Rethinking Feminism PDF  | Print |  E-mail
Written by Nanjala Nyabola   
Saturday, 01 March 2008 00:35
A couple of years ago a friend of mine had a debate about the right to dress a certain way. Being relatively conservative, I was of the position that women (and men) had a responsibility to dress in such a way that they would not "provoke" negative reactions from the wider society.

 

My friend thought that actually people should be able to dress however they want. The question was not resolved but has been a running theme in the back of my mind since I came to England. For you see, my jeans and knee length skirts have confined me to fuddy duddy status here; fitting micromini denim jeans, or itsy bitsy shorts over thick black tights are de rigueur here, and my refusal to wear them makes me unpopular, not to mention unfashionable. It all came to a head recently when I was engaged in a debate about feminism which began along the same lines. I stated, unashamedly, that I was not a feminist, in so far as being a feminist meant the right to over sexualise my clothes, my speech, my demeanour. You could have heard a pin drop. Me, the only African in the room and a woman at that, how could I not be a feminist when feminism has done so much for African women? But what has feminism actually done for African women? It strikes me that the term is bandied about to cover a multitude of evils and sometimes to the detriment of those women that it seeks to protect.

On one hand you have a societal malfunction. In politics, we talk of Politics (capital P) - government, the state, political parties etc - and politics (little p) - power relationships that govern everyday society. My argument is that feminism hasn't done much for African women because it continues to fight for representation in Politics with little regard for the politics of being an African woman. We bemoan the under-representation of women in parliament without investigating the social structures and systems that make it difficult for women even to consider going into or succeeding in Politics. Think about the lukewarm reception Wangari Maathai received on her return to Kenya after winning the Nobel Prize, because of a domestic scandal in the 1980's. We can tolerate women in Politics as long as they don't aspire to be more than second fiddle to a Big Man, a side kick. Sample the current situation - Julia Ojiambo, Martha Karua, Sally Kosgei, Lina Jebii Kilimo - all highly intelligent, educated, women but confined to side-kick status. One would think that 51% of the population of Kenya had nothing to say or do in the current stalemate except be a victim of the actions of men. I stress at this point that this is in no way an endorsement of some of the politics that these women practice. But, as I said to another friend of mine, although I disagree with everything that Condoleeza Rice stands for politically, the mere fact of her existence in the position of Secretary of State has opened up doors for Black women in the US - more so than any affirmative action programme.

On the other hand, you have the disconnect between Euro-centric feminism and the African woman. Like all other elements of politics, the development of feminism as a theoretical approach has, in my opinion ignored and undermined the position of the African woman. To my contemporaries at the University, I am forced to continually state that I will not fight for the right to wear a miniskirt and stroll down the street blind drunk at 1:30 a.m. before all the women in my country can go into hospital to give birth without fear of dying, or girls can at least have the choice to go to school or not. It is a position that has won me many critics, who argue that true liberation for women did begin in Europe but then spread to Africa, and the victories that women have won in the board room in Europe are having a positive effect on women in Africa. I'm yet to be completely convinced. I believe that the victories of the European woman have made it slightly more difficult for the African woman, if for no other reason because like other dominant paradigms, it seeks to standardise rather than celebrate the diversity of women. To put it simply, if a woman wants a highly successful and well paid career, to travel around the world but at some point to walk away from it all and have children, preferably with a (well trained ;-)) husband in tow, it is almost in direct contravention of the position advocated by the status quo.

Feminism today is - like realism, neo-liberalism and other positions - for the most part an exclusive discourse between men and European/Western women. And it's not just African women who are excluded from this discourse, or rather pummelled by its participants. Muslim women also find themselves viewed as sell outs for their refusal to standardise or close ranks with either side of the debate. Women in poverty in general are constantly being dictated to and told what to think and when, with little regard for their own opinions. In my opinion this is the great feminist tragedy. We need to get back to basics - fight for the right of women to exist as equals, to make informed lifestyle choices. I believe that there is definitely a problem that needs addressing, but perhaps the dominant brand of feminism is not the tool with which to do so.


Written on Saturday, 01 March 2008 00:35 by Nanjala Nyabola

Viewed 1941 times so far. Like this? Tweet it to your followers!

Latest articles from Nanjala Nyabola

Latest 'tweets' from the imagine company

  • Nancy Jebet takes the gold in the 1500m women's finals. #AfricanAthleticsChampionshipsLinkFriday, 30 July 2010 14:41

Trackback(0)
Comments (31)add
 1 2 > 
0
a thought
written by mkosakabila , March 01, 2008
"Women in poverty in general are constantly being dictated to and told what to think and when, with little regard for their own opinions."

..and they are being told that by EVERYONE. Those who claim to advocate for them, as those who perpetuate the social structures that subordinate them.

Though, I often wonder just how much of that subordination is unconsciously self-inflicted. How do we socialize our male (and female) children? How do we react to females who have adopted 'unconventional' roles in society?

Nanjala's account resonates. There is a strong case for equality of opportunity and self-determination across the (two?) genders.

Someone once said that education of females is about the most powerful birth control pill. It might yet be helpful for breaking those structures of domination and subordination of women that are so prevalent in many societies in Africa. Some way to 'de-colonize' the mind?

I have absolutely no experience on gender issues, but just a thought, especially since its doubtful that the beneficiaries of such domination are the most likely to seek to end it.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
big disagree
written by Daniel.Waweru , March 01, 2008
Your friends have a point. There's no right to dress immodestly; but feminists are correct to insist that they have a right not to have modes of dress prescribed to them, and especially not by men. That a freedom might be misused is no reason to give it up.

But what has feminism actually done for African women?

Compare school enrollments in Kenya in 1960 and school enrollments now; consider the gender composition of elites in 1960 and now. At both the top and bottom ends, there are far more women now, in absolute and relative numbers, than there were in 1960. That's due (at least partly) to the influence of Euro-American feminism.

How? Money and ideological justification. It is no accident that the seed money for Kianda came from a German NGO, or that Starehe Girls' has so many foreign donors. Ideological justification because Western feminist thought has provided a set of readily-accepted (by power) arguments for a generally-desirable goal. That's not to say that Kenyans (or Africans) in colonial or pre-colonial times lacked any conception of gender egalitarianism, or that women didn't hold power then: Harry Thuku protested colonial-ear forced labour for women inthe 20's; Asante was significantly matriarchal. The emphasis on female education (and the eradication of FGM) takes care of the claim that Western feminists have been too little interested in politics without the cap.

And. Ms. Karua and Ms. Kosgei have power in their own right; they're not sidekicks.

Gender equality is a self-evident good. I'm no fan of NGOs, but this is one area where they have earned our thanks. That western ideas of gender equality, and strategies to achieve it, are (sometimes) insensititive to the experience of African women is no reason to give up on the principle, or the help of Western allies; it's a reason to jojnthem in finding a way to make it work for African women.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by aeichener , March 01, 2008
Being relatively conservative, I was of the position that women (and men) had a responsibility to dress in such a way that they would not "provoke" negative reactions from the wider society.


Very bimboesque.

You have not changed much since then.

Alexander
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re:
written by politicalscientist , March 01, 2008


Very bimboesque.

You have not changed much since then.

Alexander


I don't understand your comment. Please clarify before I respond.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
What have women done with femi
written by Keguro , March 02, 2008
I vividly remember 1985, the year women across the world converged in Nairobi. Before then, I had no notion that something called "feminism" existed nor that the women in my family had a stake in it, considered patriarchy to be a problem, understood, in great detail, the male-led structure of Kenya, a structure that ran from playgrounds to government offices.

I begin this way to raise what, I think, is a more fruitful way to consider the relationship between "African women" and "feminism." I have never understood feminism to be distinct from the women who, in their various ways and through various means, seek to improve their lives and challenge patriarchy. To be sure, this happens differently, depending on location, educational attainment, venue, and aims. There is no such thing as a singular feminism.

To ask, then, what women have done with "feminisms," is to return agency to the site where it matters most: to women. I would caution against any easy reading that seeks to disembed feminism from women's work, women's lives, women's activism, and sees it, instead, as an abstract and "western" institution. To my mind that's a dangerous misreading that rejects what it cannot or will not value.

I would also say that aligning feminism with wearing mini-skirts is a too-easy strawman that reduces the complexity of feminism's rich critiques of patriarchy, capitalism, and social injustice to the right to dress like a Spice Girl.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Rethinking Feminism
written by yepandyep , March 02, 2008
The first time I heard of feminists was when they took to the streets of London to burn bras, so it is something about what women wear. The other day I was in a church and thinking the minister was a man, but later it turned out she was female. She was making every effort to be manlike, why? I suggest she was ashamed of being female. Then there is the ladette group of women who appear on TV game shows to be put in competition with each other to become the most girly female. So has feminism really set women free from their constraints in the west. A lot of women are unhappy with the hours they must work, the hours the children attend daycare, the grandparents are looking after second families as they seek to care for their grandchildren, women are having children unsupported by their mate, these children grow up on the state handouts and suffer mental health and social problems in increasing numbers. The building trade is doing well though, as they build ever more flats for single occupancy as people are no longer willing to live together. The UK will sink with the weight of concrete being poured into the ground. Most people would perfer to live in a house and have a garden for their flowers.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Amina , March 02, 2008
The idea that feminism dictates that women should wear less is quite backward. That we think women "burnt bras" to express what to wear shows that still very few understand feminism. At its core feminism advocates for women's rights as human rights. It's that simple. Period. This right Nanjala allows for you to dress as conservatively as you please, as it allows your friends to dress in mini-skirts and tights as they please. This same right will not put the onus of sexuality on women ( as in it is Eve who ate the fruit!) Once you recognize women's rights, then as you rightly say Nanjala, women in Kenya will have the right to good health, education, et al.

I stated, unashamedly, that I was not a feminist, in so far as being a feminist meant the right to over sexualise my clothes, my speech, my demeanour.
Whoever said this was feminism?

I will agree with you on the disconnect between Western women and African women for their fights are different. While an American woman battles the elusive glass ceiling, an African woman battles blatant sexual harassment every single day in a myriad of ways. This does not mean that our interests are different and that we cannot work together.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Bra-burning Myth
written by Amina , March 02, 2008
One more thing, there never was a literal burning of bras, or stripping of bras by women. At that time, women were demonstrating against the sexual objectification of women. Beauty pageants were also a target as they sexualized women and created a standard of beauty for women. Hmm, how little has changed in this regard!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by politicalscientist , March 02, 2008
To everyone else, I guess my point in the article was not whether or not women have the right to dress or not dress a certain way but to highlight the fact that women in the Developing world are being excluded from a discourse that has affects their lives in so many ways. It never ceases to amaze me at how feminism in Europe has become synonymous with women following a certain trajectory in their lives, and the criticms that is heaped down on women who choose not to go down that road. And the key thing there is choice.

Oversexualisation of women is a form of oppression in my view; that to be "sexy" you have to dress a certain way (even if its -3 degrees outside) and conduct yourself in a certain fashion. And while I respect the right of any woman to choose to do so I also question a movement in which there is little room for diversity. In many of the debates I've had about Islam you always get people who bring up different aspects of Muslim women being oppressed. And while it may be true that there are several Muslim women who are oppressed there are also Christian, atheist, agnostic, Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist..etc.. women who are equally oppressed. Its about choice, for me feminism is failing African women because it fails to give many of them that choice. You end up in a situation where on one hand a patriachal society determined to keep you down and on the other a "liberation" movement that wants you to reject everything that is familiar wholesale. I guess I'd like to see the kind of feminism where all men arent the enemy but can be brought into the process of liberating women from social, economic and political inequality.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Intra-feminist debates
written by aeichener , March 02, 2008
The idea that feminism dictates that women should wear less is quite backward. That we think women "burnt bras" to express what to wear shows that still very few understand feminism. At its core feminism advocates for women's rights as human rights. It's that simple. Period.


You are very right, Amina. This - incidentally - also allows for an intra-feminist conflict of values, if you will so, e.g. within the context of the present (and mainly European) discussion about the right of muslimatun be cover themselves (meaning headscarf at least, possibly veil) also within certain "public spaces".

You know the ongoing Turkish clash of laicism vs. the (aggressive) display of fundamentalist religiosity. In other European countries, it is asked whether a public servant who be a muslim or muslima, be allowed to wear his specific headdress when serving the public.

England has also the rather special case of Sikhs ("imperial forces' privilege"), but the issue is hotly debated also among muslimatun. Some of these women feel that the right to obey the tenets of their religion (as they understand it) is a fundamental issue of feminism as well, because it involves human rights for women (vide Feridun Zaimoglu's play "Black Virgins" for an outspoken expression of this stance; FZ has created feisty young "in-ya-face" muslimatun as protagonists, not obsequious docile females).

Other muslimatun argue - also not without reason - that the "veil" (standing exemplarily for head & hair coverage in general) is a symbol for the ongoing patriarchal oppression of women under the mere guise of islam, and for an imbalanced society, and that the state should not tolerate the prtomotion of such ideology within state-controled and state-dominated space (as opposed to private space, and general traffic). They also have a good point.

Alexander
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
What Feminism?
written by Keguro , March 02, 2008
I'm still struggling to understand what kind of role the term "feminism" is playing in this article and in subsequent comments. To read it, one would assume there has not been a vibrant, continent-wide feminism for at least 30 years!

If the discussion is about the politics of clothing, then let it be that, without reducing feminism to such politics. In which case, there are many extensive studies about women and clothing, about the conflicted and complex role of the veil and veiling, and about wearing western-style clothes.

Many of these discussions are by feminists and foreground feminism, many others are not (I think here of Malek Alloula's Colonial Harem as opposed to Jean Allman's self-consciously feminist anthologyFashioning Africa.) Now, while I certainly don't think online forums are the place to ask for citations, I would be much happier if some of the reductive claims made about "feminism" had some material basis, some empirical evidence. Are we really willing to dismiss scholars like Amina Mama, Nakanyike Musisi, and Wanjiku Kabira?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
feminism as politics
written by Daniel.Waweru , March 02, 2008
Keguro,

I'm still struggling to understand what kind of role the term "feminism" is playing in this article and in subsequent comments.


Najala's piece alleges a clash between (i) feminism (as ideology) and the history and present reality of African women, and (ii) feminism as ideology and the personal freedom of individual (dissenting) women. The clothing issue was intended to dramatise the point. Unsuccessfully, I think.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by politicalscientist , March 02, 2008
Daniel, once again you've forced me to concede a point. I was extrapolating some debates that I'd had in my political science classes to Kenya Imagine and in the process failed to adjust the message sufficiently to suit the expanded audeience. Thanks for the heads up. The message remains the same, there is a disconnect between what's happening in "feminist circles" in Europe and in Africa but I should have explained my example better.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Not monolithic
written by Amina , March 02, 2008
Nanjala, this is probably a little bit the point but have you ever seen the structure of the democratic party members in most of theses states? http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/
Hillary Clinton should have had a walk over. Stroll in the park. The mystery of the female vote.
What, if you please, is the mystery of the female vote?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re: big disagree
written by aeichener , March 02, 2008
There's no right to dress immodestly; but feminists are correct to insist that they have a right not to have modes of dress prescribed to them, and especially not by men.


Yeah. There is "no right to dress immodestly" in the same sense as there is no "right" to dress modestly.

Daniel has said it subsequently:
There is a right to dress as you will however, and not as someone else wills it. The "else" embraces both backward moralist bigots (hello Nanjala) and consumption terrorists (medially mediated pressure to conform to certain clothing styles, see Keguro's quick slap at them).

Alexander
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re: re: big disagree
written by politicalscientist , March 02, 2008

Yeah. There is "no right to dress immodestly" in the same sense as there is no "right" to dress modestly.

Daniel has said it subsequently:
There is a right to dress as you will however, and not as someone else wills it. The "else" embraces both backward moralist bigots (hello Nanjala) and consumption terrorists (medially mediated pressure to conform to certain clothing styles, see Keguro's quick slap at them).

Alexander


Ok cool now, I understand your position. Its very easy to pick out people who don't read the articles before they respond by their responses to the content and failure to pick out the salient points of your argument. I guess reading is an art and like most arts either you have the talent for it or you don't.

The Editors have already rapped alot of people, myself included on the purpose of this website. Not to insult, not to dictate but to present different sides of different arguments and to try and work on a way forward. I hope that this is my last word on this topic; it takes a very, very small man indeed to respond to a debate with personal insults. See if you can spot the double entendre...
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Last Paragraph
written by Baby-girl , March 02, 2008
I agree with that conclusion.

I will ruffle some feathers here by stating that Martha Karua is no face of feminism; she is but an arrogant human being with limited skills on effective communication. Matter of fact, she is a poor leader and it has nothing to do with Gender.

The liberation of the African woman, as I have said before will be achieved by participation of her husband, brother, father and male relations.

Men do know when they are being jerks, but they have a different mode of communication. It is this region that we should seek to utilize.

Truth is, there are some female roles that can not be ignored.
I personally argue that these roles be valued as much as the other human roles.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re: big disagree
written by politicalscientist , March 02, 2008
Compare school enrollments in Kenya in 1960 and school enrollments now; consider the gender composition of elites in 1960 and now. At both the top and bottom ends, there are far more women now, in absolute and relative numbers, than there were in 1960. That's due (at least partly) to the influence of Euro-American feminism.

Ideological justification because Western feminist thought has provided a set of readily-accepted (by power) arguments for a generally-desirable goal. That's not to say that Kenyans (or Africans) in colonial or pre-colonial times lacked any conception of gender egalitarianism, or that women didn't hold power then: Harry Thuku protested colonial-ear forced labour for women inthe 20's; Asante was significantly matriarchal. The emphasis on female education (and the eradication of FGM) takes care of the claim that Western feminists have been too little interested in politics without the cap.

And. Ms. Karua and Ms. Kosgei have power in their own right; they're not sidekicks.

Gender equality is a self-evident good. I'm no fan of NGOs, but this is one area where they have earned our thanks. That western ideas of gender equality, and strategies to achieve it, are (sometimes) insensititive to the experience of African women is no reason to give up on the principle, or the help of Western allies; it's a reason to jojnthem in finding a way to make it work for African women.


I apologise on the basis that if I had known I would be penalised for citations I would have put some in. Can I take issue with this position on the basis of an example? Recently a female student recently ran for Union president in a University in Kenya and for all her troubles was beaten up by a group of male colleagues who argued that it was impossible for a woman to be in charge of a students organsation. The response of the establishment was to suggest that she suspend her studies for 90 days while the investigate the matter, given that they could not guarantee that the ruling would come down on her favour on the other side, she was forced to give up the fight and focus on her degree. The politics of women in Politics...

The work of NGOs is separate from the different positions that are being pushed on the feminist ideological agenda. Look at the recent nomination process for the major political parties. What I've read in several articles from this end is that it they were flawed because of the poor representation of women. In my view, they were flawed on two counts. On one level it is ridiculous that both major political parties had to work so hard to find suitable female nominees but on the other hand, it is equally ridiculous that women should be put in their positions just because they are women. Having breasts and a vagina is not a disability.

What I'm saying, like you've said somewhere else Daniel, is that we need to address the structures that conspire, from the moment a girl is born in Kenya to the moment she dies, to keep her out of certain realms where she has just as much ability and skills as a man. The trouble is Euro centric feminism focuses on battles that are easily won or completely irrelevant - like modes of dress - instead of looking at the bigger war.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re: big disagree
written by Paul Kimani , March 02, 2008

Starehe Girls' has so many foreign donors.

While I"m not absolutely sure about this, Starehe girls is probably based on the same tenets that Starehe boys is based on in that it pairs poor high achievers with foreign sponsors, who pay their way through. In that sense, it came about 40 years late but better late than never.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
51%
written by Paul Kimani , March 02, 2008
Nanjala, this is probably a little bit the point but have you ever seen the structure of the democratic party members in most of theses states?
Link here
Hillary Clinton should have had a walk over. Stroll in the park. The mystery of the female vote.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re: Not monolithic
written by Paul Kimani , March 03, 2008
What, if you please, is the mystery of the female vote?


Not really a mystery but if you look at most of the states, there are quite a number with 57% female voters and only 44 % male votes, yet Hillary can,t catch a break. It seams politics is not really the game of numbers.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Women, Feminism, Inequality
written by Keguro , March 03, 2008
Daniel,

Thanks for the clarification.

That said, I still remain concerned that something known as "eurocentric feminism" is being set up as a strawman, in a way that weakens what is an otherwise persuasive argument. Any consideration of feminism from the late 1970s onward must consider the vital roles of women of color, African women, and lesbians, among others, in challenging dominant white, middle-class feminisms. Here, the names Audre Lorde, bell hooks, Barbara Smith, and Angela Davis, Gloria Anzaldua will have to suffice.

Second, we have to be careful not to equate the fact of women in power with feminist intent. While the rise of women to powerful political positions remains indebted to feminism, it is not, therefore, the case that women in power consider themselves or act as feminists. Exhibit one: Margaret Thatcher.

To view Martha Karua as a feminist because of her gender is quite different from understanding her as feminist because of her own stated positions and political actions.

To what I take to be the meat of your argument: to be effective, feminism needs to be situated, attuned to what Adrienne Rich termed the politics of location, what might be termed the contingencies of its present. Feminist struggles in Africa may be different from those in Europe and the U.S. because of history and context. However, I would say they still share similar aims insofar as they aim to empower women and to critique patriarchy--it need not be said here that critiquing patriarchy has little to do with hating or belittling men.

That feminism in Africa, or what some prefer to term womanism, may be quite unique, there is no disagreement. But, even then, I would caution against reinforcing a west/Africa distinction that, to my mind, has not been tenable since colonialism.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Unspoken sisterhood
written by aeichener , March 04, 2008
There is one aspect - maybe only a side branch, maybe a sidebranch with some beautiful magnolia flowers on it - that I wanted to add to Keguro's very welcome infusions of antidoting intellectual honesty into a hypocritical debate. Biases mixed with sheer abysmal ignorance are not a good breeding gound for enlightenment after all.

When researching the history of black feminism in Kenya, one must absolutely not overlook the seminal and crucial influence that white women had upon its infancy in the 1940s and 1950. A few studies already exist on this (how else would I know), but they remain dispersed and have not yet been interlinked in more theoretical conspect.

What we can see is that in many places there were black women ("natives"smilies/wink.gif and white women (mostly settlers' wives, but also some singles) uniting as allies in unspoken subversion against loosely interlinked patriarchal systems that fettered and contained both of them. At the root of many organizations, groups and institution of Kenyan women's self-help and self-assertion, we find such fostering influences. A slightly dry but astonishingly deep study is e.g. hidden in the collected studies in honour of Gideon Were (ed. William Ochieng').

(Very interesting. A more precise citation would however be appreciated, if possible. May we ask for it? Ed.)

Alexander
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
HATUA TALK SHOW-EQUALITY
written by toni kamau , March 04, 2008
Hi,

Love your article.

I am the producer for a talk show called hatua, and we are filming a topic on gender equality in Kenya on the 4th of April.

We would love to have you as an audience member on the show.

Kindly contact us on thehatuashow@yahoo.com or call 4349280/0727532089 for more details on this exciting talk show!

regards,

Toni,
(Producer, HATUA)

(Hello Toni, thanks for the encouraging feedback. Keguro is a bit far away from Kenya these days (as are several others of the contributors), but do you also do phone (call-out) interviews? Ah. I now found our blurb when we published your previous article, Toni:
"Toni Kamau is the producer for HATUA Season 3; a human rights based talk show hosted by Jimmy Gathu and Anne Mitaru Mumina. Season 2 is currently airing on NTV on Sundays at 6 pm." Ed.)

And, by the way, we also found a splendid and exuberant eulogy on you in "The Nation", Toni Mumbi Kamau. Did its author Tim Kamuzu Banda kiss your shoes at the end of this interview, did you mix grated pangolin scales in his drink as a charm, or how come that this ensorcelled journalist was so smitten with you? ;-) Eds.)
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re: Unspoken sisterhood
written by aeichener , March 05, 2008
(Very interesting. A more precise citation would however be appreciated, if possible. May we ask for it? Ed.)

At your beck and call :-) :

William R. Ochieng' (ed.):
"Historical Studies and Social Change in Western Kenya: Essays in Memory of Professor Gideon S. Were"
2002 Nairobi etc.: East African Educational Publishers, XXII and 406 pp.
(ISBN 9966-25-152-9)
and therein:
Mildred Ndeda: Women and Development Since Colonial Times, ibid., pp. 232-260

Alexander
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
late reply
written by Daniel.Waweru , March 05, 2008
politicalscientist,

No requirement to put citations up; I assumed it was widely known that school enrollments and female literacy have significantly improved. Your example is not decisive: there is still boorish behaviour from men towards women, it isn't proof that feminism has been ineffective. That things could be better doesn't prove that they haven't improved.

The stress that (some) NGOs place on empowering women, is an effect of the ideological successes of the feminist movement elsewhere. The stress that internal NGOs, such as the GBM, place on empowering women is also partly an effect of those victories. (Wangari Maathai's education in the USA, and her subsequent struggles with the patriarchal order have something to do with each other.)

aeichener,

Vielen Dank for the reference.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
new day
written by observer , March 06, 2008
I think that western women are struggling with the fact that along with their freedom come certain dilemmas. I have watched many of them and concluded that there are almost crippled by opportunity. They can be whatever they want to be and many of them want it all however, there are only 24hrs in a day and its impossible to be super mom, super wife and cooperate ladder climber all in a days work. Womens liberation did not just free women form their traditional roles but men too. All these when what men basically want out of life has not changed much.

I see many upwardly mobile Kenyan women starting to deal with this issue.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
More on black feminism
written by aeichener , March 07, 2008
Keguro has said what there is to be said, and that in the most benevolent avuncular simplicity. I might be able to add this or that, but hardly to improve his clarity, so I guess I should not try. Okay, maybe I'll add one name that he of course knows, but who might benefit others readers:

Patricia Hill Collins: Black Sexual Politics, 2005 New York & London: Routledge, IX and 374 pp.

Excellent style, probably too simple for Keguro's own taste and predeliction for sought mannerisms (Hill Collins' lucid discourse is totally devoid of obfuscations, and one will encounter neither Spivakisms, nor Butlerisations), but fine for simple Me.

Alexander
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by J.J. , March 08, 2008
Some posters mention "black" feminism. This is misleading as well. The issues affecting "black" Western women are totally different from those affecting African women.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
More to read and learn
written by aeichener , April 16, 2008
I just came across another excellent link. In order to help your ignorance of feminism in general, and of African feminism in specific, Nanjala Nyabola, let me direct you to the following book:

Politics of the Womb: Women, Reproduction, and the State in Kenya

Here is the publisher's blurb:
"In more than a metaphorical sense, the womb has proven to be an important site of political struggle in and about Africa. By examining the political significance--and complex ramifications--of reproductive controversies in twentieth-century Kenya, this book explores why and how control of female initiation, abortion, childbirth, and premarital pregnancy have been crucial to the exercise of colonial and postcolonial power. This innovative book enriches the study of gender, reproduction, sexuality, and African history by revealing how reproductive controversies challenged long-standing social hierarchies and contributed to the construction of new ones that continue to influence the fraught politics of abortion, birth control, female genital cutting, and HIV/AIDS in Africa."

Alexander
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
 1 2 > 
You can add your comment here

busy
Last Updated on Saturday, 01 March 2008 16:05