Home
Kenyans: Our Own Worst Enemies PDF Print E-mail
Written by Ombuya E. Okongo   
Saturday, 28 April 2007

Ask Kenyans what kind of leaders they want in government and they will tell you precisely - almost in unison:

Those who will create good jobs, construct smooth highways, make education affordable, reduce crime and stem corruption. The latter is especially important because achieving it makes the preceding expectations possible. It therefore, makes sense for Kenyans to speak out against graft, and they do so every day - loudly.

For any government to make progress in addressing the concerns of its people, citizens must be willing to make sacrifices. They must support any policies that are likely to benefit them, even when those in power are from rival parties - or in Kenya's unfortunate reality, tribes.

You don't have to ask anyone to know if Kenyans are capable of putting their country above individual interests. Are we able to give up some things so our communities can flourish? The answer is a resounding no. We have been trained to oppose the government of the day, even when we can admit it has done well in some areas. We won't make concessions.

We want it all. Now!

We are overly cynical. The country is not getting better. It doesn't matter that since 2002, civil servants are actually getting paid when the government says they will. Or that through the Constituency Development Fund Act of 2003, money is being channeled to aid citizen projects, thanks to a more effective tax collection and record keeping system. Free primary education doesn't count as progress. We don't pay any attention to the freedom of expression that now allows Kenyans to openly criticize their government from the streets or the abundant media outlets. Yes, these are all strides of achievements by the government, but not fast enough, many of us will say.

We want more. Now!

What about all the corruption? Yes, the government is corrupt to the core. In fact, President Mwai Kibaki himself - like most Kenyan politicians - has a questionable past. But we cannot blame leaders solely for the existence of the vice. We all must share responsibility if we wish to see our country improve in all aspects.

Last month at the Kenyan Diaspora investment convention in Atlanta, Georgia., Dr. Eric Masinde Aseka, a Kenyatta University professor and Fulbright Scholar at Kennesaw State University talked about the country's desperate need for a "new culture." Aseka urged those in attendance to dismantle the current culture of tribalism, corruption and nepotism and replace it with one that embraces moral integrity and respect. A standing ovation at the end of his speech was a signal that his audience, which included Finance Minister Amos Kimunya, agreed. Aseka's message needs to resonate throughout Kenya.

We can't expect the government to reduce corruption when on the other hand we bribe our way out of every situation. Engaging in such acts only makes it easier for those in government to demand kickbacks. While in Kenya last year, I rode in an overcrowded matatu from Nyamira to Kisii. We approached a police roadblock and as expected, the conductor bribed the cops.

"This government is so corrupt," a man bitterly complained. "I'm not voting for a Mkikuyu ever again."

I had heard so many similar complaints but had in all cases I walked away without a word. I was not going to repeat the mistake.

"What are you doing to help Kibaki end corruption?" I asked him.

The man said it wasn't his job. He was not the one who had run for office in 2002 promising that if elected he would devote his time to ending corruption, he said.

I agreed. But isn't a county like a household with the president as the head? Can a father be expected to patrol alone every spot in the homestead to check for broken fences? Should his daughters wait for him to discover their bedroom's leaking roof?

We have to collectively construct an integral culture and make it clear to those we elect that we will not tolerate any deviations from it. That is our inescapable civic duty. Civic? Isn't that one of those words that only make sense in the West where people are more educated and know their rights?

It appears so. But Kenyans are some of the most highly educated people in the world, with a literacy level of 85 percent - one of the best in the world. Our people are capable of making their own decisions if provided with accurate information and a favorable environment. Let's teach those of us who haven't had the opportunity to see the likelihood of an alternative world that such a paradise is possible with patience and hard work. Instead of watching our fellow citizens follow their leaders obliviously, encourage them to think for themselves. Tell that young man in the overcrowded matatu that he should bear as much a burden as the government if he wants a better community - that opposing things just for the sake of it is a lazy path that eventually insults his wounds.

Let's advocate patience, one of the most important African values. (Haraka haina baraka). It takes weeks or even months for a person bitten once by a dog to heal; a country left in the hands of hyenas for four decades will take at least that many years to recover.


Ombuya E. Okongo
About the author:
Edwin is a widely published Kenyan journalist, humorist, memoirist and satirist in the United States.




Digg!Del.icio.us!Google!Facebook!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Trackback(0)
Comments (22)add
0
What is wrong.
written by aeichener , April 28, 2007
What is wrong? Let us begin with the very first sentence of Edwin Ombuya Okong'o, containing a common and popular presupposition that is already wrong.

It's the mindless talk about "leaders" in the government. But what Kenya needs in her government, are not "leaders", and even less that ominous "liidaah-sheep".
No. What she needs instead, and very urgently needs, is service; a service mentality. And diligent servants.

Alexander
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
citizens\' responsibility
written by Amina , April 28, 2007
Alex, I believe that the author is asking Kenyans not to only have expectation from "leedahs". His whole article addresses what is wrong with Kenya, not just the leadership, but the citizens.

Gross corruption at every level of the system is not unique to Kenya-- watch India and China. What then is the difference between our level/stage of development and theirs?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by jayawardene , April 28, 2007
I should like to hear more on Alex's service and diligent servant model.

There is definitely a serious lack of both. I would ask whether perhaps there is also a lack of understanding on the part of the service user/consumer/client/customer/whatever as to acceptable standards of service.

When I was a kid you could set your watch by observing the time that the KBS bus arrived at your stop. I used to catch the number 28 at Valley arcade. Today and right here in Bliars land bus timetables are works of pure fiction....
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by aeichener , April 28, 2007
And on Okong'o's last sentence:
Patience is one of the most important African vices, not values. What Africa needs in order to develop, is a bit more impatience of her people. They have been patient, waiting and suffering for too long.

Alexander
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Civic responsibility an alien
written by jotero , April 29, 2007
Mr. Okongo is talking about "civic responsibility" our duty as citizens.

This concept is apparently alien to some Kenyans judging by the responses this post has elicited.

Civic responsibility doesn't end with voting we must remain engaged and help the government in achieving national goals.

We are the government it is "we the people" and it is our character that is the governments character. We cannot accept individual corruption and expect the society to be free from corruption.

Therefore to fight corruption we must start with ourselves and then reject it in the wider society at all levels it is our civic duty.

Our duty goes beyond criticism "keeping the government on its toes". It is equally important to support the government where we believe it is doing right and moving in the direction we want.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re: What is wrong.
written by That Kenyan Loser , April 29, 2007
Let us begin with the very first sentence of Edwin Ombuya Okong'o ...

Alex, what is the logic behind using my name contrary to how it appears on the by line? This is the second time I'm noticing that.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Timothy Wainaina , April 29, 2007
Otero, Okong'o
Whereas it is important even vital that the national energy is not fully expended on oppositional politics, it is also vital that the government is kept on its toes by a citizenry that constantly demands ever better standards of delivery.

To make excuses for government, even to spread the blame for societal malaise beyond the corridors of power may sound high-minded but in the end it provides the government with a battery of excuses based on which it fails to deliver. Why for example should the government deal with the clashes in Mt. Elgon if there'll be an Otero and an Okong'o suggesting that the blame for the chaos is not the government's but that of the people of that region?

If competitive democracy is about a contest for the approval of the voter, then this climate where the government suffers criticism over and above what is fair is necessary to compel it to ever higher standards of delivery.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re: Civic responsibility an al
written by That Kenyan Loser , April 29, 2007
Mr. Okongo is talking about "civic responsibility" our duty as citizens.

This concept is apparently alien to some Kenyans judging by the responses this post has elicited.

Civic responsibility doesn't end with voting we must remain engaged and help the government in achieving national goals.

We are the government it is "we the people" and it is our character that is the governments character. We cannot accept individual corruption and expect the society to be free from corruption.

Therefore to fight corruption we must start with ourselves and then reject it in the wider society at all levels it is our civic duty.

Our duty goes beyond criticism "keeping the government on its toes". It is equally important to support the government where we believe it is doing right and moving in the direction we want.

Thank you, Jotero. You, Amina and Jayawardene clearly read my article.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
faux enlightenment
written by emmo opoti , April 29, 2007
What to say? Could the analogies be more anachronistic? Kibaki is compared to a father!!

All government must be held to account, and kept on their toes perpetually. Okong'os article clearly shows that the Kibaki administration has done a lot wrong. So why not criticise it, and no as much as the tout has a moral obligation not to be corrupt it is nowhere near the level of responsibility that a sitting President owes the citizens for whom he handles the powers of state.

Really, you would have done far better to disabuse him of the slanderous lie that the Gikuyu are innately corrupt.

that opposing things just for the sake of it is a lazy path that eventually insults his wounds.

Nice sounding empty formulation this. The responsible citizen's duty is to resist the corrupting influences of power, not to cheer his government along. Government, dear Okong'o, cannot help but be corrupt.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re:
written by That Kenyan Loser , April 29, 2007

Why for example should the government deal with the clashes in Mt. Elgon if there'll be an Otero and an Okong'o suggesting that the blame for the chaos is not the government's but that of the people of that region?

Read the article again, Mr. Wainaina. Nowhere do I mention or imply Mt. Elgon. I was talking about the culture of corruption which Kenyans have to reject for such problems to disappear.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by emmo opoti , April 29, 2007
Okong'o
I did read your article. If I can take you up on your analogy that compares the President, and by extension the government to a father. Would you say that the analogy itself demands that we have different standards for different levels of ability and authority? Kibaki is not charged with eradicating corruption, this indeed is a task for the wider Kenyan society, but corruption is a societal malaise, handed down from on top with the poor citizen imitating the actions of his 'parents' and betters.

On your softly, softly approach to government. As I have asked of others before, was this also your reaction to Moi? To Kenyatta? For a fact those who are relentless in their criticism of Kibaki's government may need to give him credit from time to time, but I do not hear anyone giving Moi credit for anything. Do you know any Kenyan who realises that the country turned a corner not in 2002 but in 1997? I don't.

P.S Hegel speaks of an invisible hand( of the market). Civil society he says has its limitations because it is based on the mechanism of this invisible hand (like Adam Smith's), i.e the individual agent (the particular) and the invisible hand ( the universal). Unity then is not a freedom but a necessity since it is only via compulsion that particular interests conform to universality. So as we strive after our selfish ends, we find that our wants are interwoven with those of others and that we can accomplish nothing without reference to others.

It is this struggle, for the ultimate compromise, that informs the opposition to any government. Kibaki is definitely offending many Kenyans who either have failed hopes in him or who feel that someone else would do a better job. In their demands for better service, in their unreasonable criticism and their loud moaning is found the spur that drives Kibaki's government closer to a compromise and away from the pursuit of its own selfish ends.

Otero,
I find it risible to claim that criticism of the government equals not supporting it. Yours my friend seems to be a misplaced patriotism, well like all patriotism I guess.

Which do we think is easier to achieve, an end to corruption in government or corruption in wider, more desperate society? Do we understand why policemen extort money from wananchi or why wananchi give in? If things were sorted out at the top would this not be diminished?

P.S Great article!!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re: faux enlightenment
written by That Kenyan Loser , April 29, 2007
What to say? Could the analogies be more anachronistic? Kibaki is compared to a father!!

Mr. Opoti, please. Take a look at this again: "I agreed. But isn't a country like a household with the president as the head? Can a father be expected to patrol alone every spot in the homestead to check for broken fences? Should his daughters wait for him to discover their bedroom's leaking roof?"

Where in this analogy do I mention Kibaki? If I did, it wouldn't be an analogy.

All government must be held to account, and kept on their toes perpetually. Okong'os article clearly shows that the Kibaki administration has done a lot wrong.

So why then are you accusing me of advocating for the government? What I meant to say was that let's criticize the government when it's wrong and praise it when it faulters.

I disagree with extremist statements that you can either praise or condemn the government. Why can't we do both? It is obvious that you are a diehard opposion supporter. What happens when that side becomes the government? Do you become a staunch backer or stay on the opposite side? Either one of those choices does disservice to your country.
a sitting President owes the citizens for whom he handles the powers of state.

And the citizens owe their country the duty of assisting him/her in doing the job. Once again, what I'm asking fundamentalists on both sides and moderates to do is to go back to the feel-good period after Kibaki was sworn in when they rose up and PARTICIPATED in denouncing corruption.
Really, you would have done far better to disabuse him of the slanderous lie that the Gikuyu are innately corrupt.

RIDICULOUSLY -- and I'm sure MALICIOUSLY-- taken out of context! I don't know how to respond to this without attacking you personally, something I'm ethical enough to refrain from, Mr. Opoti. Stating that by using a quote attributed to someone amounts to me lying about how corrupt Kikuyus are, is libelous ("slander" is when such a statement is spoken, not written).

Your statement contradicts your contention that I'm a Kibaki supporter.

Okong'o
P.S: I responded without dealing you a low blow. Maybe that's possible.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re:
written by That Kenyan Loser , April 29, 2007
And on Okong'o's last sentence:
Patience is one of the most important African vices, not values. What Africa needs in order to develop, is a bit more impatience of her people. They have been patient, waiting and suffering for too long.

With all due respect, I disagree with you that patience is a vice. Sitting around waiting for the government to do everything for you is not patience, my friend. Governments never have and never will. At least not willingly.

I agree with you and others that leaders have to be pushed to do what they were elected to do. Where we differ is in the belief that people have to oppose everything the government does. What's alarming is the tendency of people to label others government supporters for the mere act of commending it.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
missing Kamale!
written by emmo opoti , April 30, 2007
Now, now. Relax Mr. Okong'o. First off, the analogy I declared anachronistic was the one that declared that the president is like the father. Surely you will forgive my error, Kibaki is after all the President. The statements seems to me to hark back to the times when Kenyatta was founding father of the nation, or Moi was Baba wa Taifa. I hope no one talks like that anymore!
Now I am not sure I am an extremist, but I certainly think criticising a government is much more useful than praising it. If Kibaki was a good President he would simply be doing his job, which he is well rewarded for. I am not sure that a man his age appreciates cheering, no matter how loud. Criticism on the other hand is useful for it draws attention to failing, and in that way puts an end to it or ensures that it is not likely repeated. This is in fact how we learn our morality, the things people complain about the most we try not to do.Given that most voters are not particularly informed, attention must be called to the government whenever it fails its citizens.

Okong'os article clearly shows that the Kibaki administration has done a lot wrong. So why not criticise it, and no as much as the tout has a moral obligation not to be corrupt it is nowhere near the level of responsibility that a sitting President owes the citizens for whom he handles the powers of state.

Opposing the government is not such a harmful thing. Like my quote from Hegel shows, all society benefits from it in the end. Whenever people have been gathered appreciating the good work of any government, it has gone on to betray them. Remember that Moi and Kibaki and Kenyatta all came to power very popular men with titanic-fulls of goodwill.
Kenyans generally departed from that feel good period because they realised that it was a lie. They were let down and ran away. Do you expect Makau Mutua for example, or Willy Mutunga or James Orengo to be support the government. Why should Kenyans assist Kibaki in his work? And how exactly? Most of us are jsut trying to get by ourselves. Maybe we are under the illusion that working hard and obeying the law is all that is required of us?
Now about my alleged malice. Really relax. There is a notion common among Kenyans as your article shows that the Kikuyu are corrupt. I am not suggesting that this lie originates with you. All I meant by my statement was that rather than ask a poor manamba how he is contributing to the efforts of State House against corruption, you would have been pointing out to him that being a Kikuyu has nothing to do with being corrupt. I suppose you have license to translate that as you wish, but in my book that would have been the emergency.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
good going
written by Amir Ibrahim , April 30, 2007
Let's just establish that the opposite of criticise is not support. One can be a very shrill critic of the government and still support it.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by emmo opoti , April 30, 2007
Sure Amir. That seems to me the whole point.

Okong'o
w.r.t your next post. No, really I hear many people praising Kibaki for all manner of reforms. Very few if any ever have a kind word for Moi who started almost every last reform that the Kibaki government will carry to its prospectus at the next election.
Please read Stephen Wanyama's article on Why he would not vote for Kibaki. Now I know Wanyama and he does not support the opposition either. Many Kenyans are like that, I find it hard to see why a reasonable person would take either of these two paths, much better to stay neutral and leave voting to the wananchi.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re:
written by That Kenyan Loser , April 30, 2007
On your softly, softly approach to government. As I have asked of others before, was this also your reaction to Moi? To Kenyatta? For a fact those who are relentless in their criticism of Kibaki's government may need to give him credit from time to time, but I do not hear anyone giving Moi credit for anything. Do you know any Kenyan who realises that the country turned a corner not in 2002 but in 1997? I don't.

You are not saying that if you haven't heard it, it didn't happened, are you? It's hard to find good in Kenyatta (and Moi in his first 14 years) because in they were not elected by the people.

Where could our country be if Moi had declared martial law, as other dictators have in the past, in response to the campaign for multipartism? Whether it was out of fear that such a decree would not work, he made a great choice and for that deserves credit. Moi also warrants kudos for handing over power peacefully.

So as we strive after our selfish ends, we find that our wants are interwoven with those of others and that we can accomplish nothing without reference to others.

That's the message of civic duty I'm attempting to convey here.
Kibaki is definitely offending many Kenyans who either have failed hopes in him or who feel that someone else would do a better job.

Absolutely agree. I was very upbeat in 2002. four years later, I'm defeated, disappointed. If you knew what this government has done to me personally, you'd understand, but I'm not going to address that now.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re:
written by Jotero , April 30, 2007
Opoti
I find it hard to see why a reasonable person would take either of these two paths, much better to stay neutral and leave voting to the wananchi.


We should avoid elitism and embrace the equality of citizens or "wananchi". Wananchi are not some lower life form we are all wananchi and our most basic responsibility in a democracy is to vote.

Egalitarianism is the basis of democracy and the underpinning of all civic responsibility. Civic responsibility is an essential component of a democratic system.

whereas criticism of the government or society in general when it goes a stray is part of civic duty. There is a corresponding part which is support for the government when it does right.

What I have observed and what you advocate is an over reliance on criticism as a way of influencing government. Indeed you dismiss what the government does right as merely doing its job and not worthy of mention or praise.

Support is as much a driving factor in human actions as is criticism. We must reinforce those government actions that we like by expressing support and criticize that with which we disagree.

By the way how do you misplace patriotism that seems to be a rather inane comment. Criticism of the government that I was referring to is the most common that which tends to be unfair, unhealthy and in many instances based on unrealistic expectations.

Opoti asked what we can do to help the government? Surely there are a million things don't bribe, tackle those problems within your reach. If Wangari Maathai had restricted herself to criticizing the government for not planting enough trees it is doubtful that she would have had the same effect on the environment that she has had to date.

Going back to an earlier comment by


Why for example should the government deal with the clashes in Mt. Elgon if there'll be an Otero and an Okong'o suggesting that the blame for the chaos is not the government's but that of the people of that region?


Governments are instituted to tackle societies problems many of which are the product of society and not necessarily the government.

We don't have to blame the government for a problem in order to elicit government action. If we have a problem with teen pregnancy we don't have to blame the government for impregnating the girls in order to get government to address the problem.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re: missing Kamale!
written by That Kenyan Loser , April 30, 2007
Now, now. Relax Mr. Okong'o. First off, the analogy I declared anachronistic was the one that declared that the president is like the father. Surely you will forgive my error, Kibaki is after all the President.

Mr. Opoti,
By implying that I'm asking Kenyans to call Kibaki or any president a father, you are assuming that all fathers are good. "Father" here means the head of the household, and nothing more. You know as well as I do that a father might be a snake, but he is still the father by the mere fact that he heads the family. That's the context of my analogy, so please do not misconstrue it.
All I meant by my statement was that rather than ask a poor manamba how he is contributing to the efforts of State House against corruption, you would have been pointing out to him that being a Kikuyu has nothing to do with being corrupt. I suppose you have license to translate that as you wish, but in my book that would have been the emergency.

That I didn't mention my reaction to the man's claim that Kikuyus are corrupt doesn't mean I didn't challenge him. I left out that part of the conversation because it wasn't relevant to the theme of my article. Read it again.

Did I say that the man was a manamba? Even if he was, doesn't his say as a citizen count? To state that a poor mwananchi can't contribute ideas towards the development of his country is not only fallacious, but also --as Otero pointed above -- elitist.

It reminds me of Britain during the Anglican Church reign, when only the rich could vote for Members of Parliament.

The new crop of leaders, as I understand, is committed to democracy. Saying that a college degree and wealth mean that the bearer knows everything-- that a manamba should just follow because he is poor--contradicts that commitment.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by mosaisi , May 01, 2007
We live in a 'once-after-every-five-years' democracy. We all remember our civic duty after 5 years.

We are also a people who eat and sleep politics. All solutions have to come out of politics. Ombuya's was an attempt to show us the other side of Kenya. I disagree with Ombuya on his call that we have more patience but overall his was a good reminder.

We cannot end corruption if we: bribe cops to evade a small fine; bribe the clerk at the tea buying center to steal from others and allocate to us; bribe the parking meter attendant to 'save' sh. 10 etc.

We are quick to see others as corrupt while we ignore our own corrupt tendencies. That is why we call for eradication of corruption at the top while ignoring corruption at the bottom. Corruption is corruption. The 'top corruption' is an indication of a corrupt society.

If you look at our so called heroes' past, you will see that we don't mind corruption at the top.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re:
written by That Kenyan Loser , May 01, 2007
Ombuya's was an attempt to show us the other side of Kenya. I disagree with Ombuya on his call that we have more patience but overall his was a good reminder.

Mosaisi,
I appreciate you disagreeing in a very civil manner.

Thanks
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Phew
written by Mikology , May 14, 2007
With due respect to all the view shared above, reading some of the opinions, i actually felt like i was reading something out of a Phd. paper.

My two cents is that as Kenyans (and unlike Tanzanians) we have not reached the level where we recognise ourselves as Kenyans our first affiliation is to our tribes.

We expect change to come from the top and we easily forget. We scream about Anglo Leasing yet pay our way out of traffic offences. We elect people who less than a decade back abused their political offices and whose actions led to loss of Kenyan lives.

We are ruled by the same clique over and over again. Where are the leaders of tommorrow? Its easy to find them.....Check the blogs, the newspaper and even at any social gathering where politics is discussed, our opinions are based on tribes not principles. We easily label each others because they come from tribe X or Y.

When will we stop excusing abuse of office and corruption because the culprit is "one of our own".

When shall vote for the likes of Wangari Maathai and Joe Donde and let this old club of Have beens go home to rest.

When shall we be Kenyans Standing tall and proud, not Tribes playing the numbers game to see who comes next to rape our beloved country.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Write comment

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
Last Updated ( Monday, 30 April 2007 )
 
< Prev   Next >


Archives | About Us | KenyaImagine How To | Privacy Policy | ContactUs | Join KenyaImagine |  Advertise Here| Legal Disclaimer | Terms & Conditions | Directory
rss-2.png

 

Copyright 2009 KenyaImagine.com, the KenyaImagine logo and KenyaImagine.com are trademarks of  The Imagine Company