Bound to the mast PDF  | Print |  E-mail
Written by Amir Ibrahim   
Wednesday, 16 May 2007 14:30
W When the Anglo-Leasing scandal broke out, in the din that was raised from out of the bowels of Kenya one thing was conspicuous. The silence from its centre.
Similarly, if you were to point out the anti-democratic credentials of the President and his inner circle, or his role in the creation and establishment of the KANU tyranny, the people of Central Kenya would likely rise up in protest. Most people in this part of the country even believe that the misrule of Kenya started in 1978 when Moi became President and not in 1963. Any comment or criticism of the Kibaki or Kenyatta governments, even here on this site is met by sheer hostility from these same quarters. Also, any suggestions of nepotism in public appointments, or of shielding such cousins' from the full effect of the law are met with equal disapproval no matter how factual they may be.

But these attitudes are not limited to grassy knolls and steep slopes of the Central Highlands. Down by the lake, or in the streets of Nairobi is found an equally uncompromising stance towards rebuke of Raila Odinga or ODM-K party pronouncements. Here is taught the myth that Raila was a brave knight who rode into KANU to destroy it from within, a champion of the common people and their self-less defender to the last.

Such mythologies are not in themselves harmful, and neither is the passionate support of a political group. The danger for Kenya comes in the fact that our national destiny is held in the hands of a few men who rule by fiat. These men do not mean well for us, they hurt all of us but they enjoy the impunity which our culture of ukabila and narrow-minded patriotism confers on them. They bask in the knowledge that their every action, even such actions as endanger the whole nation will always be staunchly defended by hordes of ignoramuses ruled by a faith to blood and filial ties.

If these men held up a goat tomorrow, and declared in concert that it should be not our next President, but our next king and their little nations rose in chorus to shout God Save the King, we would all the rest of us be shackled to their whims, hurtling into the great future with our goat king leading the charge. This is true tyranny and the only way we could ever get out of it is by ensuring that no strong leader ever gets to State House. I am not of course speaking of strong in the sense of intelligent, or forceful, or effective; but strong in the sense of a leader who can and will ride unshod over the barbed obstacles of our constitution and courts, one who can thumb his nose at the plurality of public opinion because unthinking lemming hordes will follow him to the very precipice.

Kenya does not need such men, and it is for this reason that the likes of Mwai Kibaki and Raila Odinga are dangerous for our country. This is the reason why we have as a nation grown more polarized during these last four years than at any time since the 1970's. It is why there can be no unity or harmony inside ODM-K, because sadly, so sadly some of us think they are more Kenyan than the rest of us.

Saddest of all, they can make it true.


Written on Wednesday, 16 May 2007 14:30 by Amir Ibrahim

Viewed 1240 times so far. Like this? Tweet it to your followers!

Latest articles from Amir Ibrahim

Latest 'tweets' from the imagine company

  • Nancy Jebet takes the gold in the 1500m women's finals. #AfricanAthleticsChampionshipsLinkFriday, 30 July 2010 14:41

Trackback(0)
Comments (10)add
0
...
written by Stephen Wanyama , May 16, 2007
Nicely done, my good man.

Not to make too fine a point of it, but to realise just how terrible the two party system is, look at the American Presidential election and especially at the recent debate among the Republican canidates.

While Rudy Giuliani and the rest of them kept bleating on and on about hate, and fantasies such as 'Muslims hate us because they hate our freedom', Ron Paul was conspicuously ignored by America. So cartoons like O'Reilly and Hannity and Limbaugh are much more revered than actual thinkers.
There is no debate in America on almost all issues, and where there is debate one of the sides is often so very wrong but at the same time so very supported, even by the majority of the country. When only two views are halal, the truth is bound to get lost in the translation.

Your example about duopolies shows this point exactly. The consumer only benefits when the market is filled with many competing players.

To add to the arguments from above. True democracy is achieved when the voter enjoys choice. Thus even when there are two large parties (like in Germany or Japan for example), the other parties in the system (the small ones ) that is control the system by deciding coalitions. So whilst the system retains the balance inherent in the conservative stances of the traditionally large parties, these parties can only form governments by moderating their positions and including smaller players. In a two-party system on the other hand, the two party positions are so rigid and far apart that there is little competition for core voter groups. This is why elections in some countries (where we are heading) are decided purely on the opinion of a select faction. This culture enforces a need in the parties to either swerve to the extremes and therefore leave an unrepresented centre, or else to steal to the centre, or in the other direction and effectively disenfranchise one's core voters (Tony Blair).

Sorry to re-post this here.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Stephen Wanyama , May 16, 2007
Here is a link to the best of Ron Paul at the event, but Americans like Kenyans do not read. Pearls to swine.
Most amazingly, even golden boys like Obama cannot bring themselves to say this, because America like Kenya has lemmings bound to the mast. Here also is Sen. Gravel formerly of Alaska, as usual ignored by the USA. Earings on pigs.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Timothy Wainaina , May 17, 2007
I am happy to read some sensible stuff here again, was all love and rainbows for a bit there.
I am encouraged that there are Kenyans out there who are truly not tribalistic, and who can recognise both the failures of the Kibaki government and the folly of replacing it with a Raila government.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Kamale , May 17, 2007
It has been suggested that the earliest Kenyans can extricate themselves from this group of wazees and get better leadership is 2012. But then we have to make sure that in 2007 we do not get the likes of Raila and Kalonzo since that will mean that they are perhaps destined to be in power till about 2017/2022 when they will be in their seventies. If that was to happen, then we in the middle group of the forties will be pushed out purely on account of age.

Are we happy to be classified as the generation that lost it out in the power wars of Kenya?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Alexander , May 17, 2007
Which generation of Kenyans did _not_ "lose it out" in the power wars since 1900 ?

It would be time for uhuru, at last, methinks.

Alexander
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by donworry , May 17, 2007
When the several thousand or so potential candidates announce themselves ready for the next election there will be quite a few genuine characters who are not crooks.

I* do not hold my breath that any of these will be effective. We have a lousy winner takes all system which invariably means that the two chiefs from the opposing camps will stoop to the lowest possible gutter to gain advantage over their adversaries. Come election day everthing will boil down to simple tribal arithmetic and the anatomical nature of one's private parts.....

cry beloved kenya
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Kalonzo or Uhuru
written by Amir Ibrahim , May 17, 2007
It has been suggested that the earliest Kenyans can extricate themselves from this group of wazees and get better leadership is 2012.
Are we happy to be classified as the generation that lost it out in the power wars of Kenya?


I have never thought this made sense at all. My point if I can make it clearer is that any Gikuyu or Luo who goes to State House will end up acting exactly like these group of wazees. Why? They are unpoliceable. The constitution, rule of law, etc even in a multi-party democracy mean nothing to a leader who can call on the unquestioning loyalty of half the country.
I am calling for discrimination yes, but discrimination for the salvation of the nation. Is that also alliteration?

Now seriously. Why does anyone ever think Uhuru would make any change? Fall on his own sword?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by emmo opoti , May 19, 2007
Amir, I think increasingly there are leaders from these groups who realise that their all or nothing, we are the only ones who matter approach is unfair to the rest of the country. Interesting comments yesterday from the Luo Council of Elders head Riagga Omollo. The Saturday Nation reports that he reprimanded Ndhiwa MP Orwa Ojode for saying that there was no ODM-K without Raila Odinga.
In further comments he added that the arrogance of Luo MPs was the greatest stumbling block to Raila's ascension to State House.
It is a double-edged sword though for politicians from these groups. They need to rally support at home, while at the same time maintaining a national outlook. Consider for example Uhuru's predicament with regard to Mungiki.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
re: uhuru at last ?
written by aeichener , May 19, 2007
Now seriously. Why does anyone ever think Uhuru would make any change?


uhuru. And not Uhuru "I am a son by profession" Kenyatta.

I doubt you missed my allusion to the book.

Alexander
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
mr
written by Malachi , July 04, 2007
the problems we have had in this country are not about age of leaders or generations as some people want us to believe. i think it is about selfishness and ethinic hate. when you see young upcoming leaders like Mungatana , Kirwa, Kituyi, Kagwe, Tuju , kimunya etc shouting at the top of their voices that there was never Anglo leasing; that anglo leasing is justified because there was also goldenberg before; that there is not ethnic dicrimination in allocation of state reources etc- THEN it really dawns on you that even young leadership without commitment and steadfastness of thought is not enough.

Replacing Kibaki by a younger leader alone is not enough.Just like they say old age is wisdom but Uncle Moody has been misused by this govt to do all the dirty work, including signing anglo leasing.

younger leaders brought up in the feet of corrupt and repressive regimes will not bring the change we want. that is where i differ with those who support apologists and long time sidekick of the Moi regime.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Write comment

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
Last Updated on Tuesday, 24 June 2008 12:18