This article is an extract from my blog and I wanted to post it here and share with fellow Kenyans my wonderment at the international media's degree and slant of coverage on the events in our country.
Living outside the country I know for a fact that Kenya barely gets two
mentions in the international press until people start dying. Does
anyone else get the sense that these guys are like blood thirsty
vultures waiting on the sidelines for Kenya to collapse?
I was watching CNN this morning and I heard Monita Rajpal talking about the 3 larges tribes in Kenya, the Kikuyu, Luhaya and the Luo. My mother was bemused, I was livid. The reason being that I know how many people watch CNN and while under normal circumstances I would just let something like that slide, today, in the context of all the things that are happening in Kenya I was just completely furious.
In case you’re wondering where the error is, there is no such tribe, ethnicity or community as the Luhaya. The correct term is Luhya, as it was written out in bold letters on the screen behind her back where she would have seen it if she had just bothered to turn around and read what was written there. Perhaps I’m over reacting. In fact I’m pretty sure that I’m over-reacting but I’m so fed up with the spin that the international media is putting on this thing and the fact that the tribal thing is being taken out of all proportion.
But she was not all wrong. One thing Rajpal got right was the sad fact that ethnic tension in not new to the election process in Kenya. Sadly, violence has historically been used as a tool to achieve political gains in this country, and not just since 1992 as Rajpal stated, when we had our first post cold war multiple party election, but since 1969 when Jomo Kenyatta used government forces violently against the Luo in order to “stop a rebellion.” At the time Oginga Odinga (Raila’s father) had wanted to register a political party to rival Kenyatta’s KANU and to Kenyatta this opposition was considered a treasonable offence. As I have said in previous commentaries, the explosion we are witnessing in Kenya today, is the end-game of long-held historical misconceptions and deep mistrust that have together been exploited rather than addressed by succeeding governments.
The problem is of course that the scenes of the recent outbreaks of violence have included Kenyan urban areas in Kenya. In the past they were focused entirely in the rural areas of specific parts of the country. Another big difference is that this time around, the violence and its aftermath is being played out under the full glare of local and international media. In 1992 we had only two television channels and one local FM station, all government run and owned. Today we have in Kenya 7 public access television stations (offering among other international stations Al Jazeera, the BBC and CNN), 2 satellite television companies offering international stations and most importantly, more than 30 public access FM stations, many of which are in vernacular languages. Each of these stations is competing to be the one with the scoop, each one competing to gain a name for itself as fearless and passionate.
For all the outrage that this truly is, it bears remembering that more people died in the tribal clashes of 1992 than have died so far in these skirmishes – 1500 in fact. But the international media hardly batted an eyelid then. Today however, following harsh indictment in the past, it seems that the media are scrambling over themselves to have the most gruesome and the most alarming reports possible. Peace initiatives, generosity, the calm days, or tranquil regions do not make for good television, but gore, the starkest doom and comparisons with Rwanda do.
This is not to deny credit to all those putting themselves at great risk to deliver such content. The Kenyan media, in particular the radio stations and KTN and NTV have shown excellent judgment and a great deal of impartiality while reporting. And their new Save our Country initiative, undertaken, thankfully, by all media houses in the country is commendable and should be supported by all well-meaning Kenyans.
What I have found most disturbing is the effect that this characterization of the conflict as merely ethnic is likely having on the future politics of this country. Even as we make peace, and return to normalcy we may very well be sowing the seed for violent future conflict. We already have a legion of violent groups operating in Kenya, the most worrying of which is the Mungiki. When a conflict such as this one is portrayed as one of the Luo targeting the Kikuyu, or using terms like ethnic cleansing as some utterly irresponsible politicians (Alfred Mutua that one’s for you) have been throwing about, it is worrying to think what this group in particular, proclaimed defenders of all things Kikuyu will do.
I’ve been trying to get this message out there to politicians and members of the public. Anyone who can help is greatly welcome to do so because if Mungiki get involved, if we start to have retaliatory attacks on as big a scale as the initial aggression, given the Mungiki's history of ruthlessness, no amount of politics will be able to save our beloved country from the bloodbath that will then ensue.
We cannot solve the current crisis by running away from the truth. The pre-meditated violence against hundreds of Kikuyus was ethnic cleansing - period! Even in their heyday, Mungiki never specifically targeted whole communities like the "warriors" in Eldoret have been doing. However, I must agree that the international media has overblown the Kenyan crisis for commercial interests. This however is not surprising since that is their norm when it comes to Africa.