Transporting Nairobi; can Uhuru drive this car? PDF  | Print |  E-mail
Written by Angela Wairimu   
Monday, 31 March 2008 12:16
I t is far from the most graceful move, but Local Government Minister Uhuru Kenyatta's decision to restrict access into the city centre for matatus is a bold decision (whatever its motivations) and one that bears much potential.
The minister cannot, of course, be absolved for his failure to give adequate notice to the matatu owners, or to explain the exemption from his decree of the major bus companies. He cannot either be forgiven the negligent manner in which so far-reaching and disruptive an innovation was implemented, nor for lacking the foresight to adequately manage the consequences of these measures. Still, the policy may yet be redeemed and the city that was once green and in the sun, may live to celebrate a decision that should serve to reduce its overwhelming ambient air pollution and clear its streets of noisy and costly traffic jams. 
 
 

In announcing plans to set up a robust public transport system with dedicated bus lanes, and an accompanying request that the City Council put in place measures to encourage the utilisation of public transport, the ministry is following in the steps of cities worldwide that elected to use innovative bus systems to replicate at lower cost the benefits of such mass transit systems as would be offered by heavy and light rail systems. Where successful, such policies have quickly transformed streets that were once choking with smog and the noise of traffic into beautiful avenues where city residents can quickly and cheaply commute to work and business, all without placing too heavy a burden on the environment. 

The city of Curitiba in Brazil has a population of over 2 million people and 500,000 cars. A highly efficient, reliable and well integrated transport system however, ensures that 75% of commuters, some 1.3 million people, choose to travel by the 'surface metro' bus system, giving Curitiba the cleanest urban air of any Brazilian city. The whole system is entirely self-financing with a flat rate fare covering the whole city. Fares are distributed to private bus companies proportionate to the number of miles travelled, encouraging wide coverage rather than competition for passengers. The investment required for the system was about 1% of the projected cost for an underground, allowing huge amounts of money to be directed into further social improvements.
 

And it is not just the green of Nairobi's parks that would enjoy the relief of diminished traffic. If, as expected, the city council obliges and raises parking fees, the further reduction in overall city traffic should also serve to moderate national demand for private cars and ever-costlier petroleum imports (prices up by more than 400% in the last five years) and moderate the burden these impose on foreign exchange reserves. The increased use of bicycles and longer buses like double-deckers or articulated buses (like bendy-buses or even longer) should lead to a further attenuation in per-capita fuel consumption. And, if the plans prove successful, and commute times are drastically shortened by an efficient and affordable service, more city residents would also be encouraged to move into the suburbs and so reduce housing pressure on the city.

So far, the implementation of the early phases of the plan has Double M, one of the previously mentioned bus companies, running a shuttle service into the Central Business District at 20/- a turn. Matatus are still restricted to a feeder role extending to a market on the outskirts of the city from where they have to drop off commuters who can then board the shuttle service, or alternatively walk into town. It is for this disruption to the lives of innocent commuters that this policy has gained its infamy, and it is for failing to look at the wider picture that the local government minister's innovation is now best known.

It is true that Kenyans have very short memories; a roads and public works minister who pushed through similarly necessary but draconian and poorly thought-out measures against illegal city structures has recently been championed as a presidential advocate for the poor. But the local government minister, who is said to harbour ambitious notions of rising to higher political office, has now in his hands a real opportunity to show Kenyans what he could deliver to them if president. The first step would be the realisation that the project he has embarked on is larger than a mere transport issue. Secondly, measures as far-reaching, exigent and radical as this one require a great degree of community participation and a wider, more integrated, approach towards sustainability. The overarching goal of an improvement in the quality of life for Nairobi's residents demands the inclusion in decision making of as wide an array of interests as possible and the appearance of fair play at all times.  

{gallery}brt{/gallery}
 click on image to view slideshow

The innovation here, the setting up a Bus Rapid System or one like it, involves more than just stopping traffic coming into the city centre and setting aside exclusive rights of way for buses, it involves an overhaul of the entire perception of Nairobi as the core to which all roads lead, it will involve a change in payment systems for transport services, it will require a rethink of government policy on housing and land management in the capital, it will require measures that persuade consumers that public transport is better for them (rather than compulsive measures aimed at ensuring they use public transport) and finally, it asks for measures that lead to a decentralisation of business from the Central Business District. So it is that fares for example, which at present constitute up to 40% of incomes; will have to be greatly reduced and buses made more comfortable and efficient to persuade the growing middle class to abandon their cars for public systems.

In cities like Curitiba in Brazil, similar measures have led to three quarters of the population faithfully taking up public transport even though they own cars and can afford to go into work by private means. There a 5-tier system there, see inset, with a single payment that ensures  buses are both frequent (some every 90 seconds) and also appropriate to the weight of demand on that route.  


 
· Express buses operate only on dedicated busways.
· Rapid buses operate on the arteries and on other main streets throughout the city. Their routes are changed to respond to demand.
· Bi-articulated bus, is a form of rapid bus operating on the outside high-capacity lanes. Formed from 3 attached buses capable of carrying 270 passengers.
· Inter-district buses bring passengers between the city's sectors lying between the arteries, providing a link between the express and bi-articulated buses.
·Feeder buses mix with traffic on city streets and bring passengers to transfer stations, District Terminals, around which local urban development and commercial activity has flourished

Most importantly though, in a city like Nairobi, where the matatu industry employs hundreds of thousands and puts food on the tables of many more, the reduction in incomes from the successful implementation of such plans should be a matter for great concern as it would drastically reduce incomes and leave jobless, countless young . Other cities have chosen to employ those left behind by the formalisation of the transport industry in city cleaning and recycling efforts. Payments for plastic waste, for example are a large source of income for the poor in South American cities. In Nairobi, policies aimed at discouraging the entry of private vehicles into the Central Business District should be followed with the establishment of parking centres in the outskirts of the cities. From here, youth who would otherwise have been employed in the matatu business can earn themselves a living with formalised and professional valet and car repair/ servicing.

And it should not end at that, the city fathers and the Ministry of Local Government seem to believe that all unemployed Kenyans are hawkers-without-a-corner or artisans-without-a-workshop. While there are many such youth (in Curitiba, sheltered bus-stops have small retail outlets attached to them), many others are trained as accountants, lawyers, technicians and marketers, and would benefit greatly from the erection of business parks- perhaps with subsidised amenities like electricity and the internet.

Can Uhuru deliver such a revolution? That, we cannot yet tell, but he will first have to admit that this is not a job for one man, decrees delivered from on high will just not cut it.

 

 

 


Written on Monday, 31 March 2008 12:16 by Angela Wairimu

Viewed 2226 times so far. Like this? Tweet it to your followers!

Latest articles from Angela Wairimu

Latest 'tweets' from the imagine company

  • Nancy Jebet takes the gold in the 1500m women's finals. #AfricanAthleticsChampionshipsLinkFriday, 30 July 2010 14:41

Trackback(0)
Comments (14)add
0
...
written by jmaruru , March 31, 2008
Wow! The writer has managed to address the issues involved in this situation while voicing in a controlled voice the skepticism a lot of us are feeling as to the success of Uhuru's reforms. Personal feelings: Could the point about the community being involved have been stressed more if the writer had described in just a little more detail just how the community is affected? Then again, that might be an entire article for another day.

You know, people in Ongata Rongai haven't been affected except for the fact that now we don't have the midday low fares.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Traffic Planning for Nairobi
written by aeichener , April 01, 2008
The horrendous traffic problems in Nairobi are due to poor planning and exponential growth in traffic. They cannot be solved by hasty ill researched roadside decrees.

The solution to the traffic congestion problem is to facilitate the movement of as many people into and out of the city as efficiently as possible. This would mean maximizing the number of high occupancy vehicles in the city. You can't do this by banning the vehicles carrying the most people from the city center.


I could not have said it better myself.


Oh, I daresay you could have said it much better. Please let us examine the traffic situation again and with fewer fetters and blinkers around our collective heads:

First premiss:
Nairobi is a city that had some rather good and visionary city planning about 50 years ago. One can still see the impressive outlines and traces of these plans everywhere. Since then, however, half a century has passed, little has improved, and much has become worse.

Second premiss:
The matatu (and its contingent offspring: the matatu hooliganism and annoyance unculture, see Juliet's excellent article on that), as a collective taxi, is a rather typical means of transportation in the Global South (and not just in Africa). It is fairly unknown in the Global North, which shows that it need not be misinterpreted as a necessary element of public transport of the human race.

Now to the issues:

1.
To relieve a central business district or a city centre from the choking, danegrous and contaminating embrace of motor transport is quite a sound and sensible idea, and has been embraced in many cities throughout the world.
Nairobi's CBD would especially benefit from such a concept.

2.
Such a ban ought to generally encompass individual passenger vehicles (with a few exceptions) as well as matatus. To ban the collective taxies of the masses, but to allow legions of individual automobiles to clog the city, would not be stupidly injust (in worst Kenyan style), but also self-defeating (also in worst Kenyan style).

3.
Such a automobile ban is only feasible if alternative means of transportation exist. That means a network of light rail, tramways, busses, which will carry the many workers swiftly and comfortably. Some ground for such a network exists already, but it has not been properly prepared and set up.

4.
I suppose I am the only reader and poster here who has a detailed rail track map of Nairobi before his eyes. Once one looks at it, one will see that beyond the already existing rather limited role of rail commuter traffic, many more people could be moved into Nairobi and out of it again, from all directions. Just one example: the much-needed direct rail link from airport to city center needs not even to be built in the first place: it EXISTS ALREADY, but is not used, and almost nobody seems to remark this.

The same is true for many other dilapidated rail links, which are unused for passenger traffic, or have even been totally given up. Their revitalization would be easily possibly within months.

5.
The stage 4 is only possible if some tracks and rail beddings will be refurbished (easy, if not done by Kenyan companies, in their usual "cowboy contractor road disrepair" style), if some thousands of people will be resettled from road reserves (so new housing will have to be provided quickly), and if several of the rail links are upgraded from single-track to double-track.

6.
The spacious planning of the CBD and its periphery allows for tramways. Unfortunately, the middle of the big avenues and roads has by now been taken up by trees, many of them only recently planted. Nice as they are, and providing shade for thousands of street people, many of them would have to go.

7.
A periphery railway (circumscription) would also be needed. I am sure that colonial planning for such a project existed, and has remained shelved since 1946 or so. It might be worthwhile to retrieve and undust these plans.

8.
Within the city center, matatus would be relegated from a primary role to a secondary and auxiliary means of transport where the main arteries do not reach. But the mass transports in the mornings and evenings cannot and must not be handled by matatus, such a state is outrageous and actually a scandal.

Alexander
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by aeichener , April 02, 2008
By the way, Sunny Bindra has also written an excellent opinion piece on the same subject:

Why do we keep messing things up?

Alexander
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Sura Mbaya , April 02, 2008
Thanks Angela for this rather well-informed piece. Having lived in both Brazil and Colombia, I realize that Nairobi's problems are not unique and that they have been tackled in Curitiba and Bogota as you mentioned, with great success.

As to your question about whether Uhuru can deliver. My answer would be an emphatic NO. He, like a good number of politicians in Kenya, tends to adopt a rather short-term outlook to dealing with issues that require long term planning and efficient resource mobilization. It took Curitiba almost 30 years to get where it is today, based on a plan outlined in the mid-1970s.

BTW - Interesting to note that the matatu problem originated as an idea by Uhuru's father to "empower and transport" the mwananchi. The sins of the father now haunt his progeny.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
The importance of planning
written by aeichener , April 02, 2008
You have a good point, Sura Mbaya. Indeed, the 1970s are approximately the time when a holistic city planning of Nairobi did stop, and apparently never was taken up. Since then, we have only seen makeshift measures, in every field of city governance.

Alexander
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Better means of transport
written by aeichener , April 02, 2008
One may wonder why I have so stressed the various rail-bound means of mass transportation - tramway, subway, light rail - against the busses which Angela Wairimu has so heralded (for fairness' sake, I shall admit that she mentioned other means, but only passingly and dismissingly). I do believe that her scope was too narrowly focussed on busses, and was not as circumspect and widely informed as would have been good.

Rail transport is preferred in the "developed" world because it:
- is quicker
- handles vaster numbers of passengers more smoothly
- is more comfortable
- is much, much safer
- puts far less strain on environment.

The initial investment is slightly higher, as much be admitted, but rail tracks already exist. Besides, heavy busses also put big strain on the raods and this necessitate more and more frequent road repairs.

Just imagine what immense traffic toll the building of two light rails only at Mombasa Road and at Thika Road would already take off Nairobi, and how many valuable wasted hours of the wananchi could be saved!

Alexander
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
hello
written by Angela Wairimu , April 03, 2008
Please look at this for a start while I work on a longer comment. The effect of dedicated bus lanes vs public transport using articulated buses. Link here
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by pndiangui , April 03, 2008
In fact your latter reason for the rail makes even more sense; less strain to the environment. Already there is research on solar driven trams as is bio-diesel (algae based) powered speed trains. A movement towards these means is far more energy efficient and environmentally friendly.
Rail transport was overtaken by the automobile but with the challenges of infrastructure to keep automobiles on state funded roads, the business case of Rail transport in urbanised centres is looking better day in day out. No wonder the Oracle of Omaha (Warren Buffet) has been on a buying spree of rail companies abandoned in the 1930's when FORD and GM lobbied for decreased investment on rails to spur their automobile sales in United states.

Going back to the Kenyan situation. How do we get these rail networks in place? As Alexander puts it, the workmanship that is with the current contractors might be risk were we to go into a Public-Private-Partnership (PPP).

However with infrastructure managed funds of western pensioners searching for high return on investment assets, we can put together Rail infrastructure bonds in conjunction with investment banks specializing in infrastructure asset development and management. The likes of:

1.Macquarie Infrastructure that manages several toll roads around the world comes into mind for example the Warnow tunnel in the city of Rostock Germany is managed by Macquarie

2. Transurban Group - Another Australia toll roads developer.

or

3. Babcock and Brown

These PPP are necessary to speed up the execution of projects and breed local capacity in infrastructure knowledge.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Comparison of Systems
written by aeichener , April 03, 2008
You are right Angela. Long articulated buses on dedicated lanes can almost approach the performance of a tramway, and can even be more flexible.

This however only refers to a juxtaposition of busses on dedicated lines against tramways on mixed lanes. When on own distinct rail beds (as would be the case in Nairiobi), the tramway easily wins hands-down.

Alexander
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Positive Article
written by Collo , April 03, 2008
The article is well thought out but it brings to the fore part of the logical issues that the Minister should have considered before hastily implementing his directive.Nothing can excuse the immense human suffering created as a result of the little thought out initiative! see the post jogoo-road-mess
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
BRT now
written by Angela Wairimu , April 03, 2008
Alexander, you have the advantage of me, I am only equipped with a road map of Nairobi.

Now I did consider light rail, and I believe it will have a role to play but not on the city wide scale that I think reform is necessary. First, I would like us to consider the cost of the rolling stock. Buses, even articulated ones are much cheaper both to buy and to maintain than trams or trains would be. And it is not just the rolling stock but the entire infrastructure that would cost and arm and a leg. This being Kenya, I can see such a project ballooning to a trillion shillings or worse. Remember the JKIA refurbishment? Or even Muthurwa market? With BRT all we need add are the buses and a few modifications to the roads created especially by banning parking on city streets. Actually, we need not spend too much in the beginning, we can start with bus bulbs as the city looks for room for larger stations.

I am persuaded that the lifespan of a tram is only marginally better than that of a bus, especially if we are talking buses that are run purely on proper city roads with little of the potholes and abuse that have aged the present fleets so badly. I would say buses live for 15-20 years (and whats more can be sold of as second hand) and trams (20-25 years). Buses though would be cheap to maintain and to run (Peter we can also do electric buses, or bio-fuelled buses).

Buses, unlike trains or trams are also flexible, they need not run on the same route all day and can be diverted where the need is greatest.

Another important factor for me was job creation. The preference for LR over BRT in Europe and North America has always stemmed from the lower labour costs. In Kenya (not to be a Luddite) we can afford and actually need to employ as many people as possible. I cannot, I do not believe, express fully just how disruptive doing away with or even eating in a large way into the matatu industryҒs revenue will be. Those youths will have to be given an opportunity to feed themselves and their families. Matatu people could afford even middle class salaries, to suddenly take that away from them is in my view immoral and dangerous. South American countries are world leaders in this mostly because they share many of Kenyas problems. They have arge cities with transport trouble, but not enough money to go into constructing underground or even over-ground rail. Peter, we have tried PPPҒs with Kenya Railways, look where that has got us. Let us try exploit the profit motive for the public good.

And that is the other attractive quality in BRT, it allows (because of low entry costs) the formalisation and regulation of the transport industry while allowing multiple players to be involved. Peter can perhaps fashion us an article on how these groups can come together in cooperatives and own buses. The city can tender for particular routes, and renewals can be based on the performance along those routes. The annual fees from tendering and a levy on the fares can go towards running the control centre. In Bogota, six companies own the buses.

Now add to this the effect of creating retail centres along these arteries (at the bus stations where the feeder buses (yes Alexander I concede we must soon drop matatus) drop of passengers to be taken on by the bigger buses. I particularly see the relative straightness of such roads as Outer Ring, Mombasa Road, Langata Road, KomaRock Road, Thika Road, Kiambi Road, Uhuru Highway and Chiromo as inviting for such innovations.

One thing I regret not having gone into more is the importance of bicycles in this revolution. Green can be sexy and Kenyans are very impressionable people. As I have written above, anything to cut the national fuel bill, anything to make the people healthier and save public money. But BRT is for now, is much cheaper and faster than light rail, and has a much greater reach across the entire city. Importantly also, it will grow the communities, providing incentive for development along the main routes and the nodes.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Trams beat Busses
written by Johnny B. Goode , April 04, 2008
I think a tram beats a bus any day. Trams have a much higher efficiency and in our case, if we build them elevated, little if any traffic. I think your numbers are a bit off too, Angela. I don't give a bus any more than 12 years on the Kenyan roads of which the first 4 willl be returning the capital costs. The Matatu owners can be accommodated by turning the ownership into a public company, in which matatu owners, the public and the city council have shares, with current matatu owners and the council having the lions share. I'd favour a 40% split betwwen the council and current matatu owners with 20% being floated to the general public. This site here is useful and has covered much of the terrain, you cover here Angela. Tengeza

Employment and prohibitive capital costs are the only downside, but with less traffic on the road, there will be a bit of money to be gained from that. Also, the issue of dangerous driving from the public sector can be eliminated. A good efficient, traffic free transport system will also encourage private car owners to leave their cars at home every once in a while and use them only when necessary. On top of that trams are much more envitromental friendly. Bikes are indeed a wonderful thing that the city fathers past and present completely ignored. I'll never forget getting off at the train station in Eindhoven and being confronted by a sea of bicycles. The dutch really fancy them. Only problem with them is where to keep them. Even in Europe itself, they attract a lot of thieves, I can't imagine how it would be here.

The other thing is contemplating improving the address system so that taxis can be accommodated, in case someone has missed a bus or so. The city should start producing tip top maps and the taxi owners if they've not done so as yet should think of centralizing operations, so that they have a call centre or several, whose numbers are readily available to th public.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by aeichener , April 10, 2008
The comments had temporarily vanished; I am glad that they now have been retrieved. It is a fruitful discussion.

Alexander Our apologies dear, attempt there to get on to a different comment system.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
Service to Kenyans
written by Dr.Phil , April 10, 2008
Why should we be subjected to this ugly power struggle debacle about cabinet ministries,I thought every ministry is intended to provide service to the Kenyan people and should not be viewed in terms of prestige nor power.This is where the ugly head of self agrandisement shows itself among our retarded politicians.And what is indeed,sad is that wananchi are endorsing these politicians' shameless behaviour by throwing stones and destroying the very railway that will take them to their ancestral home incase hell break loose.
Is it about power or is it dedication to serve the Kenyan people in whatever capacity? Why risk taking the whole country down because of cabinet ministries,if one is claiming to be fighting for the welfare of Kenyans,let them not take the country into darkness by threatening mass action and death of innocent people.Whether one is a sports minister or minister for water development all these are very important ministries that serve the country.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Write comment

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
Last Updated on Wednesday, 02 April 2008 18:46