at play than is immediately obvious.
But deep down his conscience, Raila Odinga always knew that he
had a commitment to seek justice on behalf of Kenyan taxpayers who's pockets had been picked in sums running into hundreds of billions. He did this in the past and is
still doing it on behalf of the poor taxpayers being haemorrhaged
lifeless.
It is important also to realise that it was in fact only President Kibaki who
had the ultimate power to kick Moi out of Kenya's official VP residence
and also it was only the he who could signify the political will to
initiate prosecutions against Moi. His best intentions notwithstanding, the Lanag'ata MP had no powers to do
any of that.
It is also true as has already been pointed out, that ODM is also loaded with many
politicians whose past is no better than that of those now being exposed in the Kroll report. A situation that presents the party with yet another call for a tough balancing act. These are the very
reasons why sound judgement and clarity of mind are needed for the
Kenyan presidency, more than ever.
But it also explains why it's foolhardy to
put political premium on a 77 year old, unhealthy president already
held hostage by the corruption networks; or a "weak" yesteryear sycophant
loyal to the same corruption schemers. I can pledge with certainty that in the very likely
case that ODM gets a chance to govern, that bridge (balancing act)
will be crossed in a manner that this title aptly
captures, Justice without Vengeance!
Trackback(0)
|
|
Last Updated ( Saturday, 01 September 2007 )
|
There are not many that think that Moi's support for Kibaki will turn the tide in the latters' favour, there is a sense of panic about the whole issue though and probably occasioned the release of the Kroll report in the first place.