Home
The man who would be king PDF Print E-mail
Written by Peter Ndiangui   
Friday, 05 October 2007

Kenyans have watched with increasing consternation as Raila Odinga's popularity has surged in the opinion polls, riding on a wave of crowd-pleasing nothingness and incendiary rhetoric.

That the ODM candidate is a superior class of politician, one with his finger right on the pulse of public opinion is unquestionable, but even his most ardent supporters must have their minds dizzy with the extremity of his vacillation and his capacity for wowing crowds with a steady stream of bile and comedy. It is important that a politician win elections but the question must be asked, what is it all for? Is it simply a pursuit for glory? What is the intended consequence of ascension to State House. And for the voting public, what are the consequences of the realization that he almost never means what he says?

raila_edited.jpg
ODM's Raila Odinga

Nowhere in the constancy of rhetoric is there a genuine hint of a well-thought out raft of proposals, or indeed even of the embryonic rumor of an economic policy. But so hungry are the people, and so far removed from the feast at the table that their eyes are transfixed on the messenger and the boom of his voice. Their fickle attentions mesmerized and misdirected to their disadvantage, hearing only what they want to hear and seeing only what they want to see.

Over a steady fifteen years, carried along in no small part by our political immaturity and desire for ruthless, exploitative leadership, Raila has succeeded in creating for himself a brand as the enigmatic whitewasher, the man who can make black white and white, black. In the time since, he has arrogated to himself the name of Messiah, and with the consequent fanatical support, crafted an ability to resurrect the political fortunes of many an ugly politician, and with just as much ease to cast as a demon yesterday's angel. The avenger's sword has visited many a Kenyan politicians' throats, most recently that of Kalonzo Musyoka. A short time before that, it was William Ruto on who the war was waged. With stiff reminders that those with court cases would not be allowed to run for president, and that Sally and Henry Kosgei would be taken up to replace him if he did not comply. Now that he has, those court cases are really nothing but a distant memory.

At the last election, it was Raila's present running mate Musalia Mudavadi who was strung up on charges as the dark force behind Goldenberg, the largest fraud in Kenya's history. Now, however it is Prof. George Saitoti who must take the blame for those crimes as Musalia is made whiter than the snow. President Moi was also propped up in power by the NDP and Raila's energies, not just in the support given against James Orengo's vote of no confidence, but also in the steady buttressing that was supplied to KANU measures in that parliament and in the constitutional efforts of the turn of the century.

musalia.jpg
From demon to angel

The less transported among Raila's supporters try to hide their discomfort by euphemizing his irresolution, or more frankly his deceitful nature, labeling these ‘tactical political moves', strategies aimed at reaching political goals. But even they must be wearied by having to constantly explain his capricious nature, a task that is not made any easier by the ODM's pretensions to the status of ‘reform party.'

Our memories as Kenyans are not the longest, a fact made clearest by the euphoric wave that saw Moi's former Vice President acclaimed as a reformer in 2002, against the better wisdom of such reformists as James Orengo. And that is the big lesson for Kenyans today.

Five years ago, a few weeks before the famous Tosha cry, Raila Odinga was in the media proclaiming the iniquity and unsuitability for national leadership of the NAK coalition. At that time, the LDP, Raila's party had been promoting Prof. George Saitoti as its candidate for the presidency. So it was that some Kenyans were surprised to see him championing Othaya MP Mwai Kibaki, the NAK (DP) candidate as the best possible one, only a few weeks later.

But those who knew the then LDP leader were not at all surprised, especially as the long-time Lang'ata MP has shown pedigree for just such caprice. Only three years earlier, he had through a key-ally Otieno Kajwang, brought to parliament a motion of no confidence against then Vice President Prof. Saitoti citing his involvement in the Goldenberg scandal. This attempt was thwarted only as the GEMA vote in parliament came to the defence of its brother. Still, it did not escape notice that the NDP crowd were even that early on, working with State House to clear the path to the Moi succession, a path in which Saitoti's position as heir-apparent was an obstacle. Raila and the NDP crowd were zealous in their campaigns against Saitoti, vigorously taking the vanguard against an MP from the party they were conducting a ‘cooperation' with. This was the true reason why NDP joined with KANU, and not some altruistic mission into the belly of the beast. In whatever way the old wizard Moi did it, Raila was under the impression that Moi would hand over to him. Here is their plan from Christmas Day 2000. Or as Raila would better explain it, Moi has the girl we are courting.

moi2001.jpg
once a friend and partner

By early 2002, the anti-Saitoti campaign was taken further, when in the Machiavellian coup at Kasarani, Raila and NDP turned the knife in the professor's back, in the process showing off their democratic credentials. But later that year, in a bizarre turn-around following the realization that Moi had no intention of handing the country over to Raila, Saitoti was magically transformed into an angel of light. That sunny Kajiado day, so long gone from the collective memory must still nag at Raila's present beau, former Vice President Musalia Mudavadi, for it was then that he was announced as the chief villain behind Goldenberg.

When the Kroll Report was released recently, it was used as a weapon to bash the government about with, even as only two years ago, with much of that report public knowledge, Raila had castigated the Kibaki government for not leaving former President Moi alone. As late as last week, the indefatigable Lang'ata MP was brandishing his role in protecting Moi against the seizure of his Kabarnet Gardens home, a property that was State property until its appropriation by Moi. Louis Otieno tries to be diplomatic with him in this video here , asking questions about consistency and whether, 'it is Raila that decides who is innocent and who is guilty?' Raila even goes so far as to claim that William Ole Ntimama has never been accused of involvement in any scandal.

It is now the norm that on every issue, rather than provide leadership, the ODM candidate will simply pander to the basest instincts of the crowd he is addressing. His fanatical supporters are carried away by this and see his wavering but constantly extreme sentiments as alloyed to those of the ‘common man'. For the rest of the electorate however, it is important that we wake up to the tragedy we are walking into. Kenyans it is true are a bitter people, having for so long been let down by their government, but for a leader of such national importance to play with their emotions in the way Raila does is dangerous populism, especially as it is never backed with well-thought out solutions or structures. Remember the proposal to bring the Olympics to Kenya? Or to have the economy grow at a 20% clip per year? Remember the allegation that the Nairobi Stock Exchange was growing on the back of drug money ?


The Late Michael Wamalwa

Worryingly also, the ODM leader displays an extremely violent streak, which cannot but be a harbinger of mayhem for Kenya. During his time in KANU, when the Muungano wa Mageuzi of James Orengo and Anyang' Nyong'o among others was agitating for a Wanjiku-led constitutional reform programme, the Lang'ata MP issued what could not have been more explicit orders for a violent disruption of a rally to be held in Kisumu. Remember that these were people merely agitating for reform, the true forces of Kenya's second liberation and not a collection of KANU youth-wingers. To attack the likes of Ooki Ombaka shows that for the NDP- Raila allied groups, there is no conscience in their politics. All that matters is compliance, and obeisance to the Dear Leader.

Yes, this is what Raila gets up to when he is in power. Whether enjoying explicit power in government or implicit power in Nyanza province, the ODM leader does not give an inch, and is not shy about blessing violence. The episodes involving Nazlin Umar in Kisumu are still fresh in the memory, but what of other victims of his intolerance of dissent. Does anyone now remember Edwin Ogonda Osir; does anyone remember Lawrence Akinyi Oile or the violence that imposed Shakeel Shabir as the Mayor of Kisumu? If not then let this report from the Daily Nation of November 2000 serve as a reminder. Last of all spare a thought for the Finance Minister Amos Kimunya, who was at the sharp end of the Lang'ata MP's ire. When the two found themselves sitting on Kibaki's front-bench, Raila subjected Kimunya to a quick sharp jab on the rib with his elbow. The danger here of course is that politicians of other parties and persuasions begin to look weak or irresolute in the eyes of the electorate, and are therefore likely to employ similar tactics whenever they can.


Amos Kimunya

Even when the violence is not physical, it is passionate and just as persuasive. The message as always is quite clear, it is either my way or the highway, and there is no room for dissent. That SDP chairman James Orengo and former Rangwe MP Shem Ochuodho have now complied shows just how coercive the violence may be. In the first days of the new millennium, the two MPs were attacked by a mob so vicious that John Githongo in this report here says the aim appeared to be the murder of the two MPs.

So it is that we find ourselves facing an election with Raila Odinga on the ballot, and in the lead in all opinion polls. How he has got there is no mystery, and to the sins above, I would add the vicious anti-Kikuyu strain in his campaigns. What we find in Raila is a politician who has mastered more than anything a peerless ability to whip up the crowds. But no man has a leash on the consequences that such actions can bring out, especially not when he has shown as stark an intolerance for dissent as has the ODM leader. The consequences of a Raila presidency may well be starker than the polarisation we have suffered under Kibaki's presidency. For a reformist, the ODM leader has very few ideas on how he would rebuild the country, even as his history shows a higher probability that his election to State House will lead to a falling apart of the country.

This is not mere scare-mongering. The one constant strain we can distil from his career of the last 15 years is a clear and uncompromising intolerance. Massive pressure and intimidation are brought to bear on anyone who shows the slightest doubt. William Ruto and even Musalia Mudavadi (who for a brief moment told us of ODM's dictator) have all been brought into line. But some will still try to resist the domination.

No single political pact Raila Odinga has ever been involved in has survived longer than a couple of years. This is the case whether the pact is with a completely different party (for example Moi or Kibaki) or with colleagues who share the same goals as he does (for example the late Kijana Wamalwa, Orengo or Mageuzi). That Raila Odinga has shown himself incapable of change, and an implacable foe of peace demands that we do not vote for him.


Peter Ndiangui
About the author:




Digg!Del.icio.us!Google!Facebook!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Trackback(0)
Comments (59)add
0
Redraft ur first paragraph ple
written by Mzalendo , October 05, 2007
GEMA has watched with increasing consternation as Raila Odinga's popularity has surged in the opinion polls, riding on a wave of "angst at the Kibaki's GEMA Mafia government's insitutionalization of tribalism, comforting of corruption, lack of equitable distribution, insensitivity to the real needs of the masses and a failed infrastructre, healthcare and law-reform programs"

[Edited by Moderator]
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Timothy Wainaina , October 05, 2007
Excellently said. No hysterics, no tribal talk, nothing but the facts, and with links too.
I am going to forward this now, to all the Raila supporters that I know, hopefully the election can still be won and our country saved from chaos.

As an example to all his fanatics, you show that someone can at the same time be opposed to Raila without thinking that Kibaki is perfect. In fact Kibaki has made many mistakes, but Raila would be hell.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Mzalendo , October 05, 2007
[Deleted Comment]
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Chris , October 05, 2007
[Deleted Comment]
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
standards
written by editor , October 05, 2007
Please restrict your comments to the content in the initial article. Write in English, mind your grammar, capitals and spellings. Write your opinion, cheerleading is not tolerated. This is a newspaper, not a web-forum. As much as is possible, every new comment should add something of substance to the discussion.

We are determined to let discussions flow unimpeded, but editors will not tolerate loutish behaviour.
For the uninitiated, here's an example, and another one here.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...Building or Burning Rome
written by Silas , October 05, 2007
That article is very interesting. The various presidential candidates present us with challenges; Kenyan society is in need of transforming from political rhetoric and induced paralysis to collective implementation of workable solutions across the board. I fault Kibaki’s inability to deal decisively with corruption yet I hear Raila intervening voice looming loud on the same.

A slight scan on the political footprint that trail each of the candidates provides us with evidence that in the quest for political fiefdom many abdicated the opportunity to seize upon a people conscious agenda. Though late in the day, Kibaki’s 5 yrs term vindicates him and show cases a leader ready and willing to take on challenges to transform society.

I stand to be correct, there is nothing in Raila active political history that showcases his potential to uplift standards; his stand is steadfastly consistent and does not deviate from the one and only quest: power struggle where his talent is unmatched. We have to wait and see the mystery behind the enigma; whether bringing us the Olympics will form the basis for his legacy is not one we can yet determine because he has no observable achievements outside of the political wrestling arena. No molasses please that is personal.

My humble six senses pre-empts, an overwhelming public regret no soon as we elect Raila as president and wake up to the realisation that crumbling Rome was not build in one day.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
@pndiangui - the speck in anot
written by Newafroguy , October 06, 2007
Am not a journalist or an astute analyst by any measure. But my critique of your review on Raila will base on the premise of objectivity, or its lack thereof. It is amazing how different human beings can look at the same thing but have totally different interpretations of what it means. Worse still, is when second hand and third hand interpretations by others are adpoted as gospel truth. To weed such instances out I believe in the good old pros/cons method.

How different would your analysis have been had you been reviewing President Kibaki? With what emphasis would you have highlighted his past failures (as vp, minister etc) and present (same rhetoric as Raila, condoning corruption and the corrupt, political flip floping and breaking pacts, queit power excesses like the standard raid etc)? Would you have thought him a violent man now that his youth supporters went on rampage a few days ago to protest against the percieved support of the American envoy for Raila?

Without getting too much into such already well known details, my view is that you failed to present a balanced review thus exposing a lack of objectivity that weakens your premise.

While I acknowledge that it is a human tendency to only see the good in the people one supports, and the negative in the opposition, I think that it is incumbent on us to try as much as possible to be rational and objective. At least even acknowledge that he exposed the artur brothers when all of us were calling him names. Balanced and objecive is all I ask, not sycophancy.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Otsiatso , October 06, 2007
Great article! Such thought should be a must in any political science class on Kenyan politics.

You have just described Otto Von Bismarck's politics - this time around Agwambo's detractors must be scratching their collective political heads as to how he can be that popular. It is called realpolitiks my friend, you cut deals and work your way to the top. Remember Michuki's comment that "all we wanted was the presidency" , as he metaphorically pissed all over the MOU, yeah - it is that streak that Tinga has mastered.

The only other person who understands that is Moi. That is why he can incite his people to ethnically cleanse GEMA from R.VAlley and in less than 10 years, he is "holding hands" with Maathai and Wamwere as if nothing happened. Obako does not have such machination, and that is why the PNU seems rudderless.

Tinga is a Kenyan Machiavelli - I am loving it! Oh to be a Kenyan academic political scientist!!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Hold your horses
written by pndiangui , October 06, 2007
Kibaki’s article on the same is on the way. On the same vigor that we have used to put Odinga on Spot, we will apply the same on Kibaki next week.
If it is matters to do with character and competence none of them can claim a higher ground than the other. Competence to manage an economy aside, but lets take a closer look to what is even the most important to Kenyans today; Character; Whose main dimensions of measure is Trustworthiness and Integrity. For those who would want us to by-pass this test and scrutiny on our aspiring leaders, then we will have in office pretty much what populists pushed through our throats in 2002.
But thank you for reminding me of this important task ahead this week.
To start with Kibaki brought to us the Monolithic party democracy that was KANU and he has many more flaws than even the average supporter might be aware of. For now and until we publish Kibaki's article, our eyes are on the populist , sanitizer MP for Langata. Enjoy the debate.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Stephen Wanyama , October 06, 2007
Relax Peter,
There is absolutely no way you will ever satisfy Raila's supporters unless you say like they do that Raila is the Messiah, God Incarnate, Mandela and so on.
Can you see a Raila supporter writing an article such as Stephen Wainaina did here, 'The Man who could not be bothered?' Or do you remember the article I wrote back in April 'Why I will not vote for Kibaki?'. I have not in the whole of the Kenyan media, online or offline ever seen an article by anyone who supports Raila rebuking him in any sense at all. Instead, it's a litany of the most off-putting sentiment Messiah, Mandela, Genius, Mysterious, and so on. At least we know that Kibaki has numerous and serious limitations.
NewAfroGuy
You would need all of five minutes to discover that Peter has been critical of Kibaki in the past. The particular bits about Raila's violent nature seem to me not to speak only of violence in his name, but also violence that he was directly involved in. Do you remember when he boxed Martha Karua?


There's a level of maturity that Kenyan politics will one day have to attain, the absence of which keeps us from progressing as we bind ourselves to crazy emotional outpourings that we will start to regret two nights after the election.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Stupendous article
written by Dan , October 06, 2007
This is the most brilliant article I've seen on this site. If only the media was as anal in scrutinizing this guy. I was amazed the other day when this Raila supporter vehemently denied that Raila served as a minister under moi. Now that the campaigns are here, it is important this message is passed around and stall Kenya from heading into Mobutu seseseko's Zaire.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by emmo opoti , October 06, 2007
Speaking of Maximillian I, Holy Roman Emperor, Machiavelli wrote

One prince of the present time, whom it is not well to name, never preaches anything else but peace and good faith, and to both he is most hostile, and either, if he had kept it, would have deprived him of reputation and kingdom many a time.

A translation is available in L Kitazi's article on violence and blowback.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Tim Norwood , October 06, 2007
Perhaps better put, considering the provenance of the title of the article, the endless cycle of self-harm and the alienation of the voter would be the quip from would be this one from Kipling,

And the burnt fool's bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the fire.


Fine, fine effort Peter. Your name curses you however. Sad for us, that there are those who believe it connotes a congenital attachment to Kibaki. I want to commend you for those links, the proof that Raila is a very risky investment is incontrovertible.

NewAfro,
Care to counter the specific issues raised in the article? Let's try this, maybe you write an article on Raila, and another on Kibaki. And we compare them to Peter's? Not likely, huh?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Tim
written by Newafroguy , October 06, 2007
I think many people are missing the gist of the matter in these debates. I did not at all intend to counter P's claims because many are self evident. On the other hand, I disagree with impressions that make Kibaki look good because others look bad.

If you read my comment I merely wondered why similar if not worse faults on the part of Kibaki are passed as "mistakes" etc. What got me was the implied double standards and not the need to disprove his claims.

For the record, being opposed to Kibaki presidency doesn't automatically one a Raila supporter. I thus find your insinuations of comparing article from me and Pndiangui about both candidates unnecessary.

I think maturity grants that we should be able to debate sincerely and honestly about such important issues without childish competition. I look forward to the Kibaki article.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Stephen Wainaina , October 06, 2007
One at a time, one at a time. Good work, Ndiangui. I was mulling over doing such an article myself. I am sure that as we go into the campaign period a lot of this will become public information and the Special One's lead will slide even further. Can Waititu be paid to continue showing opinion polls that give ODM a ten point advantage? Weren't nothing so harmful as hubris.

---
Meanwhile, I have never liked Raila, but some of those newspaper links were eye opening in their force. I had quite forgotten the attacks on the likes of Oki Ombaka, Shem Ochuodho and James Orengo. Had also forgotten about the little incident with Kimunya, and the one Wanyama is talking about boxing poor Martha! Are these pictures available, those headlines must be made full use of. Also the ones of Ruto beating Chesire up at State House.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Marangu , October 06, 2007
I am with Newafroguy on this one, if Peter has managed to get one message through, it is Raila is undeserving of our vote, my question is then who is? Oh and now it is not even Kibaki, because in a week, you will unleash what you cannot tell us this week about him. So who are you batting for here Peter?. Your article is brilliantry written and like many I think it casts Kibaki in good light compared to Raila. My hope is that you will not wait untill the day after elections to tell us about Kibaki's flaws.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
self-hating Luo
written by Ruath Man , October 06, 2007
Are you the same emmo opoti who wrote this article here? What do you have against the leaders of Nyanza? Have you ever written anything in praise of Raila Odinga? Or do you hate all the politicians? Why don't you stand then?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Timothy Wainaina , October 06, 2007
The article is very balanced.
Our memories as Kenyans are not the longest, a fact made clearest by the euphoric wave that saw Moi's former Vice President acclaimed as a reformer in 2002, against the better wisdom of such reformists as James Orengo. And that is the big lesson for Kenyans today.


This is extremely balanced Ndiangui do not be bullied. If they want to read an anti-Kibaki one they can look them up in the archives. Is there no freedom of speech? Have you ever seen an article by any of the Raila -men on another candidate that is even half as objective?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by emmo opoti , October 06, 2007
I have read through this article again to try and understand what the drama is about. The article is about the ODM candidate Raila Odinga. It is not about Mwai Kibaki or Daniel Moi or Nelson Mandela. Its objectivity is established by its being based on incontrovertible facts. Stephen Wanyama has published two links in his comment that show previous article that were anti-Kibaki. In neither of them did we see this barrage of comments insulting the author and demanding that he writes about Kibaki.

I think Tim's suggestion is very valid. Why don't those who want anti-Kibaki articles do us a favour and write some?

NewAfroGuy,
Karibu, long time no see. I cannot see anywhere in the article where Ndiangui writes in defense of Kibaki or indeed glosses over Kibaki's mistakes. The only mentions are,
Raila had castigated the Kibaki government for not leaving former President Moi alone

This to me suggests that the writer is wondering why it is alright for Raila to shelter Moi, but wrong for Kibaki not to act on the Kroll Report. The writer does not give us his view on the virtue of either action.

The second instance is this one here.
The consequences of a Raila presidency may well be starker than the polarisation we have suffered under Kibaki's presidency.

This time the context confesses disapproval of the polarisation the Kibaki presidency has imposed on Kenya. But the writer adds that he thinks this polarisation will be even more profound under a Raila government.

That I think is fair enough. Everyone is free to write an article, and in the interests of free speech, to write it as they choose, bounded only by the rules of common decency and grammar.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
@pndiangui
written by Rabet Maatari , October 06, 2007
You have stated on another thread that you do not like Raila much as such i will treat this article with a pinch od salt it deserves.

But come January 2008, watch so that you don'y get multiple heart attacks when Kenya ushers in a new era in the form of an ODM government.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
facts not fiction
written by Tim Norwood , October 06, 2007
Oh and now it is not even Kibaki, because in a week, you will unleash what you cannot tell us this week about him. So who are you batting for here Peter?. Your article is brilliantry written and like many I think it casts Kibaki in good light compared to Raila. My hope is that you will not wait untill the day after elections to tell us about Kibaki's flaws.


This is most unfair! Is Ndiangui a civil servant? Why are we waiting for him to write an article about Kibaki? Ndiangui are you getting paid so people can demand things of you?
And does everyone have to declare what candidate they are supporting? What if they are not supporting any candidate? In the days of one-party rule, did it then follow that we all had to vote for Moi/Kenyatta?
I do not mean to be insulting here, but it seems to me that supporters of Raila are simply intent on opposing and imposing, never engaging. Like other writers have said, I believe Ndiangui has given a most fair account.

RabetMaatari,
It has little to do with what Ndiangui likes or not. See all those links, this article is based on a little something called history. Try click on them.

That is why the writers on this site stand out for me, they write unemotional fact based opinion pieces. No rants, no petty hates, its all back with facts. Facts are sacred. Neutrality is a virtue.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Otsiatso , October 06, 2007
Tinga followers, no need to get all worked up about brilliant poltical analysis, as much i disagree with the underlying theme. This is flat out good writing.

The question that we should ask is: so what does it all mean. It seems to me to Tinga's detractors - this shows that he does not deserve to even sneeze around the big seat of State House. But irony of ironies it is exactly these machinations and deal cutting that has built the enigma that is Agwambo among the eyes of his fanatical followers.

The major flaw in the analysis is that it starts 15 years ago. Tinga's political teeth, if you care to read his memoirs, were cut long before then. His political history of being the longest serving political prisoner in Kenya, his agitation for change are not not lost on
on his followers.

The bottom line is that in Kenyan politics if you can NOT use such Machiavellian tactics for the big seat - umeisha. I do not see it as a negative thing - I see it as a necessary political survival skill and Agwambo has mastered it. Does he deserve to be the president? Absolutely!! He did not get to where he did by playing meek, he earned it by scheeming. He outmanouvered akina Kalonzo and now thanks to teh bumbling of the PNU - Kibaki.
You go Tinga!!
[Edited by Moderator]
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Avoid group think
written by newafroguy , October 06, 2007
I think a well researched and incisive article like this one deserves a critical review and feedback. We should be able to let the/our ideas freely disagree without getting personal.

Unfortunately, some of us percieve healthy debate as "attacks" or "bullying" or try to make a verbal fight out of it.

Let us avoid pompousness and rise above the very pettiness we castigate in our politicians such as name calling. Diversty of ideas is a good thing for when the best ideas win all of us Kenyans stand to benefit.

I hope this conversation reverts to the topic at hand instead of people trying to prove something about themselves. This is about our beloved Kenya and not any one individual. My pesa nane.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Plain truths
written by pndiangui , October 07, 2007
Emmo , Tim , Wainana

Thankyou for your insightful comments based on objectivity without any emotional colour. Kenya needs you most at this decision time.

Rabet
The euphoria of 2002 is back and none-else is heading the euphoric movement but the sanitizer who if I base this statement on the facts up there it might as well be right to say he doesnt stand for anything.
Many will join him in his undisputed win in this years' elections. Some will even play sychophanism with him like Ngilu. But deep inside they know Raila's character or they choose to conviniently forget because the prizes at stake are mouth-watering and they dont have the resources to got get them. I choose to remind them here and also let other fellow Kenyans reflect on the character of the leaders whom they want to be governed by. The principle of those consequences that befall Kenyans by conveniently disregarding the past behaviours of their leaders will operate regardless.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Nice Work
written by Obamab , October 07, 2007
The article is well thought out, although we can all take it with a pinch of salt, as stated above. the reality of the matter is Raila is responsible for the things outlined, thank you peter for putting it all in one place... like i have heard before, it gives credence to the 'I'm not voting for Raila'.
the debate on the article is annoying to say the least, why are we pointing out the authors bias or the what has been insinuated by the article, we have not seen anything that challenges the thoughts outlined, which gives credence to the article. there are the like of Otsiatso who are sycophantic and will not argue the merits of their cases... but beyond that this was a good read kudos peter
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Kalonzo
written by Seline , October 07, 2007
Since when did being anti- Kibaki mean pro- Raila and being anti Raila mean pro -Kibaki.What happened to kalonzo Musyoka? And what about those who sit on the fence? Branding someone pro-kibaki/Raila without knowing the candidate he/she is going to vote for, and making conclusions about people based on these facts is the most unfair of deeds.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Bashir Jama , October 07, 2007
It is interesting that some people are reserving all manner of accolades for a piece of article that hides vainly huge undertones of dislike for this man Raila while pretending to maintain some facade of objectiveness. I will try to present a dispassionate reply to the innuendoes and character assassination that seems to be the hallmark of Peter’s article. And do not be that fast to accuse me of siding with a tribesman, I indeed come from the desert dunes of the North...
Peter says that Kenyans have “watched with increasing consternation” as Raila’s popularity surges ahead of his 2 main rivals. I ask: which Kenyans? Kenyans in the six provinces where Raila is ahead of the pack (Nairobi, NEP, Coast, Rift Valley, Nyanza and Western) are probably not the ones Peter has in mind. Or are they the ones engaging in this interesting monologue on why they are voting the way they are doing now? Voting for a man who spent nine (9) years in detention for just saying that Kenya’s democratic space be expanded when Kibaki was busy saying that “you can never cut a Mugumo tree with a razor blade... And the man who detained him is now saying the best man for the job is Kibaki. He knows of course that it is business as usual with Kibaki (corruption taken to new levels where some shady people in government took just two years or so to ferret out KSh 15 Billion in Anglo Leasing; tribalism taken to greater heights never seen before; the complete breakdown of infrastructure in most parts of the country, trying travelling to Rift Valley or Western or on Thika Road; shady investors allowed to run amok in Nairobi with GK-plated cars and Police titles and guns)...
He pulls crowd with a steady stream of “bile and comedy.” I may agree with comedy, but “Bile?” Please give us an example of the bile nature of the stream from his mouth. I haven’t heard any, and I am in Nairobi... But I have heard the bile from Mwakwere, Mungatana, Ndile (all extremely shady characters).
You say “he never means what he says.” Are you by any chance referring here to Kibaki, the one whose word is not worth the paper it is written on? Or to Matere Keriri, the very one who revealed that they signed an MoU that they never intended to keep? Or the one who revealed that they never intended to do anything meaningful other than getting rid of Kibaki?
He waged a war on Kalonzo? Ruto? I thought there were political differences only... Hasn’t Kibaki waged wars on the rebel brigands in power? And on Kenyans, whom he likened to chicken droppings? And, even more poignantly for me, on his own luckless driver who was called ‘pumbavu’ on prime time TV in Limuru for an act of considerate favour to his ingrate boss...
Oh, Orengo could not make it to Parliament because of his party? What about Kamotho? And has Central Kenya ever voted for someone not from that province? Will they ever?
In case you have what some called selective amnesia even charade that Kibaki appointed to settle scores with Moi et al, the so-called Bosire Commission, delivered a verdict that cleared Musalia of all blame. Musalia was then Finance minister, in an era where at least Moi ensured that the Finance minister need not be a homeboy (Can you think of a Kalenjin Finance Minister? I can’t).
Yes, the economy is growing at 6% ... or so the mandarins at Treasury claim. Of course they themselves told us that they changed the methods of calculating the GNP per capita to some other model. And 60% of Nairobians continue to live in slums, even as UNDP’s annual Human Development Index shows that Kenya has moved 20 places down in the global HDI ranking. From the time they came the month-on-month cost of living index has been increasing that such today 1kg sugar is KSh 150, while it was 40 in 2002. Everything has gone up. And while farmers in Central Kenya and parts of the Rift Valley are getting better deals those in the forgotten frontier NEP have only seen retribution in form of rendition to Guantanamo and hellish Ethiopian concentration camps. And Kenyans are watching “with increasing consternation” as Raila’s popularity surges ahead. Why should we vote for those who called us “refugees”? If she was slapped (a highly doubtful charge, considering the temperamental comportment of this woman) I am sure Raila would have rotten in jail, given her vindictiveness.
His pacts don’t last more than a couple of years. Kibaki’s didn’t even last a week. Two or three days after he was elected he trashed the document on whose strength he came to power.
In conclusion it would be difficult to vote in a man whose government presided over the greatest rape of the economy. We were advised that they now have a Roads budget that is three times what Moi’s government had. And how do they use this money? In constructing a Ksh 110million per kilometres “roads” that don’t last three months (remember Mombasa). We are right in getting rid of these fellows, we have had enough.
In my province, projections indicate Raila has 70% of the total vote. We have only 300,000 votes, but we shall give most of them to the man who has suffered for us. And we shall deny 25% to the man who ensured that the Kuwaitis who came with US$300 million to construct the Garissa-Mandera road were sent away because the road is not important, even after Kibaki’s clique was offered a 10-year grace period and interest-free loan repayment. We don’t need Kibaki anymore, it was a big mistake in the first place.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by a guest , October 07, 2007
[Comment deleted by Moderator]
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
end tribalism
written by new day , October 07, 2007
Deceitful nature; capricious nature; turning the knife; extreme sentiments; extremely violent streak; intolerant of dissent; incapable of change; implacable foe of peace. Peter Ndiangui finishes by writing 'this is not scare-mongering', like he suddenly realizes exactly the picture that his article is likely to portray just as he enters the last paragraph.

I have been walking in the Kenyan streets just listening to people speak and most people from Mount Kenya region would have written exactly like Peter or even add three or more pages of expressions with similar content. I enter the shop at the corner owned by Mr. Githinji and silent anger falls in the room as I am judged based on my dark luo-like look (even if I may not be from that community per chance). It is called veiled tribalism; one community which has had two presidents from its home province faced by the prospects of change.

What if Kibaki tena campaign sails through and Kibaki remains in office, business as usual until 2012 then we shall have to deal with 'Uhuru sasa'. If Raila losses, he wil have taught one unforgettable lesson to mount kenya communities that believe they are the only ones worthy of kenyan leadership and that other comunities branded as violent, awkward and lazy can also compete and bring the change that we all seem to want. If he wins, he will be judged by his term in office (not imagination crafted on the basis of fear). If he brings a poor record, we will look for a better leader in 2012. This is not experimenting, it is the hard search that we must all endure as Kenyans to be ble to get real results. Otherwise Kibaki and the track record for development being used to re-sell him is a drop in the ocean compared to this country's potential, largely ignored or stereotyped due to fear of change, bad intentions towards other communities and ethnic complacency. If Raila was a dictator, violence-oriented,untrustworthy etc he would not be seeking office democratically as he is doing. Our mount Kenya brothers (where i was born) need to go on a retreat and look at themselves with fresh eyes, as part of a Kenyan community (now moving towards the East African Community) and not an isolated people who treat others with contempt in their quest for dominance. The Referendum brought out this attitude clearly and now it looks like the elections are going to confirm it, as other communties have realized that they can work together with leaders from Nyanza, in harmony and understanding. Thank you.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Lets get deeper
written by pndiangui , October 07, 2007
Bashir

Thankyou very much for your insightful comments. You really did a great job. Mind you , this not about assisnating anyone's character this about a critical assessment of the character of Raila Odinga that is evident from the way he has behaved for the last few years. Our character is not assessed by what we say but what we do and this is manifested by the behaviour patterns on a day to day basis.
First let me not undermine any of your statements but man relegating my voting pattern as one determined by my place of birth and making it thus seem that I can only think that if for example I supported Kibaki (Which I don’t and I have stated on this very site my distaste for his leadership if he has any) it cannot be a matter of principle but only through tribal inclinations, is itself a bad mentality. That you only need to look at my name and assume I am flying PNU flag, is itself a relatively cynical way of thinking.

Now lets try to create something new than either of us proposed both from your insights and mine;

First I want to dispel one big fallacy; That because Raila went to detention he is now meets some key requirements of being made the president. Shall we do the same to Koigi Wamwere then? Did Kenyatta make a good president because he 'suffered' the same? Didnt we see detentions without trial by the same very man who opposed colonialists for over 30 years?

My point? That the actions come second to the motives. That the motives (motivation of coming hard against the british empire) of Kenyatta were about Power and not about the people of Kenya is what lead us to that very hole. Thats exactly what the 1982 coups , the Mwakenyas or other 'opposition' to the regimes were about for Raila. And this is well demonstrated by the latter’s behaviors by trying to talk himself out of behaviors he himself behaves into; Hence the duplicity , the hypocrisy that goes well covered by the populist utterances. And mind you the same would have been with the populous Matiba.

I wont discuss anything on the economic growth here, (Neither has PNU nor ODM shown clear and well-thought out strategies of going about it) but remember the man who changed the calculations of GDP per capita is now ODM's key architect. Infact when some of the ODM's members , the likes of Ruto with pending corrupt court cases talk about economic policy, it sounds too foreign to their followers and themselves too just like it does when PNU's Murungaru , talks about 'Kibaki's achievements'.

This is about Raila's Character. An article on Raila's Economic management credentials and competencies is on the way for a man who thinks NSE is ran on drug money and one who states unshaken that in 2008 if he's elected into power Kenya's economy will be growing at more than 20% (straight from his mouth when he visited Karatina).

But yes I totally agree with you that Kibaki is as untrustworthy as the fellow I committed this space for. And that's why those who pushed him down the throats of Kenyans in 2002 and they very well new his credentials of a conformist, stink of the same populist ideals but since it wasn’t about Kenyans but the cutting of power deals in the back-door and a total lack of principle-based leadership, this is what we are left with.

New day
Great and insightful comments. If I would tell you what I have had to go through in re-looking at Raila you would be surprised. I have even had to defend the MP for Langata amongst people from Central Kenya (Where I also come from) who see nothing in him but the lense they use to assess him is what I have had a problem with. And I think its this prism that you think I am seeing him through. The backward stereotyping incarnated into the minds of central Kenyans by a Kenyatta presidency that wanted to be protected in its looting ways by the populous GEMA vote.
I kind of hesitated to put Raila on spot this way because I knew the ugly face of tribalism would be tagged on me because of my name as Bashir has demonstrated above but again I felt I needed to let this one out for what it is and based on evidence up there. If it fails to meet your objectivity test please let me know where. What I am saying is that Raila and Kibaki belong to the same boat ; that they have no business touting any change for Kenyans because they really dont mean it. I am just putting their integrity on the line.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
great article
written by joe , October 08, 2007
great article - i personally im resigned to raila presidency i have no particular love for the man nor the myth.

Though my particular concern is the bomas draft which i personally think is one of the worst constitutions ever written. and how it will be instituted in 6 months ....how ?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
too late
written by Jayawardene , October 08, 2007
A brilliant article by Ndiangui. It is even more so because he has not let the hanging threat of a charge of tribalism distract him from the task at hand.
The claims and counter claims and charges of bias against one or other candidate are a smokescreen.

I think that the call to end tribalism by the author New Day is the most significant response to the article by Peter.

My pal walked into a barber's shop in Barking, east London just the other day. The staff and patrons were all engaged in heated speculation on Kenya politics, just as guys do here. They were all speaking in the 'mount kenyan kiswahili' You know the drill.... Kanu Iko nawenyewe type of grammar.

When the tall well-built man entered they immediately assumed he was from the Lake basin and switched over to their vernacular. Some pretty rude words were said about my pal, his kinsmen and Agwambo and how they wanted to steal 'our' seat before he greeted them in their tongue.

I wouldn't vote for the PNU even if you paid me
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Somewhat molified...
written by Bashir Jama , October 08, 2007
Hello Peter,
Sorry if I sounded like I was rounding on you because of your name (believe me, I had no idea where you come from, it is really secondary to me because your article was really well written, even if I didn't agree with the message).
Today's dailies were awash with news of Raila's supremacy in the ratings again, as Kibaki's dip. He is most popular among the youthful, who feel completely left out in Kibaki's administration.
Politics is not really my forte (I am a struggling businessman) but I have seen the kind of damage done to Kenya by both the structure and policies of KRA and the shameful profligacy of a government bent on paupering Kenyans. I travelled on Nairobi-Nakuru road and my brother I am telling you there is no 80km-road in this world that should take so long to build (2 years now) and subject loyal taxpaying citizens to the misery I saw and personally witnessed. It is the greatest shame that corruption has been allowed to fester like this. Try going anywhere out of your house and you are most likely to be shaken by an extortionist policeman and (increasinly) policewoman.
When the final critique of Kibaki is written in history he will go down as the man who scuppered astounding goodwill at the altar of myopic expediencies.
Cheers Peter and all.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Other examples
written by Bashir Jama , October 08, 2007
I failed to mention that Kibaki's development record is a mirage. Our neighbours economies are growing at higher rates than us. Mozambique, which just came out of a debilitating civil war, is clocking 18%, close by is wartorn Angola.
We did not elect Kibaki to tell us that (sic) we are doing 6% growth. We wanted growth and development, but alas...
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
reading political texts
written by Otsiatso , October 08, 2007
The merits of the article are well debated , not counting the name calling - I am not sure whether Obamab has read all of them. My point is that - text can be read in multiple ways. One way is to see the article as character assasination, but I do not see it that way. Ndiangui is attemptng to tie character analysis and actions [quite a task], in a predictive way [ which is even a more challenging task].
For me what I see is an analysis of the necessary skills to survive Kenyan politics and to make it to the top. Just a few months ago the thought among the so called pundits was that Tinga was enelectable, right now that is not the issue. How did he do it? The answer is partly found in the character analysis Ndiangui has written. Tinga can scheme with the best - just ask Kalonzo.
Raila notes that one of his political heroes is Otto Von Bismarck, of the "end justfies the means" philosophy.

As for detention history, it is not that one has been there that counts it is the history after coming out and Wamwere does not even come close, Kenyatta had the people's goodwill but lost it for reasons to many to go into. Yet, JM had what it took to use his detention as a way of getting a following and not forgetting the people he suffered with and the poor masses . Kenyans loved him for that - he was the only MP from Central province to attend Mboya's funeral. Detention counts for something if it is part of one's persona as a relating point. Tinga has that.

I am bemused at how vigorously people are denying they do not support Raila or Kibaki. As for Obamab labelling of sycophancy, thank you and I will not besmirch this debate by starting a thread on insults that I expect on Mashada.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Lets keep things in perspectiv
written by Vlad , October 08, 2007
Bashir,

You say "Mozambique, which just came out of a debilitating civil war, is clocking 18%, close by is war torn Angola."

Well, if you went back and checked, you'll find that a single aluminum smelting plant investment (>$1b) pushed Mozambique's GDP a huge bit. And oil as we know does wonders. It is not easy to grow an economy like Kenya's which is based on agriculture and services - the most fickle of industries. Expecting agriculture, or tourism or even IT to grow the GDP 20% p.a. within the next 5yrs is indulging in fantasy.

Further, growth rate is relative to previous statistics; if Somalia crept out of its chaos, it could register a growth rate of a couple hundred %.

Vlad
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by emmo opoti , October 08, 2007
Jayawardene
I have read that comment of yours elsewhere. Is it a bit of scaremongering? I once had a very dark Kikuyu girl-friend from Nyeri. The President himself is not too light-skinned. Even if we accept your account as truth, it is hardly a reason to decide your vote is it?
One of the greatest vote gathering plays the ODM has on offer is the anti-GEMA strain. The anything but the Agikuyu politics.

Peter,
I hope more people can see your point about detention and suitability for office. The greatest example of the point you are making is the Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Measure for measure
written by Newafroguy , October 09, 2007
One way is to see the article as character assasination, but I do not see it that way. Ndiangui is attemptng to tie character analysis and actions [quite a task], in a predictive way


Otsiatso's comments bring out a good persepective from which to understand Ndiangui's article. Perhaps what Ndiangui didn't do or maybe didn't want to do was to create a sense of scale upon which to measure the relative weight of the accusations brought forth.

In other words, fine Raila may be guilty of all that but just how serious are those "crimes" and compared to whom or what do we establish such seriousness since the author concludes that we not vote for Raila well against a background of other candidates.

So if one thief robs oranges and beats people up in Lodwar and another robs bananas and beats people up in Magadi, shall we judge them based on the counts of the events, location of events, quantities stollen, description of items stollen, or what?

I guess this is the catch 22 scenario of which among the characters for presidency has the lesser evil. That seems to be the way this discussion went anyway.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
end tribalism
written by new day , October 11, 2007
Quoting Emmo Opoti: One of the greatest vote gathering plays the ODM has on offer is the anti-GEMA strain. The anything but Agikuyu politics.

This is true and accurate. Suddenly, strange bed-fellows are presently flying the ODM flag, citing new-found love and cooperation. This also explains some of the sudden defections that have taken place, as if the defectors had been all along resisting stiff pressure but finally balking. Even Uhuru's bid to support Kibaki was due to strong ethnic pressure especially in the wake of a threat that initially seemed minor and easily squashed by one word 'unelectable'. Now it seems like communities that would ordinarily field their 'sons' for president have little choice but support someone from 'the other side' but with less fear to inspire. This word fear is a strong factor in this election. My concern is violence: we should not shed anyone's bloods in the name of expressing opinions (it can't happen here on the net, but think about the streets and alleys where these things are known to happen).

Light touch: We should spare a moment and think about one Kalonzo Musyoka who despite poor poll ratings and cartoons designed to poke fun at his presidential ambitions, has stuck to his guns and still reminds us that come 2008, he will be receiving guests at state house and thanking all those who turned up in large numbers to vote for him in a 'historic poll'. Is this not real determination and a sign of a strong leader that we are all side-stepping? Good day
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
What Kenyans are these?
written by Man R , October 12, 2007
Kenyans have watched with increasing consternation as Raila Odinga's popularity has surged in the opinion polls, riding on a wave of crowd-pleasing nothingness and incendiary rhetoric.


Peter,

I can tell it's been long since you went home. I suggest a one month tour to Kenya and let's talk after that. Kenyans are not "watching with increasing consternation," at Raila surge in popularity, they're the ones making him the most popular and credible candidate in the race now.

You have pointed out, with a lot of exaggeration, the flaws in Raila but ignored his strengths and contribution to the democratic space we enjoy in Kenya today. You argument, which has been ripped apart by Bashir Jama, is a typical one used by Kibaki's sympathizers who are not ready to face the truth that Kibaki's has been an era of incompetence and mediocrity that falls way short to the expectation and goodwill we granted him in 2002.

Your suggestion that we should keep Kibaki because of myriad reasons like a debatable 6 percent economic growth and uneasy stability he has presided over is just ludicrous.

Kibaki has failed Kenyans every step of his presidency, he started off by breaking the MoU you seem to wave away like trash. Do you honestly think all those politicians would have rallied behind Kibaki had he not signed the MoU? If you think so then you need to stop thinking, because that's a severe waste of thought and thinking process.

I don't need to go over the fallacies and double standards in your main argument because I doubt I'd do a better job than Bashir, but I have to ask you to stop feigning objectivity while writing such slanted pieces.

I support Raila because I believe he's a true leader, a democrat, a person who has sacrificed for our nation and a true champion of the down-trodden. I would never write a piece pretending to give Kibaki a fair shake because my mind is already made up that he's an incompetent, lazy and deceitful man.

Kenya needs to rid itself from Kibaki's mediocrity propped by your variety of misguided individuals.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Strategy, strategy...
written by Bashir Jama , October 12, 2007
Vlad,
You say that only one plant or establishment responsible for the spike in Mozambican miracle. The obvious question would be: why not us? Of course, the answer is strategy, my dear Watson. You see, we elected leaders totally incapable of visualising anything other than old fashioned economic growth models. You may remember that the Kenya Army at one time was importing corned beef from Botswana (pop: about 2 million or so, I guess). And where did they learn about livestock production? You guessed it right, Kenya.
Why should this government and Mr Kibaki expect votes from, eg, NEP when he vetoed an all important road project from Garissa-Mandera (700kms road, pure hell now if you ask me), when he decided to do absolutely nothing about what really matters to now (freeing the business environment in NEP from oppressive state control)?
And on economic growth... What do the Asian Tigers have other than good leaders? Do they have oil? Do they even have tea? Coffee?
Cheers...
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Stephen Wanyama , October 12, 2007
But yes I totally agree with you that Kibaki is as untrustworthy as the fellow I committed this space for. And that's why those who pushed him down the throats of Kenyans in 2002 and they very well new his credentials of a conformist, stink of the same populist ideals but since it wasn?t about Kenyans but the cutting of power deals in the back-door and a total lack of principle-based leadership, this is what we are left with.


Bashir and Man R too,
When will Kenyans grow up? Is it at all possible that we can see the massive massive charcater deficiencies in Raila even as we see them in Kibaki too? Why do you have to adore Raila? Is that no extremely naive, and even childish?
If we were having this conversation in 2002, is it not just impassioned people like yourselves who would be carried away with the spirit of Unbwogability, electing Kibaki to hurt Moi?

Has it not occurred to you yet that Raila is a tyrranical thief? How did he come by his billions? Let's study this sentence here.
Raila and Kibaki are thieves.
Neither Kibaki nor Raila care about Kenyans. Neither Kibaki nor Raila have the ideas or personality to bring about economic progress.
Can you bring yourself to say that or are we high school cheerleaders now? Blind to reality?

Bashir's asseveration that leadership is what wrought the Asian Tiger's shows us just how misled he is, and why all those brave souls chanting Agwambo will be as disappointed in two years as they were with Kibaki. Leaders don't change anyhting, they make it possible for things to happen, they allow systems to work unimpeded, they facilitate freedoms and foster the environments where investment and innovation are rewarded.

Raila Odinga does not have it in him to do this. As an entrepreneur I must say that I am perhaps a biased party in all of this, but I know for sure that the environment that enables start-ups will be irredeemably wrecked by Raila and his constant interfering with the jobs and duties of his ministers, his crusade for Gross National Happiness will be the destruction of our country. The time for powerful centralising leaders is in the past.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Which Kenyans?
written by edowino , October 12, 2007
I have little time for people who arrogate themselves the authority of speaking on behalf of Kenyans. Are the people supporting Raila any lesser Kenyans?? Are they aliens??
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
switch on brain
written by Stephen Wanyama , October 12, 2007
Kenya needs to rid itself from Kibaki's mediocrity propped by your variety of misguided individuals.

Man R,
Let's play a game. Let's pretend that we take you seriously. Let's consider each of your points.
You have pointed out, with a lot of exaggeration, the flaws in Raila but ignored his strengths

Where is the exaggeration? Please point it out.
ripped apart by Bashir Jama

I see no such ripping apart. Peter is a Kibaki supporter? How did you come to that conclusion? Did his name give it away?
Your suggestion that we should keep Kibaki because of myriad reasons like a debatable 6 percent economic growth and uneasy stability he has presided over is just ludicrous.
Does Raila have night-schools, or a debating pamphlet where you are taught these skills. Peter does not laud any economic growth from Kibaki at all. The article is entirely about Raila Odinga, his penchant for violence, his intolerance of dissent, his absence from the realms of ration and his cetralising dictatorial ways. Not about Kibaki, who Peter agrees has failed in delivering change.
Where are the double standards in Peter's article? Is it not Raila and people like yourself that are exhibiting these double standards? How again is the article slanted? It is a collection, like a few pages from the Big Black Book of your Messiah. That is all.

a true champion of the down-trodden
What causes people to be downtrodden? Poverty, poor service delivery and injustice in the state system, no? Now this I find very interesting. Please point out, in the long career of Raila Odinga MP a single measure he has brought into parliament that has done anything substantial for the downtrodden. What Raila wants is to be a master of all that he surveys. More power to you and him on your mission.

P.S. Raila would not know democracy if she was riding his back. Read the article again, whether in KANU, NDP, FORD-K, LDP, NARC or ODM, Raila has only ever had one creed. My way, or the highway.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Stephen Wanyama , October 12, 2007
Owino,
Let's see you criticise Raila for something. Let's start there. I have nowhere said anything specific to Raila's supporters. All Kenyans need to grow up, including those who think Kibaki can do no wrong, and those like you who take every criticism of Raila personally.
You and people like you are destroying Kenya. Slavish devotion to anyone is harmful, no matter how kindly disposed that person is. I would like to have a decent, grown-up conversation with a single Raila-phile. Just one.
I have never met them though. They must have migrated someplace.

arrogate themselves the authority of speaking on behalf of Kenyans

Sorry, no. I do not speak for Kenyans. Now, please answer a single charge from the writer's article. A single one?

P.S. I suppose you may have been speaking with reference to the article. The opening line is a mere rhetorical device. It is not meant literally. Why don't you relax?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
nurture positive thoughts
written by new day , October 12, 2007
For me it is clear beyond much doubt that a good majority of voters in the coming elections have given tribal equations at least 90% space in their considerations (potential, experience, capacity, the public view of candidate and such). This can be seen in the good vs evil way of discussions arising here. If someone says s/he will prefer to vote for xx and not yy, and gives reasons and what yy SHOULD DO to get their vote next time, it becomes clear that the presidential candidate is being judged by his or her actions and not what he looks like of where he comes from.

Most discussions verbal or written, here and elsewhere, increasingly show the fatalistic and pessimistic kind of bias that imply that no matter what the subject does they could never get the person judging them to vote for them. At the end of the day it only shows that both candidates have weaknesses, but who in this world is righteous?

Therefore, let us try to take our debates a level higher by presenting a balanced view based on real Kenyan challenges we would want these potential presidents to address. Otherwise, venting emotion and cursing those we do not like does not address the issues, and at the end of the day leaves some defeated since only one will win the election.

So to make it a win-win situation, stop focusing on Kibaki because he is a kikuyu and you are a luo, for example. This was you are doing him an injustice by overlooking all his universal capabilities.

To finish in yet another pessimistic style, i must say that I am increasingly disapointed by the young generation most of whom are actively contributing to this thread, because my hopes that Kiswahili would one day unite this generation are being cruelly trashed and damped with every waking hour. Kumbe Mtoto wa nyoka ni nyoka.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re: nurture positive thoughts
written by Don , October 12, 2007
I have tried in vain to preach a similar message here. It appears most people are contented with over-analyzing but zero ideas. When someone trashes all the leading candidates, but doesn't propose an alternative, it makes me wonder what are Kenyans supposed to do, kill them? I concur with you that a righteous politician or human being is like a needle in a haystack. The search of such a persona is a futile undertaking. I'd be more interested in discussions about the "if" then "what" and "how" to dos, were one of the candidates to be elected. Mere mournings about the past is a waste of human resources. In short, let's be the change we want.
Most discussions verbal or written, here and elsewhere, increasingly show the fatalistic and pessimistic kind of bias that imply that no matter what the subject does they could never get the person judging them to vote for them. At the end of the day it only shows that both candidates have weaknesses, but who in this world is righteous?

Therefore, let us try to take our debates a level higher by presenting a balanced view based on real Kenyan challenges we would want these potential presidents to address. Otherwise, venting emotion and cursing those we do not like does not address the issues, and at the end of the day leaves some defeated since only one will win the election.

So to make it a win-win situation, stop focusing on Kibaki because he is a kikuyu and you are a luo, for example. This was you are doing him an injustice by overlooking all his universal capabilities.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re: Strategy, strategy...
written by Vlad , October 13, 2007
Vlad,
You say that only one plant or establishment responsible for the spike in Mozambican miracle. The obvious question would be: why not us?

Bashir,
Err, ... on your point above, we may not do so because we need to first find aluminium (or oil) in our piece of crust . If we cannot find any, we'll need enterprising people who can help us get somewhere.
You talk of the Asian tigers - if you checked, you'll find that S. Korea's growth is owed to a large extent, to the brains of a few major companies (LG, Samsung, Hyundai etc) which were headed by some tough and very corrupt men. You go to Malaysia, and the "Wahindi-like" Chinese (not the ethnic Malays, despite Mahatir's efforts) drive the action there. Point is govt. itself however well run, will never grow an economy that much, unless you are fortunate to have lots of valuable natural resources (and we missed out here). A country like ours will grow only if people dream beyond putting up rental houses and importing stuff from Dubai. We may get the "best govt" possible, but if we don't have a "culture of creativity", we'll remain the colourless people we are.
Vlad
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by edowino , October 13, 2007
Wanyama,
My comment was not on any of your comments, mine was aimed at this:
Kenyans have watched with increasing consternation as Raila Odinga's popularity has surged in the opinion polls, riding on a wave of crowd-pleasing nothingness and incendiary rhetoric.

Which Kenyans are these? Perhaps they are superior class A Kenyans. OK, so Owino is slavishly devoted to Raila.....Really? On what basis do you come to that conclusion? My surname?? I don't think that allegation deserves the dignity of a proper response. Finally based on your assumptions that I am slavishly devoted to Raila, you go ahead and assert that you have never had a decent, grown-up conversation with a Raila-phile. Great, from this day on, I will operate under the assumption that only PANU fellas are capable of engaging others in mature, decent conversations.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Strategy, strategy
written by edowino , October 13, 2007
Vlad wrote:
Err, ... on your point above, we may not do so because we need to first find aluminium (or oil) in our piece of crust .
If we cannot find any, we'll need enterprising people who can help us get somewhere.

When speaking of growth, there is another example that may be closer home. Ethiopia doesn't have the natural resources you are speaking of, yet they have managed a growth rate that is in excess on 10% over the past few years.
There are better ways to make things work in Kenya with or without natural resources.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Character
written by pndiangui , October 14, 2007
I have addressed Raila's character here which I think should not be abhored by Us. This character can be changed by requiring more out of the man who will be Kenya's next president from the support he has received from Kenyans. This article is about putting Raila's character on spot just like any other leader. I really dont see why it so diffcult to see that the acts above make him pass the test of a duplitious populist who needs to tone down his rhetoric and committ to behaving better than that which he so preaches against.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by emmo opoti , October 14, 2007
Don,
I actually thought NewDay was talking to people like you, who seem unable to see beyond your candidate. I remember the gusto with which you dismissed Kalonzo ( a populist and a promoter of the nanny-state). You had absolutely no time for him or his proposals. Similarly, you have absolutely no time for anything from President Kibaki. For someone who harps on consistently about objectivity, you show more bias than anyone else on these boards.
Maturity for you seems to be in accepting the ODM win as inevitable, everyone who thinks otherwise or votes otherwise is wasting their time, over-analyzing. We do not need to find a righteous politician, it is futile, Raila will do just fine? And damn everyone who thinks different huh?

Owino,
Don't be so petty. The starting line is quite clearly a rhetorical device, and yes you are very biased. I have never heard you speak a single word against the ODM candidate, not even when he so obviously infringes upon principles we both hold sacred. Really to pick just that one line and condemn the whole article on its basis is most petty.

If I said Kenyans are a well-educated people, would you react with just as much venomThe writer is obviously trying to advance a particular argument, which is what all writers do. Do you also find this headline offensive? It is from the Sunday Nation, 'Kenyans should learn to face up to things that are real'

Peter,
I do think that Raila's character is most abhorrent. It is irresponsible I believe to think otherwise. In fact that is the whole point. Whether or not he becomes President is immaterial here. The knowledge of his character determines just how much trust is put on him. Parliament and his own party need in my opinion to be extra vigilant with him.
Our history is detailed with examples of leaders who ascended to national office on the back of euphoria much like this we experience today. The tragedy of our history shows us just how dangerous this approach to elections is. If Kenyans had known who Mwai Kibaki was in 2002, they w(sh)ould never have elected him President. It is wilful the ignorance, that allows us to get them into those positions, and the same ignorance that leads to heartbreak when they let us down.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Objectivity on Economy
written by pndiangui , October 15, 2007
Well well I did not want to bring the Economy and other reforms issue here but for the argument's sake let me get this clear ;

I really don’t see anything much that Kibaki's regime has done in terms of innovative fundamental reforms relative to the period of time that they have had but yes they have done a few things which ODM doesn’t seem concerned about. And as an incoming regime, what worries me the most is that not many of them seem to be aware of what needs to be done to drive economic and social growth. The Bomas draft itself has its big shortcomings especially on devolution (A 4-tier government is bad for a country like ours trying to drive faster investments locally; world over local governments are being merged, India’s infrastructure is losing them FDI to China due to the bureaucracy of a 3-tier devolved government which looks good on paper to lawyers and social rights activists but is skewed towards bottlenecking entrepreneurial investments...I really don’t want to go further on this it's a matter of another article)

I will focus on what the Kibaki governmeent has done extremly wrong but which I dont think ODM has proposed anything better at all.

A New Constitution
Kibaki's regime greatest failure; because these are the utmost fundamentals of putting Kenya into an economic and social progression platform beyond mere Individuals was all about. Kibaki failed terribly on this, especially the failure to provide leadership in the moving the Bomas constitution from drafting phase, to a proper designing phase while maintaining the much needed collaboration and further to its implementation phase. However, much as the ODM team lead a successful campaign onslaught against the Wako draft it wasn’t without a show of the little integrity they applied when citing the sections that they believed were faulty, and the fact that to most of them it wasn’t about the contents of the draft but about a power struggle. The lack of pushing through the necessary legislation in parliament to keep the constitution reform platform of discussion burning to progress the Bomas draft further alludes to my conclusion on this very empty rhetoric.
Populism will lead to an adoption of the Bomas draft as it is, which I think will be as bad as the Wako draft .
Juakali Industry
Lack of Business support services to move these entrepreneurs from hand to mouth SME's to global corporations like somebody has pointed out of the Hyundai and Samsung businesses has been a very big failure of Kibaki’s regime. The dynamics in the global markets for growth are not similar to that period when protectionism was used by the South Koreans dictatorial and corrupt regimes but its the creativity to bring about some reforms and support of these men and women beyond Khs.100,000 youth fund that has been lukewarm from the Kibaki regime. Neither do I see ODM thinking that these are the real holders of Kenya's economic destiny; Raila’s comments on the Jua Kali Industry attest to this. It’s not the FDIs of this world that will drive much of the growth in African nations much as they are extremely essential in offering the support to grow real jobs and even much more, technology transfer, but the outbound corporations emanating from these nation's grassroots like Equity Bank.

Infrastructure Projects financing and Execution
Except what I have seen today from Hon. Kimunya's recent trip to London negotiating for an International Infrastructure bond, the five years have been wasted without giving such ideas room to be executed in large scale for all infrastructure needs and especially Roads ,Ports , Telecommunication, Energy and Water. With retirement funds in the west reaching an all time high , with few assets to put into vis a vis the high global liquidity it was a chance to have Infrastructure bonds registration as early as 2003 , but then shady promissory notes like Anglo leasing popular during the Kanu regime were given a place as means of funding worthless infrastructure projects. The point is Partnerships with infrastructure bonds structuring agents like Australian Macquarie Bank or Babcock & Brown would have brought necessary skills not only for funding but even more important which I dont think has been given much thought, the execution capacity of large infrastructure projects in Roads, Rail, Telco and Energy; Neither have I seen legistration for ensuring such execution trickles down into the local firms in form of technology transfer and jobs through properly designed sub-contracting laws.
For ODM many of them have been members of parliament even for Kibaki’s regime none of them have brought these ideas forth or even took it upon themselves to bring private members bills in the house targeting such reforms and many more.

However, the preparation for a Kenyan LSE (London Stock Exchange ) infrastructure bond is a milestone that I'm willing to go all the way and pat Kimunya on his back albeit coming too late of Kibaki’s regime existence ,this is a huge achievement. From the Standards and Poor rating of a BB+ of the country to give credibility to the bond , that to me attests to the fact that something has been done.
The introduction of Perfomance based contracting by Kibaki’s regime is a huge achievement that if taken further by the incoming ODM regime , it’ll be the hallmark of an upward spiral in productivity in performance in the public service giving way to a better business environment; I would want to see a strategy from ODMers on how they want to take this further.
Putting forward Vision 2030 as a framework of goal setting for this country has also been a very good move by Kibaki’s regime. I would like to hear ODM’s take on this.

Now I think we can engage in a more objective debate based on facts and focusing on the big picture of delivering value to mwananchi not some ‘good to have’ ideologies.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Raila & Kroll
written by pndiangui , October 20, 2007
Again as we saw yesterday , Raila sanitized Moi selectively using the Kroll report which he at the same time accused Kibaki of not acting on. So he sees it best to go in Kabarnet to preach the fact that Moi joined Kibaki because he was forced to by the use of the Kroll report threats, yet when in Western and Nyanza he claims of getting a better hunter for those who plundered the resources than even Kroll and he will act on it. Now if this is what we call 'scheming' , then I call dangerous public hypocricy and duplicity.
I wish we can also call Kibaki's calling people 'Pumbavu' as humour schemes. Or even joining forces with Moi and Uhuru as 'scheming' to defeat 'forces of darkness' like Ntimama and Henry Kosgey.
Why not see Raila's utterances and other behaviours as to what they are; a sub-machiavelism sort of a thing that major dictators world over have used to prey on non-suspecting citizens. That is why new constitution agitators would be clobered while rallying support for Raila's quest of a new consitution order before he became a Moi crony, yet they would again be used by Raila to clober Ufungamano group of people including akina Orengo and Ooki Ombaka who were agitating for the same reforms.
And when we say that this kind of a man who doesnt entertain dissidents, becoming president is dangerous, we are lynched as tribalists. Shocking.

And there you have it those who think that ODM stands for anything;
From its Prime minister to be, this is what came out on the controversial Ndung'u report on land grabbing.
Ruto responded: "My name and that of Raila are in the report. How can we implement it? We are not foolish to implement a report that was engineered by our enemies."
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Ngu\'ngu Commision-ati nini?
written by Mukenya , October 20, 2007
Good article and response to many a hypochrite. Not only is there no coherent economic policy, majimbo policy, we can now also include no anti-corruption policy.

I forggot these are the ODM malaikas.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
the \'us-vs-them\' anthem
written by new day , October 22, 2007
From what am getting out of these communications, generally ODM is at the receiving end of harsh criticism by those in the realpolitik as a result of the opinion polls (dismissed by those portrayed as losing) which show ODM and its leader ahead by more than 10 per cent. Specifically on economic issues, from what I inteprete from those opposing the Orange Democratic Movement, is that RAO is likely to lead the country into the trenches of economic ruin. Reasons given: He has not shown any outstanding economic achievements (the president said during a campaign session on friday, 'huyo mtu hata hajawahi kufuga kuku')..

Last week David Mwiraria told journalists that infact RAO used to return unspent funds meant for roads constructions during his 3 or so years in the roads ministry. It was not clear as to under what circumstances the money was being returned. Now, if this was the case, was this a good gesture(showing integrity) or bad(showing poor management)?

Recent polls (infotrack, consumer insight and PR-SR)by sector published in today's Nation Newspaper show that on average, ODM leader tops the favourites list on economic terms ! I have heard claims that RAO is hopeless on the economic front until I saw this. Wherefrom did this come from, which sample of Kenyan voters I don't know. Now I expected EMK to top any charts starting with the word 'economy'. and since that too has not come to pass (miracles), I guess that maybe there is more to an election other than just statistics (usually tiring, stressing and confounding). Now RAO says he will publish his achievements during the MOI and EMK regimes.

Quoting pndiangui: And when we say that this kind of a man who doesnt entertain dissidents, becoming president is dangerous, we are lynched as tribalists. Shocking.

A very potent statement from pndiangui above unveils the taking of sides that is characteristic of this year's elections. Use of extreme expressions such as lynching, dissident and dangerous have been noted. In addition, pndiangui describes RAO as 'this kind of a man', showing that it is not only him but his ilk. Does this categorize RAO under the umbrella of his community or is it meant to generalize men who are impatient with opposition, not so clear.

Early last week, a storm was brewing at the NSE regarding statements alleged to have come from RAO on suspicions of money laundering at the market. The Finance Minister, in an attempt to co-relate RAO's statements with falling NSE indicators, made statements about the fish market which were not taken positively and were seen to demean a certain community where 'fis' is a predominant economic activity.

In a nutshell, my learning from all these public statements centre on stereotypes that some communities are too naive when it comes to money matters. Apparently, this time round voters seem to be looking at communities and not individuals. RAO is still leading the 3-horse race and if this trend goes on like this, EMK will progressively become a very worried man(it's starting to show from his Kenyatta Day anti-RAO over drives)and we may have to watch his health closely. Interestingly, RAO is becoming increasingly relaxed and daring (his repeated calls for parliament to be dissolved). As both groups spend every waking hour plotting how to distabilize their opponent, let us all advocate for peace and live to see 2008. new day.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
On Ndungu report
written by pndiangui , October 23, 2007
New day

Care to address the flip-flopping of RAO and his Prime-minister to be on the issue of the Ndung'u report?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
The Nding\'u report
written by new day , October 23, 2007
According to media reports, Spectre International, the land on which a firm owned by the Odinga family stands is listed in the Ndung'u report.

In a suit filed under a certificate of urgency, Spectre argued that the commission of enquiry on illegal/irregular allocation of public land had made a finding that allocations of titles to the parcels of land situated in Kisumu were illegal and recommended that the matter be investigated further. The commission was appointed by President Kibaki to enquire into the allocation to private individuals or corporations of public land reserved for public purposes.

According to RAO, 'Spectre International bought the land in a transaction consummated in the proper manner and there was a history as early as 1996'.

Quoting the East African Standard: In June 1996, Spectre placed a financial bid of Sh570 million and was declared the highest bidder thus acquiring the plant.

In 2001, the firm sought to be allotted the land, a request that was granted. Kenya Chemical and Food Corporation (KCFC) ran the plant before the Odinga family acquired it. It uses a sugar by-product, molasses, to produce power alcohol for the export market.

Damn am sounding as if am a RAO supporter. new day
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
What did Raila do with molasse
written by manta ray , October 28, 2007
In 1995-96, Raila fund raised 580million from members of the Luo community ostensibly to buy the Kisumu molasses plant on their behalf through a company called Kisumu Development Trust. The records show that the plant was allocated to the Odinga family immediately after NDP merged with KANU in 2000. They paid a mere 3.6 million for it. The plant is now owned 45% by the Odinga family and 55% by Canadian company Energem. What then happened to those funds? I remember Oburu being questioned about the money and he claimed that the money was safe in the Bank. Doing what in the Bank? What about the interests of the people who made the contributions? Shoudn't they be shareholders in the molasses plant? Why are they not shareholders and if they are not shareholders, why have the Odingas not refunded the money?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Write comment

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
Last Updated ( Saturday, 06 October 2007 )
 
< Prev   Next >


Archives | About Us | KenyaImagine How To | Privacy Policy | ContactUs | Join KenyaImagine |  Advertise Here| Legal Disclaimer | Terms & Conditions | Directory
rss-2.png

 

Copyright 2009 KenyaImagine.com, the KenyaImagine logo and KenyaImagine.com are trademarks of  The Imagine Company