purchase viagra onlinebuy CIALIS 20mgbuy cialis online
Their Pants on Fire PDF Print E-mail
Written by Kipchirchir Boit   
Thursday, 28 February 2008

I must, we must all, be optimistic about this new agreement. It is a chance for transparency in the short term but unless we put in place stringent accountability measures, the evils brought on by mistrust, corruption and tribalism will  return and rise to new heights.

This coalition agreement represents for me the culmination of a political journey. Initially I supported Kibaki's government. It is true that he has put in place a macroeconomic policy framework that has the potential to greatly improve Kenya's fortunes.

Later on, I found myself drawn to and rooting for Raila Odinga for his apparent strong stance against corruption. This was especially because no matter how many brilliant economic policies you put forward, in the presence of corruption economic gains are frittered away, as enjoyment of the benefits is greatly restricted to those who are well-connected. A nation cannot celebrate even a 10% economic growth rate when 50% of its population subsists below poverty line. The destruction of corruption networks and the promotion of clean accountable government must be our main obsession moving forward, everything else hinges on how successful we are in this struggle.

It does not matter too much who is president. All politicians, by my reckoning should be considered guilty, from an oversight perspective, until proven innocent. If we maintain transparency mechanisms, if we expose the business of government to broad daylight, to the scrutiny of the media and the electorate, we will have succeeded in establishing the foundations for greater economic and social progress. It is not just for the sake of the taxpayer, I say this for our sake - that we know the thieves and dismiss them from public service; and for the politicians' sake - that they may not suffer from political witch-hunts and the blanket slurs against parties which come from the fact that the public perceives graft, but cannot point at specifics.

But even more important than the benefits this will bring politicians and political parties, is the effect it will have on relaxing ethnic tensions and the suspicions that certain regions are preferred over others. We cannot afford to have fears guide our political choices, we cannot afford to have the public believe that there exist in public life untouchables, people who despite their involvement in the theft and misuse of public resources persist with impunity in public office. By pointing out individuals and holding them specifically to account, we protect their communities from having to carry the guilt of these individuals.

It is not that I am condoning such characterisation, but until the average Kenyan on the ground sees themselves as Kenyan and not 'whatever-tribe,' the tribal card will be played time and time again by the politicians. Efforts at creating a more transparent public service will deny such politicians the ammunition with which to attack entire ethnicities for the sins of a few.

So let's just assume that the whole bunch [of politicians] is corrupt and that they are just itching for their next chance to steal, perhaps even taking advantage of their new found unity to effect a salary raise in the next few months!

There are immense powers and opportunities for graft available in public office, so much so that we should not even trust that people like Mother Teresa and Nelson Mandela are not perfect. It is systems, and not morals that will stand in our defence

At the end of the day - every politician must say

" Were not my pants on fire
  My words, to the world, would inspire
  It is thus the fault of these pants
  A burden of delight in which I must prance
  Oh electorate, restitute my suffering
  Just five years, for a better pair of pants" 





Digg!Del.icio.us!Google!Facebook!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Trackback(0)
Comments (9)add
0
on accountability
written by Stephen Wanyama , February 29, 2008
Here is something interesting, on accountability and the law.

Apparently one of the sticky points in the negotiation effort, was an attempt by the ODM to insist on immunity from prosecution for Raila. Many have speculated that it is this single factor more than any other that explains the desperation of the ODM, and the resolution of our indefatigable Martha.
On Wednesday, it emerged that ODM had presented a draft Act of Parliament giving its guidelines on how to establish a coalition and create the post of an executive prime minister immune from criminal and civil prosecutionӔ.
Link here.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Corruption free?
written by Nyabs , February 29, 2008
Boit, maybe you know something that I don't know. Almost all the men and women behind ODM and in the Pentagon have been implicated of corruption at one point or another. In fact, one of them has a case in court on some corrupt land deal. One is said to have brought down a national assurance company and "eaten" the All African Games. Another was senior government officer during the years of misrule and open and blantant corruption by Moi.

Going by the adage that a man is known by the company he keeps, pray, how would Raila have run a clean government composed of people with past integrity issues?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Accountability
written by Andrew , March 01, 2008
On Wednesday, it emerged that ODM had presented a draft Act of Parliament giving its guidelines on how to establish a coalition and create the post of an executive prime minister immune from criminal and civil prosecution.

It always amazes me to see ones fixation on painting others black for no good reason. Cease being disingenuous!!! Just as the office of the President as currently instituted IS immune from civil and criminal prosecution, so do some propose the office of the PM should be! This fixation with Raila should really stop, he was said to be responsible for every fate that befell the previous administration...including Martha!
We are not talking PERSONS here, we are talking offices, and placing bold and quotation marks will not change that at all; all said Goebbels did better with less, you may need to work at being a better student!
Class five and six English. I may send a bill at this rate. I find that to be a pretty pedestrian observation that my infant son would easily have made.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Politics
written by James Watt , March 01, 2008
It's ironic that we are calling for the direct elections for mayors, because the way their are chosen now by their councillors has proved to be completely ineffective and corruptible, yet with the same breadth, some are asking for an executive PM chosen just like the current mayors are chosen by the councillors, by parliament.

Case in point the mayoral elections in Nairobi and Nakuru. In both the ODM has the numbers in both the elections turned there was a tie. In Nairobi, the ODM ended up with the mayor and the PNU with the chairmanship of all the relevant committees. In Nakuru the PNU ended up with the Mayor. That is why people clamour for an executive directly-elected by the people and accountable to them. Folks there is nothing wrong with the system we have now. We elect the man or woman who is directly accountable to us. Granted the office has too much power that can be clipped and some of those powers given to parliament as well as divorcing the judiciary from that particular office. What some people want is a person running the show who is indirectly elected. I'm averse to this.

Why do we want to dismantle what is essentially good for that which is likely to offer us much grief in the future? Already the parliamentary elections in the foregone elections were a high stakes affair because of the shameless amount of money that has turned the post of MP into a get rich quick scheme. Give the power of electing the executive to the MPs and you'll see just how unstable the country will become. A little clause in the present coalition agreement should give you sign of things to come. If parliament is dissolved, or one of the parties opts out then the government collapses. Now changing majorities is a reality in most countries. Any one who follows, Israeli or Italian politics will know.

Can our country, then be able to live in the atmosphere of constant elections as our corrupt politicians switch allegiances like whores. Won't the country just be in constant campaign mode. Elections since 1992 have brought a culture of pain, death and destruction. Is this really the way forward?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Pessimistic
written by Kim G , March 01, 2008
Thanks Boit for bringing out the possible positive outcomes of the Kofi Annan peace deal. However, I wish I could share your optimism. We now have a one party state composed of all the people who have contributed to Kenyas mess. All the political characters of the 1960s, 70s, 80s and upto the present day are now in coalition government. Yet, we expect these same people to create a clean, transparent, accountable government. Sometimes we Kenyans are too naive for words. Five years down the line, we will find ourselves undergoing worse problems and then we will be looking for someone to blame. Its a bit like the victim of an abusive relationship who keeps going back for more abuse ...
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
accountability
written by Stephen Wanyama , March 01, 2008
Don't you think we should be campaigning for even that presidential immunity to be lifted, rather than giving it to the Prime Minister as well? While at it, why not give this to the Vice President also?.

What exactly is the Prime Minister likely to be doing for which he needs immunity from prosecution? DO those of you proposing this realise that civilised countries do not have such archaic laws, throwbacks to days when Europe was ruled by kings with divine right.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Boit-Thanks
written by Nyabs , March 01, 2008
Thank you Boit. On this, I am in total agreement with you.

@Wanyama, I also agree with you that this immunity nonsense should be disposed of immediately. Do people get into public office planning to break laws? If no, why do they need immunity?

Back on corruption, the only way we are going to have clean government and councils is strengthening KACC, giving it prosecurial powers and suspending people under investigations on corruption from holding office until they are cleared in a court of law, and barring them permanently from ever holding public office if they are found guilty.

Then and only then we will be able to stop this circus of former thieves, using money they stole from us, coming back and claiming to be our saviours from those who might want to steal from us.

Savour with me the joy of seeing these discredited so called leaders slinking away into oblivion, shamed, never to be seen in public life again!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Corruption Free?? Good questi
written by kboit , March 01, 2008
Going by the adage that a man is known by the company he keeps, pray, how would Raila have run a clean government composed of people with past integrity issues?


Nyabs - your question drives to the heart of the matter. Ultimately, any hope I had of Raila cleaning up shop is just simply ... well ... hope. At the end of it all, I began to realize that anti-corruption was the platform of Kibaki in 2002 - now its the platform of Raila in 2007.

This is hence the basis for my current line of reasoning - lets just assume everyone's integrity is compromised. You ask about the integrity of Raila and ODM in general - I can offer no guarantees about their 'goodness' or 'honesty'. As a matter of fact, I wouldn't even attempt to justify them. Therefore my answer to your first question is a no Nyabs there I don't have any secret information that you may not know of smilies/smiley.gif

That's why I am pushing so hard for this issue of transparency and heavy accountability because ultimately, all we have is inuendo and this issue of dealing with corruption has been 'redykulassly' reduced to divination where every MP prophetically claims "I am not corrupt but my political enemies are - I have evidence but I will not show you". Let's not waste time wondering who is corrupt and who is not - they are all guilty, every last one - and they cannot be trusted. Lets close the loopholes that allow decisions without oversight in any aspect of government so that if someone steals or diverts funds, we will know.

And by the way ... my two cents on the 'immunity of the PM' issue - I think its , as Andrew says, a standard issue with the executive (assuming the PM is part of the executive) - that the sitting PM is immune from prosecution but only during tenure. Hence the PM (or president), if highly suspected of gross misconduct, is relieved of their post and THEN prosecuted for crimes BUT I am no means trained in the law so anyone who has a clearer perspective on the matter feel free to correct me.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Accountability
written by Andrew , March 02, 2008
Ah, the penny drops!!! Welcome on board Wanyama, you may yet be redeemed. THAT is EXACTLY what right thinking Kenyans want; not a narrow fixation with Raila, Kibaki, Kalonzo etc.

We MUST fashion a Nation State that functions well and serves all of society so that even if an imbecile was elected by the people (It's their right) the Nation will not stumble and fall.

Your redemption may be nigh...
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Write comment

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
Last Updated ( Friday, 29 February 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >


Archives | About Us | KenyaImagine How To | Privacy Policy | ContactUs | Join KenyaImagine |  Advertise Here| Legal Disclaimer | Terms & Conditions | Directory
rss-2.png

 

Copyright 2009 KenyaImagine.com, the KenyaImagine logo and KenyaImagine.com are trademarks of  The Imagine Company