Bosibori Ndemo's article of the 19th of February got
me thinking about the reality of HIV-AIDS and the power of the media in shaping
our perceptions on disease.
The dominant view is that the high prevalence rates in Africa are caused by the nature of sexual behaviour there.
This view excludes other important factors such as poverty and biological factors.
However only the most prejudiced would choose to ignore the fact that HIV has
only a 1% prevalence rate in permissive American society, but reaches a high 25% in sexually-conservative Africa. Partner exchange rates and unprotected sex have
no reason to be higher in Africa than anywhere
else. The charge that it is sexual behaviour that sets African infection rates
apart has not been made, but it is implicit in an HIV combat strategy that has
the ABC doctrine at its core.
Underlying this approach is a notion of racial difference,
based not on scientific study but on racialised arguments that treat the
African as possessing distinct sexual qualities; hyper-sexualised and
promiscuous. The racialised arguments do not though explain the fact that mainly black Cuba has
an incidence rate that is 1000th that of Botswana, or why epidemics
of other sexually transmitted conditions like Chlamydia, Herpes or teen pregnancies
exist in the West.
It also does not explain why African AIDS is not gay like it
in the West. With regard to this, the ideas of Thabo Mbeki dismissed as
belonging to fringe lunacy beg several questions that the governing narrative
fails to answer. There are clearly other factors at play, like with other
diseases. Foremost among these, are poverty, endemic malnutrition, poor
sanitary and sewage conditions, poor access to healthcare and medicines, whichÂ
powerful factors are often ignored.
The fact that these environmental conditions are pervasive in communities
that are highly susceptible to HIV shows a greater significance than any
imagined correlation between sexual behaviour and race.
Caricatures of South Africa's Health Minister Manto Tshabalala-Msimang
and
the stance of her government's insistence on nutrition are common place in
discussions of HIV. What these caricatures do not capture of her views, is that while it is important to insist that AIDS is not a
nutritional condition, nutrition is clearly an important factor in the health
of populations affected by HIV. The massive drop in food production in Africa due to extreme weather conditions (droughts and
floods) resulted in a collapse in incomes and migrations to the city as subsistence
farming became undependable. Set alongside the collapse in overall spending on
health programs this drop in calorie and protein intake led to a plunge in
overall immunity. It is also important to remember that unlike temperate zones,
tropical Africa is already ridden with
parasites and other disease causing organisms. Nutritional and health care
deficiencies work hand in hand to make the body more susceptible to infection. For
example, Vitamin A deficiency renders skin and mucous membranes weaker and more
open to the breakage that allows viral entry.
Parasite infestation on the other
hand, worsens immunity both as the body is depleted of energy in fighting
infections off and also as it results in an almost chronic triggering of the
immune system. At the same time self-treating and skimping on medical treatment
lead to an underlying presence of untreated ailments like genital ulcers
further easing infection.
The danger in presenting HIV/AIDS as a behavioral phenomenon
is clearest in the fact that it takes attention from the reality that most
sexual encounters are either unplanned or experienced in the absence of
complete mental awareness. It also discounts the fact that sexual intercourse
has a thrill factor attached to it which is obstructed by the use of condoms.
Pushing condom use and abstinence as the mainstay of
prevention strategy seems foolish considering also that many sexual encounters involve
powerless parties or lovers persuaded to trust ‘I am clean' or the fact that
HIV test are not 100% foolproof.
More effective would be a campaign to improve overall healthcare
and nutrition across Africa especially among
those most enervated by unemployment, rural urban migration, prostitution as a
sole source of income, malaria, pneumonia or tuberculosis.
|
But as to the rest: sincere compliments!
Alexander