|
Kenya's crisis talks continue - four documents |
|
|
|
|
Written by Updates
|
|
Wednesday, 05 March 2008 |
Published below are four documents from the continuing mediation effort
aimed at getting longer term solutions to the Kenyan crisis.
Constitutional Review.
|
Kenya
National Dialogue and Reconciliation
Longer Term Issues
and Solutions: Constitutional Review
Background
Recalling the 1 February 2008 agreement by the Parties to deal with long-term
issues and solutions that may have constituted the underlying causes of the
prevailing social tensions, instability and cycle of violence, and recalling the
substantial discussions that have been held concerning constitutional reform
over recent years, the Parties to the Kenyan National Dialogue and Reconciliation
agree to the following general parameters and principles for the establishment
of a constitutional review processes.
General principles and stages of the
process
The parties accept that the constitution
belongs to the people of Kenya who must be consulted appropriately at all key
stages of the process, including the formation of the process itself, the
draft, the parliamentary process and any final enactment. There will be five
stages in the review of the Constitution and there will be consultation with
stakeholders in each stage:
An inclusive process will be initiated and completed within 8 weeks to establish
a statutory Constitutional Review including a timetable. It is envisaged that
the review process will be completed within 12 months from the initiation in
Parliament.
Parliament will enact a special
‘constitutional referendum law’ which will establish the powers and enactment
processes for approval by the people in a referendum.
The statutory process will
provide for the preparation of a comprehensive draft by stakeholders and with
the assistance of expert advisers.
Parliament will consider and
approve the resulting proposals for a new constitution.
The new constitution will be put
to the people for their consideration and enactment in a referendum.
|
| |
Commission into the Elections.
|
Kenya
National Dialogue and Reconciliation
Independent Review Committee
Terms
of Reference
The
members of the Panel of Eminent African Personalities (The Panel), together
with the Parties to the National Dialogue and Reconciliation:
Recalling
the 14 February 2008 agreement by the Parties, witnessed by H.E. Kofi Annan for
the Panel of Eminent African Personalities, to establish an Independent Review
Committee, a non-judicial body, which would be mandated to investigate all
aspects of the 2007 Presidential Election and make findings and recommendations
to improve the electoral process;
Agreed that the Independent Review Committee (IREC) will be established under
the
Commissions
of Inquiry Act, and will conduct its mandate in accordance with the following
Terms of Reference:
Key Activities
The
activities of the IREC shall be:
a.
Analysis of the constitutional and legal framework to establish the basis for
the conduct of the 2007 elections and to identify any weaknesses or
inconsistencies in the electoral legislation;
b.
Examination of the organizational structure, composition, and management
systems of the Electoral Commission of Kenya (ECK) to assess its independence,
capacity and functioning during the preparation and conduct of the 2007
elections;
c.
Examination of the public participation in the 2007 electoral process and the
electoral environment, including the roles and conduct of the political
parties, media, civil society and observers;
d.
Investigation of the organization and conduct of the 2007 electoral operations
including: civic and voter education; training; voter registration; logistics
and security; polling and counting; vote tabulation and results processing; and
dispute resolution;
e.
Investigation into the vote counting and tallying for the entire election with
special attention to the presidential elections in order to assess the
integrity of the results and make recommendations for improvements, adjustments
or overhaul of the system.
f.
Assess the functional efficiency of the ECK and its capacity to discharge its
mandate;
g.
Proposal of recommendations on electoral reform including constitutional,
legislative, operational and institutional aspects, as well as on accountability
mechanisms for ECK Commissioners and staff pertaining to electoral
malpractices, in order to improve future electoral processes;
h.
Presentation of its findings on the above activities;
i.
Any other tasks that the IREC may deem necessary in fulfilling its mandate.
National
Cooperation
All
national authorities whose activities have a substantive relationship to the
above activities are requested to extend maximum cooperation to the IREC. The
IREC shall be permitted access to all electoral materials
Composition
The
IREC will comprise seven members, including a Chair, all of whom having the
highest professional standing and personal integrity. The Chair will be an
internationally recognized eminent jurist. The other members of the Committee
will be experienced electoral experts:
•
Four will be Kenyan, two of whom will be nominated by the Government/PNU and
two nominated by the ODM.
•
The remaining three members will be international experts, nominated by the
Panel, following consultation with the Government/PNU and the ODM.
A
Support Office will be established to provide substantive and administrative
support to the Committee. It will be based in Nairobi
and headed by an international electoral expert.
Methodology
In
the performance of its functions, the Committee:
a.
Shall hold public hearings in Nairobi
and at such other places as it shall deem necessary for the proper discharge of
its mandate;
b.
May hold private hearings whenever it becomes necessary to instil confidence in
the people appearing before the committee or to allay their fears of adversity
or reprisals;
c.
May carry out or cause to be carried out such studies or research as may inform
it on its mandate;
d. May receive written memoranda from individuals and groups
on all issues relevant to its mandate;
e. Shall have access to all the electoral and related
documents necessary for the effective discharge of its mandate;
f. Shall publish its rules of procedure in the Kenya
Gazette; and
g. Subject to the foregoing, the Committee shall develop its
own work plan and procedures.
Outputs and Timeline
The IREC should start its work no later than 15 March, 2008. Within three to six
months of the commencement of its work, the IREC will produce a final report of
its findings and recommendations that will be submitted to the President, with
a copy to the Panel. The report will subsequently be made public, in English
and Swahili, within 14 days of submission.
Financing/Logistics
The Committee will be funded by the Kenyan Government and
the Trust Fund for
National Dialogue and Reconciliation, and with logistic
support from the African Union and the United Nations.
|
| |
Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
|
Kenyan National
Dialogue and Reconciliation
Truth, Justice and
Reconciliation Commission
Background
Recalling the 14
February 2008 agreement by the Parties for a Truth, Justice and
Reconciliation Commission, and in a spirit of reconciliation
and national healing;
The Parties to the Kenyan National Dialogue and
Reconciliation agree to the following general parameters and principles for the
establishment of such a commission:
General Parameters
A Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Commission (“the
Commission”) will be created through an Act of Parliament, which will be
adopted by the legislature within the next four weeks. The Commission will
inquire into human rights violations, including those committed by the state,
groups, or individuals. This includes but is not limited to politically
motivated violence, assassinations, community displacements, settlements, and
evictions. The Commission will also inquire into major economic crimes, in
particular grand corruption, historical land injustices, and the illegal or
irregular acquisition of land, especially as these relate to conflict or
violence. Other historical injustices shall also be investigated.
The Commission will inquire into such events which took place between December 12, 1963 and February 28, 2008. However, it will
as necessary look at antecedents to this date in order to understand the
nature, root causes, or context that led to such violations, violence, or
crimes.
The Commission shall receive statements from victims, witnesses, communities,
interest groups, persons directly or indirectly involved in events, or any
other group or individual; undertake investigations and research; hold
hearings; and engage in activities as it determines to advance national or
community reconciliation. The Commission may offer confidentiality to persons
upon request, in order to protect individual privacy or security, or for other
reasons. The Commission shall solely determine whether its hearings shall be
held in public or in camera.
No blanket amnesty will be provided for past crimes. Individual amnesty may be recommended
by the Commission in exchange for the full truth, provided that serious international
crimes (crimes against humanity, war crimes, or genocide) are not amnestied, nor
persons who bear the greatest responsibility for crimes covered by the
Commission. The Commission will complete its work and submit a final report
within two years. The final report shall state its findings and
recommendations, which will be submitted to the President and will be made
public in fourteen days and tabled in Parliament.
Guiding Principles
The Commission will reflect the following principles and
guidelines, taking into account international standards and best practices:
Independence:
The Commission shall operate free from political or other influence. It
shall determine its own specific working methodologies and work plan, including
for investigation and reporting, and will set out its own budget and staff
plan.
Fair and balanced inquiry:
In all of its work, the Commission shall ensure that it seeks the truth without
influence from other factors. In representations to the public through
hearings, statements, or its final report, the Commission shall ensure that a
fair representation of the truth is provided.
Appropriate powers: The
Commission shall be given powers of investigation, including the right to call
persons to speak with the Commission, and powers to make recommendations that
shall be considered and implemented by the government or others. These recommendations
may include measures to advance community or national reconciliation; institutional
or other reforms, or whether any persons should be held to account for past
acts.
Full cooperation:
Government and other State offices shall provide information to the
Commission on request, and
provide access to archives or other sources of information. It is urged that
other Kenyan and international individuals and organizations also provide full cooperation
and information to the Commission on request.
Financial support: The
Parties encourage strong financial support to the Commission. It is expected
that the Government of Kenya will provide a significant portion of the
Commission’s budget. Other funding may be obtained by the Commission from
donors, foundations, or other independent sources.
Selection and Composition
The Commission will consist of seven members, with gender balance taken into
account.
Three of the members shall be international. The members
shall be persons of high moral integrity, well regarded by the Kenyan
population, and shall include a range of skills, backgrounds, and professional
expertise. As a whole, the Commission shall be perceived as impartial in its
collectivity, and no member should be seen to represent a specific political group.
At least two but no more than five of the seven commissioners should be
lawyers.
In keeping with international best practices, and to ensure
broad public trust in and ownership of the process of seeking the truth, the
national members of the Commission shall be chosen through a consultative
process. The Commissioners shall be named no more than eight weeks after the
passage of the Act that establishes the Commission. The three international
members shall be selected by the Panel of Eminent African Personalities, taking
into account public input.
|
| |
Commission of Inquiry into the Violence.
|
Kenyan National
Dialogue and Reconciliation
Commission of
Inquiry on Post-Election Violence
Background
Recalling that the Parties have previously agreed to:
Identify and agree on the modalities of implementation of
immediate measures aimed at:
• Ensuring the impartial, effective and expeditious investigation
of gross and systematic violations of human rights and that those found guilty
are brought to justice.
And have expressed a commitment to:
• Identification and prosecution of perpetrators of
violence, including State security agents
• Addressing issues of accountability and transparency
The Parties to the National Dialogue and Reconciliation,
together with the Panel of Eminent African Personalities (The Panel), agree to
the establishment of a Commission of Inquiry on Post-Election
Violence (Commission of Inquiry).
This Commission of Inquiry will be a non-judicial body
mandated
(i) to investigate the facts and
surrounding circumstances related to acts of violence that followed the 2007
Presidential Election,
(ii) investigate the actions or omissions
of State security agencies during the course of the violence, and make
recommendation as necessary, and
(iii) to recommend measures of a legal,
political or administrative nature, as appropriate, including measures with
regard to bringing to justice those persons responsible for criminal acts. The
Commission of Inquiry aims to prevent any repetition of similar deeds and, in
general, to eradicate impunity and promote national reconciliation in Kenya.
Key Activities
The activities of the Commission shall be:
To investigate the facts and circumstances related to the
violence following the 2007 Presidential election, between December 28, 2007 and February 28, 2008.
• To prepare and submit a final report containing its
findings and recommendations for redress, any legal action that should be
taken, and measures for future prevention.
• To prepare and submit a final report containing its
findings and recommendations for redress, any legal action that should be
taken, and measures for future prevention.
• To make recommendations, as it deems appropriate, to the
Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Commission.
National Cooperation
Kenyan authorities, institutions, parties, and others shall
fully cooperate with the Commission of Inquiry in the accomplishment of its
mandate, in response to requests for information, security, assistance or
access in pursuing investigations, including:
• Adoption by the Government of Kenya of any measures needed
for the Commission and its personnel to carry out their functions throughout
the national territory with full freedom, independence and security;
• Provision by the Government of Kenya and all Kenyan State
institutions of all information in its possession which the commission requests
or is otherwise needed to carry out its mandate, with free access provided for
the Commission and its staff to any archives related to its mandate;
• Freedom for the Commission to obtain any information it
considers relevant and to use all sources of information which it considers
useful and reliable;
• Freedom for the Commission to interview, in private, any
persons it judges necessary;
• Freedom for the Commission to visit any establishment or
place at any time; and
• Guarantee by the Government of Kenya of full respect for
the integrity, security and freedom of witnesses, experts and any other persons
who help in its work; The Parties call upon States, relevant UN and AU bodies
and, as appropriate, national and international humanitarian or other
nongovernmental organizations to provide information to the Commission of
Inquiry related to post-election violence, to make such information available
as soon as possible and to provide appropriate assistance to the Commission.
Composition
The Commission of Inquiry will be composed of three
impartial, experienced, and internationally respected jurists, or experts in
addressing communal conflict or ethnic violence. Two of these shall be
international, and one shall be Kenyan. They shall be selected by the Panel
following consultation with the Government/PNU and the ODM, and appointed by
the President.
A Support Office, based in Nairobi
and with adequate expert staff, will be established to provide support to the
members of the Commission.
Methodology
The Commission of Inquiry shall develop its own work plan
and procedures. These will be guided in all respects by principles of fairness,
impartiality, transparency, and good faith.
Outputs and Timeline
The Commission of Inquiry will start its work within 30 days
following the appointment of its members. It will operate for three months,
with an additional month if required. At the conclusion of its work it will
submit a final report of its findings and recommendations to the President of
Kenya, with a copy to the Panel. Main findings of the report will be made
public within 14 days of submission, although certain aspects of the report or
annexes may be kept confidential in order to protect the identity of witnesses
or persons accused.
Financing/Logistics
The Commission of Inquiry will be funded by the Kenyan
Government and the Trust Fund for National Dialogue and Reconciliation,
including support from donor states or foundations. It will receive logistical
support from the AU and the UN.
|
| |
|
Updates |
| About the author: |
| kenyaImagine editors will keep you updated on the latest news in Kenya and the world. Write to us if you are interested in being featured in our updates:
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
|
Trackback(0)
|
|
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 05 March 2008 )
|
|
If you read between the lines of the above documents you will find that the time limits and manpower set on the investigations are ridicously short. Furthermore there is no mentioning of extending the commissions if they are not finished. A serious commission would work until its finished - not with a set time limit. A quartly report on progress could be in line.
For example: Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission:
Two years and then they report to the president. A single complex case can take a hoard of investigators that time just to undig some of the facts. And here they want to look at all things from 1967 until now? I hope they start with now and works backwards. But maybe I got it all backwards?
Please explain to me why im wrong..