purchase viagra onlinebuy CIALIS 20mgbuy cialis online
Home
Silent Genocide PDF Print E-mail
Written by Collins Mbalo   
Thursday, 12 April 2007

As I watched "Agenda Kenya" yesterday on a local television, it suddenly downed on me that perhaps as a nation we are yet to grasp the enormity and the seriousness of the situation prevailing in Mt Elgon and Bungoma areas in Western Kenya.

With no official statement as of yet from the Government one cannot preclude complicity. With one stark word I state its "Genocide"- on our own backyard!

According to Article 11 of the 1948 International Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide(provision of which is replicated in Article IV & VI of the Rome Statute of The International Criminal Court) the crime of genocide is defined as consisting of two elements: the first the mental element which involves seeking to destroy in whole or in part a national, ethnic, racial or religious group as such and secondly,the physical element which includes inter alia killing members of a group, causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of a group, deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part... et cetera. The Convention further continues to criminalize the act of Genocide, complicity, incitement and attempting to commit Genocide. Unfortunately both these elements are manifest in the prevailing clashes between the warring communities in Mt Elgon Area.

While the International community has manifestly shown it's abhorrence of these kinds of acts or omissions, on the other hand serious questions are posed about our view and resolve as a nation with regard to this sad state of affairs to wit: what has, what will and what can be done to stop and curtail the wanton destruction of property and loss of life that result from such clashes.

As the cinders of burnt houses continue to smoulder in Bungoma and Mt Elgon area in western Kenya the genuinely concerned Kenyan must ask why? What has gone wrong? Is some life so cheap? Is the Government responsible and if so to what extent? Might there be complicity from the Local administration, from the intelligence community and the state's security machinery? Finally, what role should the government play in curbing the skirmishes and preventing future repetitions of violent clashes especially over land within the Republic?

While we acknowledge that violent land clashes are not a preserve of Kenya only; the international scene has witnessed during the month of March 2007 violent land clashes in Nandigram area -south of Calcutta in India, Guangdong land clashes in China ,Masindi area in Uganda, North West province of Cameroon and our neighboring country Ethiopia. The reasons for these flares-up vary but a common denominator in these clashes is-Government Policy gone wrong.

With regard to the Mt. Elgon clashes, the negligence of Kenya's governments past and present has been the greatest factor. It defeats reason that a Government would be willing and eager time and again to send its military forces using the tax payer's funds on peacekeeping missions in far away countries but be lethargic to do so when such conflicts are occurring only a few miles from its own military barracks - Moi Barracks near Soy. In the strongest terms possible we as Kenyan people must condemn such hypocrisy and abdication of duty.

The fact that violent clashes continue to recur with little or insignificant prosecution of perpetrators portends a worrying state. The country still continues to court a culture of impunity as was evidenced in a Prime News item on a local TV station as recently as yesterday when one citizen from the warring factions (Ogiek community) made an inflammatory statement threatening death and destruction to the Soi community with the comfort of knowing nothing serious will be done. Our politicians continue to churn inflammatory comments, vigilante organized militia (the likes of Mungiki, Chinkororo, Taliban, Kamjesh, Msumbiji...etc) continue to exist and extort Kenyans, often with political backing.

That aside we watch with terror as part of our country is turned into a war zone with armed and well trained militia engaging in wanton acts of destruction of human life and property. The military should urgently be deployed to arrest and curtail the situation. With close to 60,000 people displaced and over110 lives reportedly lost it's just not enough to send the local police with the backing of the paramilitary General Service Unit while our adequately trained military forces relax in the Barracks. Lives are being lost to determined militants armed with guns, machetes, bows and every kind of crude weapon imaginable. This should send chills to the man restfully sleeping at State House and his cabinet.

Just like Koffi Anan commented on the 10th Anniversary of the 1994 Rwanda Genocide we must acknowledge that "Such crimes cannot be reversed. Such failures cannot be repaired. The dead cannot be brought back to life! "And that it is our responsibility to ‘do more' and in a ‘timely fashion' to prevent the wanton killing, maiming of individuals and destruction of property by the organized militia of one race against another.

It is sad, shameful and aggravating to see that due to our inaction our fellow citizens are now refugees in neighboring Uganda having been forced to abandon their home nation, the one that their forefathers fought for while our members of parliament haggle in luxurious hotels and resorts over how to gain power over them.

True there may be no ready or immediate solutions to land clashes in Kenya but with the benefit of hindsight we certainly realize land clashes were not the preserve of the KANU -Moi Government. It is a social problem that continues to glare its ugly face time and again in this republic. More must be done than endlessly cry wolf . Urgent long term solutions must be sought which should emanate from and incorporate the views of the diverse Kenyan public, a mission much more urgent and important than the clamor for minimum reforms.

The Need to Legislate

After 9/11 attacks in the USA, the Government -under international pressure- hurriedly proceeded to draft an Anti- Terrorism bill which was manifestly unjust and unconstitutional, a cynical effort to please our partners in the West. Yet time and again the lives of the citizenry have been lost and in grave danger yet not even the feeblest attempts have been made to legislate and seek long lasting solutions to this problem. This again being hypocrisy and betrayal of the ideals upon which this nation is founded. It's in this vein that I propose an Ethnic Crimes Bill should be expeditiously drafted by the Attorney General with input from prominent scholars, technical expertise and input from the legal fraternity by and large to punish, prevent and curb crime motivated by ethnic hatred.

A further long lasting attempt to gain a solution would be for the President to appoint a permanent Presidential Commission on Land/Ethnic Clashes with the mandate to: investigate and identify the root causes, derive solutions and especially to undertake a mass education campaign against perpetuating ethnic rivalry and hatred. The commission should further contribute to the continuous Legislation against these sorts of Acts or Omissions. If need be the commission should become a statutory commission vide an Act of Parliament. It must be remembered that a single flare can set a whole forest on fire. Subsequently,no Kenyan is safe due to the fact that they are not in Mount Elgon, or Likoni or North Horr when these clashes occur.

As we will settle down to sleep tonight, it pains to realize that thousands of fellow Kenyans will not enjoy the luxury of peaceful sleep. They will not sleep in the comfort of their homes but in fear and with the knowledge their country is not doing enough in their behalf.


Collins Mbalo
About the author:
Collins Mbalo blogs at the Nairobian's Perspective ! where he writes on everything from economics, social and political issues in Kenya.




Digg!Del.icio.us!Google!Facebook!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Trackback(0)
Comments (16)add
0
...
written by Stephen Wanyama , April 12, 2007
The word genocide must be used ,oh so sparingly', really it must. I see this as more of a clash for survival between groups cramped into a small piece of land and struggling to get by on Kibaki's much vaunted economic growth.

About the government. Yes, one hopes Kenyans will be a little more mature now. Blaming Moi for the land clashes made it very easy to ignore the situation that actually caused the friction between the people on the frontlines, and the procrastination resulted in our present situation. Mau, Mt. Elgon.

P.S Why do Kenyans persist in using such offensive terms as Ndorobo, Hottentots, Bushmen or Akatas?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Amir Ibrahim , April 12, 2007
While passion and emotions are good spurs to action, it is vital that we appreciate just how tenuous the line is between a proper reaction and an over-reaction.

The army must stay in the barracks as much as is possible. Their training and culture is not suited for the delicate work of enforcing the law.

I do not think it is true however that we tend to ignore the plight of Kenya's smaller communities. The reaction to these clashes like those in Mau or Narok or Burnt Forest or Likoni will always be a yawn, unless some kin are involved in it. The rural-urban divide in Kenya is a bigger schism than we accept.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re:
written by emmo opoti , April 12, 2007

The army must stay in the barracks as much as is possible. Their training and culture is not suited for the delicate work of enforcing the law.

Hear, hear!

On the matter of new laws, I would suggest that the Americans anti-terror bills have been entirely unsuccessful and that they serve merely to to promote public confidence that the government is acting. There is no crime that would be committed here that is not already covered in our statutes.

Incitement, murder, causing public unrest, illegal arms and arms trafficking, arson all of these are already proscribed under codified law.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
new era for armed rebels
written by Job , April 12, 2007
Needless to point, the government's reaction to these massacres is not surprising,...casual, withdrawn, inept, and insensitive.

I must say that as a nation, we are subtly sitting on many time-bombs as population growth continues to exert pressure on limited land. This is more pronounced in fertile lands of Rift Valley or such highlands as Mt. Elgon.

From the first few responses to this article, the casual manner (bordering on insensitive) in which this tragedy is being minimized begs serious questions. We need to appreciate the fact that when more than 100 people are killed and 60,000 displaced, then the matter goes beyond reduction to a simple "clash for survival". It is thus not suprising that the people holding government offices harbour a similar mindset.

The government's inability /failure to address such current and potential conflicts amicably exposes further, it's lack of vision, incompetence and policy-bereftness.

These shortcomings are not confined to executive government, what has the legislature done? What efforts are being undertaken by the local elected leaders? What about the human rights groups straddling the civil society realm?

Alarmingly, Didn't I read that an armed rebel force has been formed right under the nose of the government.

This event may have already ushered in a new era (sadly) for the future.

Job
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Stephen Wanyama , April 12, 2007
Mr. Obonyo,
I am not trying to diminish the enormity of the events in the Mt. Elgon area. It is a true emergency, but it is also a clash for survival.

This does not mean that we should sit back and watch, but only that in addition to an effort to stop the violence we must also seek to address the underlying causes, which as you in your post describe.

I must say that as a nation, we are subtly sitting on many time-bombs as population growth continues to exert pressure on limited land. This is more pronounced in fertile lands of Rift Valley or such highlands as Mt. Elgon.


I retain my position beside Amir and Emmo, the armed forces should never be employed against our own people, it sets precedents that will result in the sort of consequences unleashed on the Ndebele during the Gukurahundi campaign.

There are police services that can deal with the situation, sufficient;y armed and trained.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Honey Rider , April 12, 2007
My understanding is that it is not about Kenyans slaughtering each other, but Sebeys from Uganda also having joined the feud, keen on driving animals across the boder.

In the 1992 clashes that sent Bukusus out of Mt. Elgon, Sebeys again played part, reinforcing Sabaot armies against foreighners. They were supported by the govt of the day, which took it upon itself to import mishale ya sumu made in Korea for their fighters. As one whose origins lie in Bungoma, our knowledge of the issue was that Moi told one 'Serut' that he was 'not to allow grass grow' all the way into the house, it had to be cut. Bungoma was firmly in opposition, and disgraced Moi as he attempted to campaign in Webuye. One former MP of Kanduyi, Mr. Sifuna then told Moi off, urging him to pray to the Gods to never allow rain in Bungoma, and only then would the Bukusus beg his aid, in addition to blocking any kind of trade btwn them and the Ugandans. The 'grass' happened to be the non-sabaots (bukusus majority) who had encroched on the rich mt. Elgon land, farming and trading with the non-farming sabaots.
It was a bitter feud that most sabaots regretted later on. They lost heavily too. In mid 90's, several sabaots were heard and seen begging their former neighbors to return, for Mt. Elgon District was only a name without other communities. There was nothing to show for it. Public aminities were non-existant. To put it as our hometechnician wants put it, a district on top of a hill, whose residents must come down to Bungoma district for water, but the Bungoma people would not allow it. True indeed, for the District was run from Bungoma, and the Bukusus angry at their losses paid back by sending sabaot children out of Bungoma schools, even killing some along the way.

When someone mentions land as the issue, I think they dont seem to get it. Moreso, this would mean having to fight over Transnzoia, which represents almost all Kenyan tribes. Any one who knows about the rich agricultural schemes in the area, also knows the number of people from all over Kenya they attracted. Luos, Kikuyus, Kambas, Luhyas....it is a melting pot of Kenya in its own right. We do not wish to try that path, do we? Sabaots abore farming, and in this day and time, farming is not attractive in Kenya. Large tracts of land are of no use, given that the produce goes to waste for lack of preservation structures.
The current clashes are orchestrated by politicians, not by the sabaots nor Ogiek or any other tribes residing here, and for very selfish reasons too.
Sebeys are opportunist cattle rustlers out for a quick herd.

The mps in the areas know what is going on, Michuki knows what the agenda is, innocent people are dying.

Somoeone needs to stop it.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Debates, Debates, Debates
written by That Kenyan Loser , April 12, 2007
While you're all engaged in them, homes continue to burn, people continue to die. The arguments I have read above show that we are'nt any better than those we are blaming. Take a look:

1.
The army must stay in the barracks as much as is possible. Their training and culture is not suited for the delicate work of enforcing the law.

Suddenly we are concerned about acting by the laws? Why should we be so passionate about some laws and not others?
2.
It's in this vein that I propose an Ethnic Crimes Bill should be expeditiously drafted by the Attorney General with input from prominent scholars, technical expertise and input from the legal fraternity by and large to punish, prevent and curb crime motivated by ethnic hatred.

OK. Name one bill Paliament enacted that has been effective in solving the intended problem. The ones benefiting parliament do not count.
3.
They were supported by the govt of the day, which took it upon itself to import mishale ya sumu made in Korea for their fighters. As one whose origins lie in Bungoma, our knowledge of the issue was that Moi told one 'Serut' that he was 'not to allow grass grow' all the way into the house, it had to be cut.

The "government of the day" is not the government of this day. Forget the past, for now, let's think about the problem at hand, please.

4.
These shortcomings are not confined to executive government, what has the legislature done? What efforts are being undertaken by the local elected leaders? What about the human rights groups straddling the civil society realm?

Good questions. The answer is the same to all of them. If there is a human rights organization that goes beyond the comforts of Nairobi, please let me know.

5.
I see this as more of a clash for survival between groups cramped into a small piece of land and struggling to get by on Kibaki's much vaunted economic growth.

Why do we always politicize everything? Isn't it possible to address an issue without sending unrelated, biased, subliminal messages of blame?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by collinsom92 , April 13, 2007
its really sad to see innocent lives being lost just because some Kenyans feel that "groups"of people are clashing over land for survival.Perhaps we can comment so because we can afford the comfort and luxury of seating on our lavish desks while typin on our computers.

I further disagree with Amir Ibrahim and the likes that our military must stay in the barracks.Why? becaue their training and culture does not befit them of undertaking this delicate task.Why then do we send them on peace keeping missions when by training they are known to aggrevate situations,
when we fear that armed militia (civilian or not) may pour over our border from somalia we send them.To protect who that we cant protect now?

We are observing an armed conflict,are we saying that our military are inadequately trained to respond to armed conflict if it emanates from its own citizenry.does not their trianing equipt them to undertake user friendly tasks such as community policing or they are only good for war?are they just good enough to ensure peace in other countries but not our own.

is justice really our shield and defender, how are we going to dwell in unity,peace and liberty when we cannot afford to use our military resources to ensure our own peace from armed militia but can do so for our neighbors.Wo is proud to see fellow Kenyans pour out to Uganda as refugees ?The words of the national anthem and the ideals captured behind them then are meaningless.

we may feel this is an overeaction because the 110,dead and over 60,000 displaced are mere statistics.mind you what if the 60,000 stay put, are they overeacting or fleeing for their lives,what about those maimed and raped over the clashes, the estimated 10,000 children who have had to abandon not only their homes but their means of livelihood and educational studies.

In the developed world an event of these magnitude would not occur without an outcry far above what you are seeing in the print media and discussion forums such as these.

It is in no doubt that failure to heed early warning signals have resulted in some of the worst attrocities that have occured in histry.Frequent flares between the Hutus and Tutsis were ignored until ....the 110 became.....millions.The French army are being blamed at present.why perhaps because ...for them "it may have been one community clashing with the other over scant resources"(hyperbole)that in Africa is what we call 'clashes' between one ethnic group and the other.

Darfur another case point with the Sudanese government refusing international "inteference" after all the Janja weed militia is but agroup of people clashing over scant resources.

Whatever is happening in Mt Elgon is creating alot of international heat with most of the major media houses highlighting it and travel advisories being issued against us!From a haven of peace our country is depicted as a haven of turmoil especilly during election years.while we acknowledge that what we are seeing in Mt Elgon will not rech the magnitude of Darfur or Rwanda we must accept that we need to clean up inhouse.

New legislation?definately!the penal code is not sufficient to stem out some of the vices we are seeing of late no wonder new legislation have been passed over late dealing with matters merely touched on by the penal code such as the Sexual Offences Act.A new Act would be appropriate in punishing some of the almost cancerous vices we see including nepotism which time nd again leads to these 'clashes'
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Posse Comitatus
written by Tim Norwood , April 13, 2007
Sec. 1385. - Use of Army and Air Force as posse comitatus

"Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both".


And quoting from an article of the Cato Institute,
Soldiers are trained to be warriors, not peace officers -- which is as it should be. But putting full-time warriors into a civilian policing situation can result in serious collateral damage to American life and liberty.

It can also undermine military readiness, because when soldiers are forced into the role of police officers, their war-fighting skills degrade.


This does not mean that we do not value the lives being lost in that region, but think about it Collins, if we were to deploy the armed forces every time we had clashes such as these we would have much in the way of collateral damage and long standing grudges against the state. In the aftermath of such action, clashing groups would next be compelled to up the ante by properly arming themselves against the government, which in alternative argot we call a civil war.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Tim Norwood , April 13, 2007
The quote above is from the USA's Posse Comitatus Act. It has been much violated by many other American laws, in the heady tradition of George W, but I believe it retains at its core a great deal of sensible thought.

The principle however is universal. I may also point to the Franfurt glider incident in Germany and the debate is spawned there. Reality, Collins is that the taste of power that a military gets when it is regularly involved in civilian activities in its own country promise down the line to cause real trouble for the relationship between the military and the civilian structure.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by emmo opoti , April 13, 2007
The army should only be brought out of the barracks as a last resort. Their doctrine will probably be to punish so severely as to provide a deterrent, which is tantamount to the state waging war on its citizens. We were not happy when the NRA heli-gunships shot up Kenyan villages, presumably we would prefer our own bullets? Ha!

Collins the Sudanese are not refusing to let the International Community in because they see it as being 'just clashes over resources', they are afraid because the international community is taking sides. The Janjaweed are guilty, but the world seems to gloss over the part played by the local Darfuri groups. Read the Wiki entry here, it is a lot more complex than the media make out and so much more difficult to solve. Read also on the Abuja Conferences and the constant refusal on the part of some Darfuri groups to honour a ceasefire.

The new legislation is now limited to a ban on nepotism? Which is the cause of the clashes?!!

There are so many other factors at play here. There are and have always been arms in the area, primarily as a defence against cattle rustlers. There has also been a long history of low intensity conflict as Patience describes in her post. A consideration of the causes of the violence, or of possible solutions is not proof of apathy. It would be much more harmful to rush blindly in without considering the consequences of a particular action.

Patience,
The difference with TransNzoia could not be more glaring. No group in TransNzoia can claim to have been pushed out of its land, or to have been disenfranchised by the status quo.
Also while farming may nit seem like a good idea to you, it is the only way out for most Kenyans.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re: Debates, Debates, Debates
written by aeichener , April 14, 2007

If there is a human rights organization that goes beyond the comforts of Nairobi, please let me know.


There are many NGOs who are doing grassroots work in the field, tackling the nitty-gritty problem of everyday survival. Mostly these are the NGOs headed and staffed by wazungu. Go figure. The reason for this difference should be clear to you, shouldn't it?

Alexander
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by collinsom92 , April 14, 2007
Has anyone had a chance of looking at section 3(2)of the Armed Forces Act(Cap. 199 Laws of Kenya), and to look at the Service charter of the armed forces as set out in the Ministry of Defence website (http:www.mod.go.ke/aid.htm).

I believe our Armed Forces receive professional training that "may" and should make them apt to the task; the law allows them to intervene and provide support services in maintaining civil order, further the Act proscribes against excesses by servicemen while on public duty.

Gone are the days when we used to paint and picture the military to be but an aggressive, battle tuned and oppressive force. Perhaps that picture served well certain individuals who had control over military resources in deterring political opposition. The military must not be used against its peaceful citizens, but against those who threaten our peaceful existence as a nation including militant outfits operating under the accronym SLDF (Sabaot land defence force).

There are currently talks that the encroachment by the Sabaots due to the clashes might just draw the Bukusu into the clashes... detecting spill over effects, dear sirs?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
A military viewpoint
written by Alexander , April 14, 2007
Kenyans, almost to a single man and woman, seem to have completely forgotten the reality of the "Emergency" experience (or manjeneti, as I am wont to say). This experience, more than everything else, showed that regular armed forces (British regiments as well as Air Force, as well as the Kenya Rifle Regiment) are good and efficient in terrorizing and oppressing the civilian population. Operation Anvil - brutal, deeply racist and inhuman as it was - proved a splendid success, and effectively cut the roots of Mau-Mau support.
But what hunted down the dispersed Mau-Mau fighter groups in the forests, were not the Army, who were singularly clumsy and unsuccessful in this regard. It were small combat units composed of several ex-Mau-Mau (men and women a like), often led by one white Kenyan, and often with one Ogiot scout/guide/tracker.

It would be a tactic like this second-named successful manjeneti tactic that will be able to fight the armed guerillas in Mount Elgon area, not a horde a brutal GSU gorillas burning down houses, destroying primary schools, and raping women and girls.

Alexander
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Kenyan Military Passive
written by kisumuJah , April 17, 2007
Since its inception the armed forces (excluding police and GSU) have done close to nothing but sleep in their baracks and eat duty free foods.

The only piece of action that they ever tasted was the shifta war. Which was like fighting some poorly organised group of somalis.

But now that there is no shiftas anymore why should they sit doing nothing. Look, these fellows dont even move their butts when there is a terrorist attack in Nairobi. Remmember the bombing of the American embassy? American and Isrealis soldiers reached the scene faster than their Kenyan counter part.

Since these fellows have some of the best doctors, egineers, peacemakers etc. Why dont we use these resources.

Look, General Opande is a world renowned peacemaker but nobody in Kenya has ever attempted to use his experince. Is this not the time we needed his advice in Mt Elgon area? Ama vipi wanainch
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
mr.
written by stanslaus , April 14, 2008
As time passby, the political transition in kenya is always marked with blood-shed between certain communities, why? Because the political strength of our leaders is rooted deep into the community elders and spokesmen so to address and redress the issues of tribal and land clashes lies within the the community elders who time and again organizes the community-cultural warriors that turns out as militias groups. youth should shun from the elder patronage.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Write comment

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
Last Updated ( Sunday, 22 June 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >


Archives | About Us | KenyaImagine How To | Privacy Policy | ContactUs | Join KenyaImagine |  Advertise Here| Legal Disclaimer | Terms & Conditions | Directory
rss-2.png

 

Copyright 2009 KenyaImagine.com, the KenyaImagine logo and KenyaImagine.com are trademarks of  The Imagine Company