|
Written by Open Thread
|
|
Monday, 04 August 2008 |
If you see some part of an apple but not every part of the apple, then you see not an apple but only part of an apple.
Since no one ever sees every part of an apple, no one ever sees an apple. The argument isn't restricted to apples. Peaches, pears, plums, cars, books, and people - no one ever sees them. Indeed, no one ever sees anything. What is wrong with this argument?
___________________
(See p. 100 of Jay F. Rosenberg (1984). The Practice of Philosophy . NJ: Prentice-Hall.)
|
Open Thread |
| About the author: |
| Please send the editors an email at
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
on suggestions for topics on Open Thread. |
Trackback(0)
|
|
Last Updated ( Monday, 04 August 2008 )
|