Home
If only stupidity had a cure... PDF Print E-mail
Written by Caleb Otieno   
Monday, 25 June 2007

One of my favorite works of art is a painting by the Dutch painter, Hieronymus Bosch titled The Extraction of the Stone of Madness (The Cure of Folly). Or as some reference works refer to it, The Stone Operation.

Dem Narren den Stein schneidenThe painting is not much to look at, but like most things in life, it is the simplicity of it that grabs you. In it a young man is seated on a chair about to undergo surgery. Nothing remarkable about that, unless you take in the fact that it is in the 16th Century and medical procedures were back then, to say the least, mediocre.

My interest is piqued by what the surgery is supposed to be for. In those times, logic and medicine could not be used in the same sentence. For instance for a long time, it was believed that shedding pints of blood would help a patient get over a fever. But I digress. The man is about to have a stone removed from his head. And no, it was not lodged there by any normal means. It’s not like he was struck, or he fell on it.

The folklore at the time stated that folly, or stupidity, was caused by a stone that was lodged in the brain. The size of the stone was directly proportional to a man’s stupidity. In short, the sillier the man, the larger the rock. The man in the painting has decided that he’s had enough of being the village idiot and wants to get rid of the stone that is impeding his brilliance from shining forth. Or maybe his family pushed him to do it.

Either way, I laud him. I just wish that it were real. I wish that modern science could come up with a way to rid mankind of the stupidity and ignorance that is afflicting the world. And this is not just limited to the uneducated or the semi-literate. I would dare say that all prejudices are based on stupidity and a whole lot of ignorance. That is just one example.

All the world’s problems would be solved if everyone would just take a little time to just get to know abit more. I am not going to pontificate here. I too suffer from occassional bouts of folly. A sweeping statement? Maybe… But look at it this way…

-If Americans had taken a little more time to find out what exactly was going on in Iraq, I am sure there would have been a much more peaceful solution the debacle that was that nation. Now, calling Iraq a debacle is a great understatement.

-If the world had paid attention to Rwanda just two weeks after the genocide started, 800,000 people would still be alive and Central Africa would be a whole lot more peaceful. But instead, they decided to ignore it. And now, aside from the massive loss of life, Uganda, Burundi, and DRC have all felt the effects of that one nation’s unrest.

-If world leaders had acted a whole lot earlier, I am sure Hitler woul have thought twice about setting up the concentration camps that killed millions and alienated an entire country from the rest of the world.

-If only Third World leaders would get to know how much their kow-towing to the whims of the developed nations hurt their citizens, the extent of poverty in their nations wouldn’t be so widespread. So many more lives would be saved. If only they could step up to the giant pharmaceuticals and manufacture the generic drugs that would help the massive numbers of their population that suffer from HIV/AIDS.

I could rant on and on about the folly that belies all the deaings that we as humans engage in a day to day basis. Time, though, would fail me. Some may claim rational ignorance.

When is ignorance ever rational? When the cost of educating oneself about the issue sufficiently to make an informed decision can outweigh any potential benefit one could reasonably expect to gain from that decision, and so it would be irrational to waste time doing so.

For example if I need to read a whole manifesto to know a candidates stand, then rather than read it, I’d rather just vote for the one I find most attractive, or eloquent, or whoever wins the coin toss. And trust me that is an election technique.

By increasing the number of issues that one would need to consider in order to pick the correct person, the politicians and their minions simply reduce it to a matter of single topic, or a party line. Thus despite having a list of about 200, a candidate may choose a single topic such as tax reduction as his punch line. And most of us when faced with a choice between tax reduction and better infrastructure, would go for the former. Despite the fact that the candidate who promises better infrastructure has a better manifesto, and/or qualifications.

In short, life on earth would be a whole lot more better if we paid just a little more attention; tried to learn a little more.

So next time you have to make a decision, whether it is buying a product, or buying a politicians line, just take some time to find out a little more.


Caleb Otieno
About the author:




Digg!Del.icio.us!Google!Facebook!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Trackback(0)
Comments (10)add
0
...
written by Marangu , June 25, 2007
How very well written, don't they say the more things change the more they stay the same. With all the advancements, history etc, one would think we would be wiser. So Kenyans head for the general elections at the end of the year (hopefully) and already the politicians are reeling them in, using the same old stale catch phrases and promises. Will Kenyans fall for those... you bet!
This is not a problem peculiar to Kenya or Africa for that matter, I am reminded of the overheating political climate in Australia, with the federal elections due at the end of the year, the incumbent, who has been a Prime Minister for the last 11 years and striving for another term has just 'discovered' a formular to fix a 40+ year old Aboriginal social dilemma. And this is making headlines and it will amass more votes for him, will it solve the said issue? Yes, for the next 6 months, and Australians will be subjected to the same issue when the next elections come round.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Hmmm
written by Honey , June 25, 2007
Summarily, the kind of approach you so desire will halt the very existence of mankind.

It is not going to happen, today nor tomorrow.

I am beginning to think the author is not the one analysing the issues he raises keenly. Think about it. The perpretors of all the mentioned atrocities are not stupid, and even if you wanted to think about it, you woouldn't get there.

Iraq case...Harliburton is not complaining now is it?. Ask yourself, who is gaining from this war. It maybe be a adebacle as concerns the deaths of Iraqs and the poor Americans drafted into it, for the likes of Harliburton, business gets only better.

Force pharmaceutical companies to permit production of generics? Fat chance.
And how do you suppose you can force them? There,you have no standing.
I personally can not allow my invention be used free of charge, it is not charity. Alot of funds are put in research, and that is why when they get sued for cases like Viox, Celebrex, it hurts the business really bad.
Alittle greedy, yes. Are they wrong, no!
On this issue, Africa must work with what it has.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Of Prejudice
written by Honey Rider , June 25, 2007
There is a tendency of people throwing around this word 'stupid'.
I hope to not exhibit philosophical randomness in my explanation. This is how I get it.

Prejudice is borne of fear & inadequacy and not stupidity. A fear of the unknown, a fear of trying new things, and a deep feeling of inadequacy that spills over as prejudice. Or even self hate.

Stupid is as stupid goes. Who is exactly stupid? Take two young Kenyans, one whose exposure limited to a section of Kenya for some 30 years. Then there is a second who by a fluke, happened to be raised in priviledge and as such has been around an environment that encouraged curiosity, inquiry. He/she tends to give balanced opinions of society. The later turns around to call the former stupid, I think the later is the stupid one for not realizing the stark differences. And if the views of the two are similar, then the later must be biologically truly stupid too...really stupid as in close to Demented, which again can be ruled as a mental illness!

In their environment, and from what they know, Kenyans vote accordingly.
A enyan woman once asked, and I have posted such before: In acountry where a social support system is non-existent, is causing bad blood btwn a couple helpful or not. She may sound stupid to you the elite for choosing to stay with a lousy husband, but she is certain her children will go to school, albeit in tough cnditions, but they will. How smart is encouraging her to leave, only to land them on the streets or Mungiki recruits.

This 'stupid' needs to be studied first before application.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Marangu , June 26, 2007
Honey:
I think you missed the spirit of this article. I will not engage on what could be purely your opinion because you are entitled to it. On the issue of Medications, patents and generics, did I get it right that you feel that is justifiable for the mainstream manufacturers to hold patent rights for whatever period they desire in order to reward their research efforts?
Well, the bad news is they would rather have those patent rights forever. It can be argued that letting the fat cats continue amassing wealth when the rest of the world dies off is, actually, rather stupid.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
ok
written by Wuoyi , June 26, 2007
The point of the article was not to look down on people of lower intelligence or those not privileged enough to have an expanded world view.
Stupidity may seem to be a harsh word to use, but to me it seems to be the most apt. What else could you use to describe a combination of irresponsibility, shortsightedness, ignorance and misplaced pride?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by a guest , June 28, 2007
Author
In my very many years on earth, I have learnt to accept one scientist who said: I am yet to meet a human being so stupid he did not teach me athing!
Do not dismiss people as stupid before you know how/why they do the stupid things. But again, what yardstick are you using to determine stupididity, irresponsibility, false pride and ignorance? Academia? Social Intelligence?

Marangu
No, the inventors have certain periods to recover their costs of research and make profits.
However, it is a business too, NOT Charity.

Simply put, the big pharmas, the West all have 24 hours a day...same to the dying half of the world, why is the dying half of the world not picking up their slack?
Are they incapabe of doing research?

Half the world will continue dying even if Big pharmas subsidized prices, or allowed generic production, for the real problem does not lie in their refusal to allow the same. It is the disorganization of the dying half of the world.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Marangu , June 29, 2007
Anonymous:
Your attitude is understandable, the reasons you cite have been used by the major pharmaceutical companies, only they, are very articulate about the reasons they advance, unlike you, they do not call 'a spade a spade'. I don't believe that enabling access to medications and medical technology to those who cannot afford will bankrupt these mega campanies.
It might interest you to know that equitable access to medical care does not necessarily mean that the user pays the full quid, rather, its a combination of factors including subsidies by the government agencies, NGOs etc, factors that sadly lack in much of Africa.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Stephen Wanyama , June 30, 2007
I agree in part with Honey, who is I believe also carelessly posting as Anonymous, a bad habit that could be pushed aside. There are many evil people, pushing nefarious schemes about who are not at all stupid. What they are is immoral.

The money trail that governs mankind, at every level but the bottom one is populated by the best and the brightest. Tony Blair, Bill Clinton, Paul Wolfowitz, the ones in the shadows, etc. Not a single fool.

Still, Caleb has a solid point if we are referring to democracies, or the fact that many of these decisions are often backed by the very people who they will later come to harm.

Today's Standard for example, has an article on Nyeri town. Now this town, headquarters of Central Province( wealthiest Kenyan Province), and DP run since 1992 is a living hell-hole. Likely, its citizens kept blaming Moi and declaring it sidelined till 2002. One hopes they now know better. Still, they will turn out in large numbers to return the same leaders to office, and endorse the sleepy one giving him another turn for a DUI of sleep.

Marangu, Honey
The government has a core duty to protect life. Saving lives affected by HIV-AIDs is one of those core duties. International companies? Ask Yusuf Hamied or the government of India what they think of that. Ask Microsoft or Google what they think of China's negotiators. Our trouble is that our politicians do not take their duties seriously. I dare anyone to send an email to a Kenyan parastatal, amybe KNH, or the Ministry itself, even offer free medicine. Then start counting sheep. You will likely never get a response.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Marangu , June 30, 2007
Fully agree, it has never been the objective of the leading elite in Kenya to concern themselves with the issues you are talking about Stephen, and yes, I agree that in the next couple of months many a Kenyan will spend sleepless nights politiking and even making enemies with their neighbours, only to recycle the same old cronies. So we are guaranteed of the same poor health, economic and social indicators.
So why would we be surprised that no one would respond to an email or telephone enquiry at either Afya House, KNH or even Ikulu? It's not just the stuff that gets the politikos interested.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Global
written by Anointed , July 03, 2007
On the issue of medicine i think Africans need to have an indegenous approach to fighting aids , i will not be suprised if their is a herbalist out there with the cure only no one cares to take him seriously ,we would rather whine about multinationals and what not.It is within the rights of these companies to withhold their intellectual rights and property(these are the reasons why we are employed and paid ) , after all such is the oil that lubricates the wheels of world economy.PS/ wanyama , anon option is a brilliant idea in blogging because some people hate to receive hate mail, stalkers, etc when they reveal their identity , i could easily give my self a fictional name ie stephen wanyama what diffrence does it make if iam ANON.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Write comment

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 24 June 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >


Login/Register

Login/ Register

click to subscribe
feed image

Contact

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it for content related questions and suggestions

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it for republication enquiries

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it to report faults or offensive comment.


Archives | About Us | KenyaImagine How To | Privacy Policy | ContactUs | Join KenyaImagine |  Advertise Here| Legal Disclaimer | Terms & Conditions | Directory
rss-2.png

 

Copyright 2009 KenyaImagine.com, the KenyaImagine logo and KenyaImagine.com are trademarks of  The Imagine Company